Implementing innovations within organizations: a systematic review and research agenda

References

• Adams, R. (2003). Perceptions of innovations: Exploring and developing innovation classification (Doctoral thesis). Cranfield University, Bedford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24, 665–694. 10.2307/3250951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1997). The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decision Sciences, 28, 557–582. 10.1111/deci.1997.28.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9, 204–215. 10.1287/isre.9.2.204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361–391. 10.1111/deci.1999.30.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiman-Smith, L., & Green, S. G. (2002). Implementing new manufacturing technology: The related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 421–430. 10.2307/3069356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, S. M., Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2010). Made to fit: How practices vary as they diffuse. Academy of Management Review, 35, 67–92. 10.5465/AMR.2010.45577876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D. E. (1996). The role of HRD in the successful implementation of information systems. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 271–278. 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-1096
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 249–269. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arvidsson, M., Johansson, C. R., Ek, Å., & Akselsson, R. (2006). Organizational climate in air traffic control: Innovative preparedness for implementation of new technology and organizational development in a rule governed organization. Applied Ergonomics, 37, 119–129. 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M. (2012). Putting creativity to work: The implementation of creative ideas in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1102–1119. 10.5465/amj.2009.0470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 45–68. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala, H., & Venkatesh, V. (2015). Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Science, 62, 156–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1978). Reflections on self-efficacy. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 1, 237–269. 10.1016/0146-6402(78)90012-7
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J., Bayer, S., & Curry, R. (2006). Implementing complex innovations in fluid multi-stakeholder environments: Experiences of ‘telecare’. Technovation, 26, 396–406. 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2010). The other side of acceptance: Studying the direct and indirect effects of emotions on information technology use. MIS Quarterly, 34, 689–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennis, W. G. (1965). Theory and method in applying behavioral science to planned organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1, 337–360. 10.1177/002188636500100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birken, S. A., Lee, S. Y., & Weiner, B. J. (2012). Uncovering middle managers’ role in healthcare innovation implementation. Implementation Science, 7, 28–39. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. J. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825–845. 10.5465/AMR.2008.34421969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondarouk, T., Kees Looise, J., & Lempsink, B. (2009). Framing the implementation of HRM innovation: HR professionals vs line managers in a construction company. Personnel Review, 38, 472–491. 10.1108/00483480910978009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., Jimmieson, N. L., & Irmer, B. E. (2011). Haunted by the Past: Effects of poor change management history on employee attitudes and turnover. Group & Organization Management, 36, 191–222. 10.1177/1059601110392990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, R. J., Price, D. H. R., Coates, P. D., & Pike, R. H. (1998). Organizing for innovation: Loose or tight control? Long Range Planning, 31, 775–782. 10.1016/S0024-6301(98)00082-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, S. D., Herold, D. M., & Fedor, D. B. (2004). Toward an understanding of the relationships among organizational change, individual differences, and changes in person-environment fit: A cross-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 868–882. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.868
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Turner, E. (2006). Innovation diffusion and technology acceptance: The case of PKI technology. Technovation, 26, 847–855. 10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. Z., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Mossholder, K. W. (2013). Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 942–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. Y., & Hu, P. J. (2002). Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: An exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, 191–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, I. H., Yun-Ping Lee, A., Parboteeah, K. P., Lai, C. S., & Chung, A. (2014). The effects of physicians’ personal characteristics on innovation readiness in Taiwan’s hospitals. Innovation, 16, 158–169. 10.5172/impp.2014.16.1.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N. (2004). Individual and contextual dynamics of innovation-use behavior in organizations. Human Performance, 17, 397–414. 10.1207/s15327043hup1704_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Chang, J. Y. (2009). Innovation implementation in the public sector: An integration of institutional and collective dynamics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 245–253. 10.1037/a0012994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Moon, W. J. (2013). Multiple forms of innovation implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 290–297. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., & Price, R. H. (2005). The effects of person–innovation fit on individual responses to innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 83–96. 10.1348/096317904X22953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, J. N., Sung, S. Y., Lee, K., & Cho, D. S. (2011). Balancing cognition and emotion: Innovation implementation as a function of cognitive appraisal and emotional reactions toward innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 107–124. 10.1002/job.684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 663–680. 10.2307/1556360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, G. H., & Choi, J. N. (inpress). Innovation implementation as a dynamic equilibrium: Emergent processes and divergent outcomes. Group & Organization Management. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1059601116645913
