Team learning behaviours as predictors of innovative work behaviour – a longitudinal study

References

• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednall, T. C., Sanders, K., & Runhaar, P. (2014). Stimulating informal learning activities through perceptions of performance appraisal quality and human resource management system strength: A two-wave study. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13, 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bresman, H., & Zellmer-Bruhn, M. (2013). The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24, 1120–1139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buljac-Samardzic, M., & Van Woerkom, M. (2015). Can managers coach their teams too much? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30, 280–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21, 609–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, C. G., Gibson, C. B., Quigley, N. R., & Parker, S. K. (2016). Unpacking team dynamics with growth modeling: An approach to test, refine, and integrate theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 6, 63–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativityand Innovation Management, 19, 23–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decuyper, S., Dochy, F., & Van den Bossche, P. (2010). Grasping the dynamic complexity of team learning: An integrative model for effective team learning in organizations. Educational Research Review, 5, 111–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Garcia, C., Gonzalez-Moreno, A., & Saez-Martinez, F. J. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 15, 149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolinska, M. (2015). Knowledge based development of innovative companies within the framework of innovation networks. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 17, 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D. (2017). Organizing for innovation in complex innovation systems. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19, 11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, D., Shippton, H., West, M. A., & Patterson, M. (2015). Teamwork and organizational innovation: The moderating role of the HRM context. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiser, C. (2012). Data analysis with Mplus. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 90–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., & Mann, L. (2004). A model of R&D leadership and team communication: The relationship with project performance. R&D Management, 34, 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., Van Knippenberg, D., & Zhou, J. (2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280–293. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40390288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C.-C. (2009). Knowledge sharing and group cohesiveness on performance: An empirical study of technology R&D teams in Taiwan. Technovation, 29, 786–797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behaviour and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, T. D., Pornprasertmanit, S., Schoemann, A. M., & Rosseel, Y. (2017). semTools: Useful tools for structural equation modeling. R package version 0.4. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semTools
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., & Chung, G. H. (2017). Implementing innovations within organizations: A systematic review and research agenda. Innovation: Organization & Management, 19, 372–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, N. (1992). Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. L. (1997). Educational implications of analogy. A view from case-based reasoning. American Psychologist, 52, 57–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 270–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). London, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2017). Team learning: New insights through a temporal lens. Small Group Research, 48, 123–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Schuler, R. S., & Zhang, P. (2013). External learning activities and employee creativity in Chinese R&D teams. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 20, 429–448.
   Google Scholar
• Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinova, D., & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook on innovation (pp. 44–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McNeish, D. (2017). Challenging conventional wisdom for multivariate statistical models with small samples. Review of Educational Research, 87, 1117–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2012). Development of a measurement instrument for innovative work behaviour as a dynamic and context-bound construct. Human Resource Development International, 15, 43–59.
   Google Scholar
• Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2015). Reflection as a facilitator of teachers’ innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Training and Development, 19, 125–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, A., Herbig, B., & Petrovic, K. (2009). The explication of implicit team knowledge and its supporting effect on team processes and technical innovations: An action regulation perspective on team reflexivity. Small Group Research, 40, 28–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, C. J., & Owens, P. (1996). Making work group more effective: The value of minority dissent. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 125–141). London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, W. (2017). Team learning at work. Activities, products, and antecedents of team learning in organizational complex decision-making teams ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://epub.uni-regensburg.de/36361/
   Google Scholar
• Oberski, D. L. (2014). lavaan.survey: An R package for complex survey analysis of structural equation models. Journal of Statistical Software, 57, 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piaget, J. (1977). The development of thought: Equilibration of cognitive structures. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Puranam, P. (2017). When will we stop studying innovations, and start creating them? Innovation: Organization & Management, 19, 5–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raes, E., Kyndt, E., Decuyper, S., Van de Bossche, P., & Dochy, F. (2015). An exploratory study of group development and team learning. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26, 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimianzarif, E., & Moradi, M. (2018). Designing integrated management criteria of creative ideation based on fuzzy delphi analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20, 877–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, R. A. (2008). Time in Applied Psychology - The Study of “What Happens” Rather than “What Is”. European Psychologist, 13(37–52). doi:10.1027/1016-9040.13.1.37
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel, Y. (2017). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/
   Google Scholar
• Rupprecht, M. (2014). Innovatives Verhalten bei Diversität in Unternehmensberatungsteams. Hamburg: Dr. Kovac.
   Google Scholar
• Rupprecht, M., Strasser, J., Mulder, R. H., & Gruber, H. (2011). Innovatives verhalten in heterogenen beratungsteams. In S. Dohrn, J. P. Hasebrook, & M. Schmette (Eds.), Vielfalt und innovation: Strategisches diversity management für innovationserfolg (pp. S. 246–274). Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, M. C., Den Hartog, D. N., & Koopman, P. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56, 189–2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2007). Schools as team-based organizations: A structureprocess-outcomes approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 305–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somech, A., & Khalaili, A. (2014). Team boundary activity: Its mediating role in the relationship between structural conditions and team innovation. Group & Organization Management, 39, 274–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2008). Exploring the effects of trust, taks interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams. Info Systems Journal, 18, 617–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers’ innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 430–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toubia, O. (2006). Idea generation, creativity, and incentives. Marketing Science, 25, 411–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2016). Mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45, 1–67. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v45/i03/
   Google Scholar
• Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments: Team learning beliefs and behaviors. Small Group Research, 37, 490–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Haar, S., Segers, M., & Jehn, K. A. (2013). Towards a contextualized model of team learnin processes and outcomes. Educational Research Review, 10, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., & Raes, E. (2016). Team learning in teacher teams: Team entitativity as a bridge between teams-in-theory and teams-in-practice. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 275–298. doi:10.1007/s10212-015-0279-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, F., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2013). Harnessing members’ positive mood for team-directed learning behaviour and team innovation: The moderating role of perceived team feedback. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 22, 235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation Implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 51, 355–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., Messmann, G., & Mulder, R. H. (2016). The impact of team learning behaviors on team innovative work behavior: a systematic review. Human Resource Development Review, 15, 429–458. doi:10.1177/1534484316673713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, A., & Mulder, R. H. (2018). Team learning behaviours and innovative work behaviour in work teams. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21 501–520. doi:10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, K., Sauer, S. J., & Mannix, E. A. (2014). Conflict and creativity in interdisciplinary teams. Small Group Research, 45, 266–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 115–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., & Wang, D. X. (2011). Leadership behaviors and group creativity in Chinese organizations: The role of group processes. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 851–862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar