5,052
Views
35
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Culture, innovation and entrepreneurship

, , &
Pages 1-12 | Received 15 Oct 2018, Accepted 16 Oct 2018, Published online: 29 Oct 2018

References

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.
  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2010). Entrepreneurship and epistemology: The philosophical underpinnings of the study of entrepreneurial opportunities. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 557–583.
  • Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Anderson, P. (2013). Forming and exploiting opportunities: The implications of discovery and creation processes for entrepreneurial and organizational research. Organization Science, 24, 301–317.
  • Angouri, J. (2018). Culture, discourse, and the workplace. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Barley, S. R. (1983). Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(3), 393–413.
  • Barley, S. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 490–515). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Bartel, S., & Garud, R. (2009). The role of narratives in sustaining organizational innovation. Organization Science, 20, 107–117.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Clarke, J. (2011). Revitalizing Entrepreneurship: How visual symbols are used in entrepreneurial performances. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1365–1391.
  • Clarke, J., Cornelissen, J. P., & Healey, M. (2018). Actions speak louder than words: How figurative language and gesturing in entrepreneurial pitches influences investment judgements. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2016.1008
  • Cornelissen, J. P. (2012). Sensemaking under pressure: The influence of professional roles and social accountability on the creation of sense. Organization Science, 23, 118–137.
  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Clarke, J. S. (2010). Imagining and rationalizing opportunities: Inductive reasoning and the creation and justification of new ventures. Academy of Management Review, 35, 539–557.
  • Cornelissen, J. P., Durand, R., Fiss, P. C., Lammers, J. C., & Vaara, E. (2015). Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 40, 10–27.
  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8, 181–235.
  • Dalpiaz, E., Rindova, V., & Ravasi, D. (2016). Combining logics to transform organizational agency blending industry and art at Alessi. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61, 347–392.
  • Dalpiaz, E., Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2014). Succession narratives in family business: The case of Alessi. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38, 1375–1394.
  • Durand, R., Granqvist, N., & Tyllström, A. (Eds.). (2017). From categories to categorization: Studies in sociology, organizations and strategy at the crossroads. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 51). Bingley, UK: Emerald.
  • Foss, N. J., Klein, P. G., & Bjørnskov, C. (forthcoming). The context of entrepreneurial judgment: Organizations, markets, and institutions. Journal of Management Studies.
  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Friedland, R., & Mohr, J. (2004). The cultural turn in American sociology. In R. Friedland & J. Mohr (Eds.), Matters of culture: Cultural sociology in practice (pp. 1–68). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gartner, W. B., Bird, B. J., & Starr, J. A. (1992). Acting as if: Differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 13–32.
  • Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43, 1177–1188.
  • Garud, R., Schildt, H. A., & Lant, T. K. (2014). Entrepreneurial storytelling, future expectations, and the paradox of legitimacy. Organization Science, 25, 1479–1492.
  • Gehman, J., & Soublière, J. F. (2017). Cultural entrepreneurship: From making culture to cultural making. Innovation: Organization and Management, 19, 61–73.
  • Gehman, J., Treviño, L. K., & Garud, R. (2013). Values work: A process study of the emergence and performance of organizational values practices. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 84–112.
  • Giorgi, S., Lockwood, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2015). The many faces of culture: Making sense of 30 years of research on culture in organization studies. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 1–54.
  • Glaser, V. (2017). Design Performances: How organizations inscribe artifacts to change routines. Academy of Management Journal. doi:10.5465/amj.2014.0842
  • Granqvist, N., Grodal, S., & Woolley, J. L. (2013). Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science, 24(2), 395–413.
  • Grodal, S., & Granqvist, N. (2014). Great expectations: Discourse and affect during field emergence. Emotions and the organizational fabric. Research on Emotion in Organizations, 10, 139–166.
  • Hannigan, T. R., Seidel, V. P., & Yakis-Douglas, B. (2018). Product innovation rumors as forms of open innovation. Research Policy. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.018
  • Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences : International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
  • Höllerer, M. A., Daudigeos, T., & Jancsary, D. (Eds.). (2018). Multimodality, meaning, and institutions. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 54(A-B)). Bingley: Emerald.
  • Jancsary, D., Meyer, R., Höllerer, M. A., & Boxenbaum, E. (2018). Institutions as multimodal accomplishments: Towards the analysis of visual registers. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 54A, 87–117.
  • Jones, C., Lorenzen, M., & Sapsed, J. (2015). The Oxford handbook of creative industries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jones, C., Maoret, M., Massa, F. G., & Svejenova, S. (2012). Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category ‘modern architecture,’ 1870–1975. Organization Science, 23, 1523–1545.
  • Kahl, S. J., & Grodal, S. (2016). Discursive strategies and radical technological change: Multilevel discourse analysis of the early computer (1947–1958). Strategic Management Journal, 37, 149–166.
  • Kennedy, M. T. (2008). Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. American Sociological Review, 73, 270–295.
  • Kennedy, M. T., & Fiss, P. (2013). An ontological turn in categories research: From standards of legitimacy to evidence of actuality. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1138–1154.