   Google Scholar
• Chung, G. H., Du, J., & Choi, J. N. (2014). How do employees adapt to organizational change driven by cross-border M&As? A case in China. Journal of World Business, 49, 78–86. 10.1016/j.jwb.2013.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons, E. K., Thatcher, M. E., & Row, M. C. (1995). Identifying sources of reengineering failures: A study of the behavioral factors contributing to reengineering risks. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 9–36. 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518079
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 740–751. 10.2307/30040665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189–211. 10.2307/249688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). Charismatic leadership: The elusive factor in organizational effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126, 376–380. 10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton, J. L., Vollrath, D. A., Foggat, K. L., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Jennings, K. R. (1988). Employee participation: Diverse forms and different outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 13, 8–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanpour, F., & Schneider, M. (2006). Phases of the adoption of innovation in organizations: Effects of environment, organization and top managers1. British Journal of Management, 17, 215–236. 10.1111/bjom.2006.17.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340. 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003. 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.6.1191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diefendorff, J. M., & Chandler, M. M. (2011). Motivating employees. In Z., Sheldon (Ed.). APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 65–135). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association. viii, 960.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160. 10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drach-Zahavy, A., Somech, A., Granot, M., & Spitzer, A. (2004). Can we win them all? Benefits and costs of structured and flexible innovation–implementations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 217–234. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dusenbury, L., Brannigan, R., Falco, M., & Hansen, W. B. (2003). A review of research on fidelity of implementation: Implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Education Research, 18, 237–256. 10.1093/her/18.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. 10.2307/2666999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmondson, A. C., Bohmer, R. M., & Pisano, G. P. (2001). Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 685–716. 10.2307/3094828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathiades, A., Tassou, S., & Antoniou, A. (2002). Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMT). Development of an integrated process plan. Technovation, 22, 201–212. 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00024-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7, 17–26. 10.1016/0956-5221(91)90024-U
   Google Scholar
• Fairhurst, G. T., Green, S., & Courtright, J. (1995). Inertial forces and the implementation of a socio-technical systems approach: A communication study. Organization Science, 6, 168–185. 10.1287/orsc.6.2.168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidler, L. A., & Johnson, J. D. (1984). Communication and innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 9, 704–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, S. (1992). Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 505–538. 10.2307/256485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischer, M., Liker, J., & Arnsdorf, D. (1988). Effective use of computer-aided design and computer-aided engineering in manufacturing. Ann Arbor, MI: Industrial Technology Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1993). A validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker innovativeness scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 1105–1116. 10.1177/0013164493053004023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frambach, R. T., & Schillewaert, N. (2002). Organizational innovation adoption: A multi-level framework of determinants and opportunities for future research. Journal of Business Research, 55, 163–176. 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00152-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk, Janet (1990). Toward a ‘critical mass’ theory of interactive media. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 194–218). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 10.4135/9781483325385
   Google Scholar
• Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, T. G. (1996). Expert systems usage: Task change and intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 20, 301–329. 10.2307/249658
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19, 213–236. 10.2307/249689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S., Gavin, M., & Aiman-Smith, L. (1995). Radical technological innovation: Measure development and validation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 203–214. 10.1109/17.403738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., Macfarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. The Milbank Quarterly, 82, 581–629. 10.1111/milq.2004.82.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T., Robert, F., Bate, P., Macfarlane, F., & Kyriakidou, O. (2005). Diffusion of innovations in health service organisations. Malden, MA: BMJ Books Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470987407
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. L. (1999). Technology features as triggers for sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 24, 472–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haour, G. (2004). Resolving the innovation paradox. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230510555
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, A., & Stock, J. R. (2003). Adoption and implementation of technological innovations within long-term relationships. Journal of Business Research, 56, 681–686. 10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00313-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herscovitch, L., & Meyer, J. P. (2002). Commitment to organizational change: Extension of a three-component model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 474–487. 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, M. C., Weiner, J., & Young, L. (2012). Implementation teams: A new lever for organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 366–388. 10.1002/job.1773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, W., Thong, J. Y., Chasalow, L. C., & Dhillon, G. (2011). User acceptance of agile information systems: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28, 235–272. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222280108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, J. P. A., Rai, A., & Keil, M. (2008). Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quarterly, 32, 97–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, P. J., Chau, P. Y., Sheng, O. R. L., & Tam, K. Y. (1999). Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16, 91–112. 10.1080/07421222.1999.11518247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S. R., Weiner, B. J., & Bunger, A. C. (2014). Context matters: Measuring implementation climate among individuals and groups. Implementation Science, 9, 1–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, K. J., & Kristof-Brown, A. (2006). Toward a multidimensional theory of person-environment fit. Journal of Managerial Issues, 18, 193–212.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., van de Vliert, E., & West, M. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 129–145.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaynes, S. (2014). Using principles of practice-based research to teach evidence-based practice in social work. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 11, 222–235. 10.1080/15433714.2013.850327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L., & Griffiths, A. (2005). The impact of organizational culture and reshaping capabilities on change implementation success: The mediating role of readiness for change. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 361–386. 10.1111/joms.2005.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Pucik, V., & Welbourne, T. M. (1999). Managerial coping with organizational change: A dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 107–122. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R. (1992). Work motivation: New directions in theory and research. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 1–53.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23, 183–213. 10.2307/249751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, P. G. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24, 24–33. 10.1145/358527.358543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2009). Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: A status quo bias perspective. MIS Quarterly, 33, 567–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 689–713. 10.2307/256170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsh, S. R., Lawrence, R. H., & Aron, D. C. (2008). Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: A case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes. Implementation Science, 3, 1–15. 10.1186/1748-5908-3-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Knight, A. P. (2005). Innovation implementation overcoming the challenge. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 243–246. 10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Ralls, R. S. (1997). The unintended organizational consequences of technology training: Implications for training theory, research, and practice. In J. K. Ford, S. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger, E. Salas, & M. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in organizations (pp. 323–354). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Implementing computerized technology: An organizational analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 811–824. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korunka, C., Weiss, A., & Zauchner, S. (1997). An interview study of’ continuous’ implementations of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 16, 3–16. 10.1080/014492997119978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, D. E. (2004). Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors: An empirical investigation. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 79–102. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, D. E., Gebert, D., & Kearney, E. (2007). Implementing process innovations the benefits of combining delegative-participative with consultative-advisory leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14, 16–25. 10.1177/1071791907304224
   Google Scholar
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person-organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49, 1–49. 10.1111/peps.1996.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person-Environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 3 (pp. 3–50). Washington, DC: APA.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V., Maheshwari, B., & Kumar, U. (2003). An investigation of critical management issues in ERP implementation: Empirical evidence from Canadian organizations. Technovation, 23, 793–807. 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00015-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuratko, D. F., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2014). Why implementing corporate innovation is so difficult. Business Horizons, 57, 647–655. 10.1016/j.bushor.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, O., Choi, K., & Kim, M. (2007). User acceptance of context-aware services: Self-efficacy, user innovativeness and perceived sensitivity on contextual pressure. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26, 483–498. 10.1080/01449290600709111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawler, E. E., & Mohrman, S. A. (1991). Quality circles: After the honeymoon. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Psychological dimensions of organizational behavior. (pp. 523–533). New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 40, 191–204. 10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34, 1252–1265. 10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D., & Kraus, W. A. (1985). Implementing new technology. Harvard Business Review, 63, 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1961). Quasi-stationary social equilibria and the problem of permanent change. In W. G. Bennis, K. Benne, & T. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (pp. 238–244). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly, 31, 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linton, J. D. (2002). Implementation research: State of the art and future directions. Technovation, 22, 65–79. 10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00075-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungquist, U. (2014). Unbalanced dynamic capabilities as obstacles of organisational efficiency: Implementation issues in innovative technology adoption. Innovation, 16, 82–95. 10.5172/impp.2014.16.1.82