  • Khaire, M. (2017). Culture and commerce: The value of entrepreneurship in creative industries. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Krabbe, A. D., & Grodal, S. (2018). Big, beige and bulky: Aesthetic shifts in the hearing aid industry, 1945–2015. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, August 2018.
  • Loewenstein, J., Ocasio, W., & Jones, C. (2012). Vocabularies and vocabulary structure. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 41–86.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional approach to innovation. Organization Studies, 28, 993–1012.
  • Lounsbury, M., Gehman, J., & Glynn, M. A. (forthcoming). Beyond Homo Entrepreneurus: Judgment and the Theory of Cultural Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (forthcoming). Cultural entrepreneurship: A new agenda for the study of entrepreneurial processes and possibilities. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lounsbury, M., & Ventresca, M. (2003). The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization, 10(3), 457–480.
  • Mantere, S., Aula, P., Schildt, H., & Vaara, E. (2013). Narrative attributions of entrepreneurialfailure. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 459–473.
  • Martens, M. L., Jennings, J. E., & Jennings, P. D. (2007). Do the stories they tell get them the money they need? The role of entrepreneurial narratives in resource acquisition. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1107–1132.
  • Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1241–1262.
  • Mische, A., & Pattison, P. (2000). Composing a civic arena: Publics, projects, and social settings. Poetics, 27(2–3), 163–194.
  • Mohr, J. W. (1998). Measuring meaning structures. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 345–370.
  • Mohr, J. W., & Ghaziani, A. (2014). Problems and prospects of measurement in the study of culture. Theory and Society, 43(3–4), 225–246.
  • Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990–2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55, 439–471.
  • Nee, V., & Brinton, M. C. (Eds.). (1998). The new institutionalism in sociology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Perkmann, M., & Spicer, A. (2014). How emerging organizations take form: The role of imprinting and values in organizational bricolage. Organization Science, 25, 1785–1806.
  • Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. (2011). A cultural quest: A study of organizational use of new cultural resources in strategy formation. Organization Science, 22, 413–431.
  • Rindova, V. P., & Petkova, A. P. (2007). When is a new thing a good thing? Technological change, product form design and perceptions of value for product innovations. Organization Science, 18(2), 217–232.
  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise new horizon. North Hampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Schatzki, T. R. (2003). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. Penn State University Press, 2003.
  • Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. North Hampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Shane, S. A., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of enterpreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217–226.
  • Slade Shantz, A., Kistruck, G., & Zietsma, C. (2018). The opportunity not taken: The occupational identity of entrepreneurs in contexts of poverty. Journal of Business Venturing, 33, 416–437.
  • Smets, M., Greenwood, R., & Lounsbury, M. (2015). Institutional theory and strategy as practice. In D. Golsorkhi, L. Rouleau, D. Seidl, & E. Vaara (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice (Vol. 16, pp. 285–302). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Soderberg, A. M., & Vaara, E. (Eds.). (2003). Merging across borders: People, cultures and politics. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
  • Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
  • Thornton, P. H. (1999). The Sociology of Entrepreneurship. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 19–46.
  • Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Tukiainen, S. (2010). Finnishness in cross cultural interaction in international engineering projects. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Helsinki School of Business, Helsinki.
  • Überbacher, F. (2014). Legitimation of new ventures: A review and research programme. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 667–698.
  • Überbacher, F., Jacobs, C. D., & Cornelissen, J. P. (2015). How entrepreneurs become skilled cultural operators. Organization Studies, 36, 925–951.
  • Vaara, E., Sonenshein, S., & Boje, D. (2016). Narratives as sources of stability and change in organizations: Approaches and directions for future research. Academy of Management Annals, 10, 495–560.
  • Vergne, J. P. (2012). Stigmatized categories and public disapproval of organizations: A mixed-methods study of the global arms industry,1996–2007. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1027–1052.
  • Weber, K., & Dacin, M. T. (2011). The cultural construction of organizational life: Introduction to the special issue. Organization Science, 22, 287–298.
  • Weber, K., Heinz, K., & DeSoucey, M. (2008). Forage for thought: Mobilizing codes for grass- fed meat and dairy products. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53, 529–567.
  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
  • Wry, T., Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimating nascent collective identities: Coordinating cultural entrepreneurship. Organization Science, 22, 449–463.
  • Zhao, E. Y., Fisher, G., Lounsbury, M., & Miller, D. (2017). Optimal distinctiveness: Broadening the interface between institutional theory and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38, 93–113.
  • Zietsma, C., Groenewegen, P., Logue, D., & Hinings, C. R. (2017). Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of Management Annals, 11, 391–450.
  • Zilber, T. B. (2007). Stories and the discursive dynamics of institutional entrepreneurship: The case of Israeli high tech after the bubble. Organization Studies, 28, 1035–1054.
  • Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007). How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 70–105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.