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, H., Luo, W., & Strong, D. (2000). Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems, 9, 91–103. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macduffie, J. P. (1995). Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. ILR Review, 48, 197–221. 10.1177/001979399504800201
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D. F., & Kirsch, L. J. (2008). How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: Beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25, 267–300. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222250110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. (1983). Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM, 26, 430–444. 10.1145/358141.358148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J., Ahearne, M., & Taylor, S. R. (2007). A longitudinal cross-level model of leader and salesperson influences on sales force technology use and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 528–537. 10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKersie, R. B., & Walton, R. E. (1991). Organizational change. In M. Scott Morton (Ed.), The corporation of the 1990s: Information technology and organizational transformation (pp. 244–277). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Michaelis, B., Stegmaier, R., & Sonntag, K. (2010). Shedding light on followers’ innovation implementation behavior: The role of transformational leadership, commitment to change, and climate for initiative. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 25, 408–429. 10.1108/02683941011035304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrman, S. A., Tenkasi, R. V., & Mohrman, A. M. (2003). The role of networks in fundamental organizational change a grounded analysis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 301–323. 10.1177/0021886303258072
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2, 192–222. 10.1287/isre.2.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. G., & Venkatesh, V. (2000). Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implications for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology, 53, 375–403. 10.1111/peps.2000.53.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 313–351. 10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00043-1
   Google Scholar
• Naveh, E., Meilich, O., & Marcus, A. (2006). The effects of administrative innovation implementation on performance: An organizational learning approach. Strategic Organization, 4, 275–302. 10.1177/1476127006066969
   Google Scholar
• Nembhard, I. M., Alexander, J. A., Hoff, T. J., & Ramanujam, R. (2009). Why does the quality of health care continue to lag? insights from management research. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 24–42. 10.5465/AMP.2009.37008001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord, W. R., & Tucker, A. (1987). Implementing routine and radical innovations. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Northouse, P. G. (2007). Leadership: Theory and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Oke, A., Munshi, N., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2009). The influence of leadership on innovation processes and activities. Organizational Dynamics, 38, 64–72. 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 879–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. E., Marwell, G., & Teixeira, R. (1985). Interdependence, group heterogeneity and the production of collective goods: A theory of the critical mass, I’. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 522–556. 10.1086/228313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 680–693. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6, 423–444. 10.1287/orsc.6.4.423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30, 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., … Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42, 423–442. 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (1990). Conditions that permit intensive supervision programs to survive. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 126–145. 10.1177/0011128790036001009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pullig, C., Maxham, J. G., & Hair, J. F. (2002). Salesforce automation systems: An exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and salesforce productivity. Journal of Business Research, 55, 401–415. 10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00159-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., Kahn, J. A., & Mandl, M. J. (1994). Perspectives on organizational change: Exploring movement at the interface. In G. Jerald (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science. Series in applied psychology (pp. 109–133). Hillsdale, NJ, England: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P. (2002). A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organization Science, 13, 109–127. 10.1287/orsc.13.2.109.535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repenning, N. P., & Sterman, J. D. (2002). Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 265–295. 10.2307/3094806
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivard, S. (1987). Successful implementation of end-user computing. Interfaces, 17, 25–33. 10.1287/inte.17.3.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (p. 12). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Adhikarya, R. (1979). Diffusion of innovations: An up-to-date review and commentary. Communication Yearbook, 3, 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F. F. (1971). Communication of innovations; a cross-cultural approach. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. M. (1988). Managing the change to an automated office: Lessons from five case studies. Office Technology and People, 4, 31–52. 10.1108/eb022653
   Google Scholar
• Ruta, C. D. (2005). The application of change management theory to HR portal implementation in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. Human Resource Management, 44, 35–53. 10.1002/hrm.v44:1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed, K. A., Abdinnour, S., Lengnick-Hall, M. L., & Lengnick-Hall, C. A. (2010). Examining the impact of pre-implementation expectations on post-implementation use of enterprise systems: A longitudinal study. Decision Sciences, 41, 659–688. 10.1111/deci.2010.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59. 10.1007/BF00055564
   Google Scholar
• Satzinger, J. W., & Olfman, L. (1995). Computer support for group work: Perceptions of the usefulness of support scenarios and end-user tools. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, 115–148. 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518062
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933–958. 10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. (2003). The contingent effects of management support and task interdependence on successful information systems implementation. MIS Quarterly, 27, 533–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S. (1993). Innovation and learning during implementation: A comparison of user and manufacturer innovations. Research Policy, 22, 81–95. 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90034-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohal, A. S. (1996). Assessing AMT implementations: an empirical field study. Technovation, 16, 377–444. 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00045-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation the role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39, 684–708. 10.1177/0149206310394187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stumpf, S. A., Brief, A. P., & Hartman, K. (1987). Self-efficacy expectations and coping with career-related events. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 91–108. 10.1016/0001-8791(87)90037-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, L. Y., Aryee, S., & Law, K. S. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 558–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, S. Y., Cho, D. S., & Choi, J. N. (2011). Who initiates and who implements? A multi-stage, multi-agent model of organizational innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 344–363. 10.1017/S1833367200001516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19, 561–570. 10.2307/249633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tett, R. P., & Guterman, H. A. (2000). Situation trait relevance, trait expression, and cross-situational consistency: Testing a principle of trait activation. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 397–423. 10.1006/jrpe.2000.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15, 125–143. 10.2307/249443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, J. (2001). Innovation management in context: Environment, organization and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3, 169–183. 10.1111/ijmr.2001.3.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2000). A theory of attitudes, subjective norms, and private versus collective self-concepts. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context (pp. 47–65). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222. 10.1111/bjom.2003.14.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivisonno, M., & Barling, J. (2016). Organizational leadership and employee commitment. In J. Meyer (Ed.), Handbook of employee commitment (pp. 305–318). Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, R., Porter, G. A., Grunfeld, E., & Sargeant, J. (2012). Exploring the interpersonal-, organization-, and system-level factors that influence the implementation and use of an innovation-synoptic reporting-in cancer care. Implementation Science, 7, 12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, R., Porter, G. A., Sargeant, J., Jackson, L., & Grunfeld, E. (2014). Multi-level factors influence the implementation and use of complex innovations in cancer care: A multiple case study of synoptic reporting. Implementation Science, 9, 1–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Ven, A. H., & Rogers, E. M. (1988). Innovations and organizations: Critical perspectives. Communication Research, 15, 632–651. 10.1177/009365088015005007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. (1999). Creation of favorable user perceptions: Exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Quarterly, 23, 239–260. 10.2307/249753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39, 273–315. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204. 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., & Morris, M. G. (2002). User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decision Sciences, 33, 297–316. 10.1111/deci.2002.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila, L. E., Pérez, P. J., & Coll-Serrano, V. (2014). Innovation at the workplace: Do professional competencies matter? Journal of Business Research, 67, 752–757. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrakking, W. J. (1995). The implementation game. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 8, 31–46. 10.1108/09534819510090141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, G., & Miao, C. F. (2015). Effects of sales force market orientation on creativity, innovation implementation, and sales performance. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2374–2382. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins, K. E., Ellinger, A. D., & Valentine, T. (1999). Understanding support for innovation in a large-scale change effort: The manager-as-instructor approach. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 10, 63–77. 10.1002/(ISSN)1532-1096
   Google Scholar
• Weenig, M. W. (1999). Communication networks in the diffusion of an innovation in an organization1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1072–1092. 10.1111/jasp.1999.29.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. J. (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4, 67–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 3–13). Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, R. A. (1995). Human resource management innovations: Determinants of their adoption and implementation. Human Resource Management, 34, 313–327. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, R., Wright, P. M., & Smart, D. L. (2006). Radical HRM innovation and competitive advantage: The Moneyball story. Human Resource Management, 45, 111–145. 10.1002/(ISSN)1099-050X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yetton, P., Sharma, R., & Southon, G. (1999). Successful IS innovation: The contingent contributions of innovation characteristics and implementation process. Journal of Information Technology, 14, 53–68. 10.1080/026839699344746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, M. Y., Fiedler, K. D., & Park, J. S. (2006). Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of IT-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures. Decision Sciences, 37, 393–426. 10.1111/deci.2006.37.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & O’Neal, Q. (1995). Exploring the factors associated with expert systems success. MIS Quarterly, 19, 83–106. 10.2307/249712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1999). An evaluative essay on current conceptions of effective leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8, 33–48. 10.1080/135943299398429
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (1988). In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar