How innovation nurtures well-being in enthusiast communities

References

• Antorini, Y. M., & Muñiz, A. M. (2013). The benefits and challenges of collaborating with user communities. Research-Technology Management, 56(3), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5603931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashman, R., Patterson, A., & Brown, S. (2018). ‘Don’t forget to like, share and subscribe’: Digital autopreneurs in a neoliberal world. Journal of Business Research, 92, 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.07.055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation. Organization Science, 22(6), 1399–1417. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baraldi, E., Guercini, S., Lindahl, M., & Perna, A. (2020). Passion and entrepreneurship. Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification. The economies of worth. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, J., Harwood, T., & Garry, T. (2018). Value transformation in the ‘Let’s Play’ gaming subculture. Journal of Creating Value, 4(2), 229–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964318804705
   Google Scholar
• Boyaval, M., & Herbert, M. (2018). One for all and all for one? The bliss and torment in communal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 92(November), 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.023
   Google Scholar
• Brinks, V. (2016). Situated affect and collective meaning: A community perspective on processes of value creation and commercialization in enthusiast-driven fields. Environment & Planning A, 48(6), 1152–1169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X16633470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinks, V., & Ibert, O. (2015). Mushrooming entrepreneurship: The dynamic geography of enthusiast-driven innovation. Geoforum, 65, 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger-Helmchen, T., & Cohendet, P. (2011). User communities and social software in the video game industry. Long Range Planning, 44(5), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger-Helmchen, T., & Guittard, C. (2008). Are users the next entrepreneurs? A case study on the video game industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 6(6), 57–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1146531
   Google Scholar
• Chatterji, A. K., & Fabrizio, K. R. (2014). Using users: When does external knowledge enhance corporate product innovation? Strategic Management Journal, 35(10), 1427–1445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, S., & Pfeiffer, D. (2017). Happiness: An alternative objective for sustainable community development. In R. Phillips & C. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 85–96). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Cova, B., & Cova, V. (2002). Tribal marketing: The tribalisation of society and its impact on the conduct of marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 36(5/6), 595–620. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560210423023
   Google Scholar
• Cova, B., & Guercini, S. (2016). Passion et entrepreneuriat: Vers un entrepreneur tribal? (Passion and entrepreneurship: Toward a tribal entrepreneur?). Revue de l’Entrepreneuriat, 15(2), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.3917/entre.152.0015
   Google Scholar
• Cova, B., Kozinets, R. V., & Shankar, A. (eds.). (2007). Consumer tribes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988–1007. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E. (2009). Subjective well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), The science of well-being (pp. 11–58). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dolan, P., & Metcalfe, R. (2012). The relationship between innovation and subjective well-being. Research Policy, 41(8), 1489–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois, A., & Gadde, L. E. (2014). Systematic combining. A decade later. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1277–1284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.03.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., & Shah, S. (2003). How communities support innovative activities. An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00006-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franke, N., Von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding commercially attractive user innovations: A test of lead-user theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambardella, A., Raasch, C., & von Hippel, E. (2017). The user innovation paradigm: Impacts on markets and welfare. Management Science, 63(5), 1450–1468. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualizations. Wider Discussion Papers, World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER), No. 2004/06. United Nations University - World Institute for Development Economics Research.
   Google Scholar
• Gebauer, J., Füller, J., & Pezzei, R. (2013). The dark and the bright side of co-creation: Triggers of member behavior in online innovation communities. Journal of Business Research, 66(9), 1516–1527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, C., & Saren, M. (2007). Gothic’ entrepreneurs: A study of the subcultural commodification process. In B. Cova, R. V. Kozinets, & A. Shankar (Eds.), Consumer tribes (pp. 227–242). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goulding, C., Shankar, A., & Canniford, R. (2013). Learning to be tribal: Facilitating the formation of consumer tribes. European Journal of Marketing, 47(5/6), 813–832. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561311306886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulding, C., Shankar, A., & Elliott, R. (2002). Working weeks, rave weekends: Identity fragmentation and the emergence of new communities. Consumption, Markets and Culture, 5(4), 261–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/1025386022000001406
   Google Scholar
• Groenland, E., & Dana, L. P. (2019). Qualitative methodologies and data collection methods: Toward increased rigour in management research. World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Guercini, S., & Cova, B. (2018). Unconventional entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 92, 385–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guercini, S., & Ranfagni, S. (2016). Conviviality behavior in entrepreneurial communities and business networks. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haefliger, S., Jäger, P., & von Krogh, G. (2010). Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs. Research Policy, 39(9), 1198–1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, L., & Hyysalo, S. (2013). How do we keep the living laboratory alive? Learning and conflicts in living lab collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 12. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/749
   Google Scholar
• Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C. (2006). The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry. R&D Management, 36(3), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00430.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring how peer communities enable lead user innovations to become standard equipment in the industry: Community pull effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(S1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00869.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hienerth, C., von Hippel, E., & Jensen, M. B. (2014). User community vs. producer innovation development efficiency: A first empirical study. Research Policy, 43(1), 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppert, F. A., & So, T. T. (2013). Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being. Social Indicators Research, 110(3), 837–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9966-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H. (2014). Rethinking ‘rethinking convergence/culture’. Cultural Studies, 28(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2013.801579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2014). Forecasting the commercial attractiveness of user‐generated designs using online data: An empirical study within the LEGO user community. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 61(S1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12193
   Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, L. B. (2021). Social movements and free innovation. Research Policy, 50(6), 104238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korbel, J. J., & Grosse, M. (2020). Identification and classification of household sector innovation: The parallel product market and the importance of context and complexity. Innovation: Organization & Management, 22(2), 193–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1653766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2001). Utopian enterprise: Articulating the meanings of star trek’s culture of consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(1), 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1086/321948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, M. S. W., & Seo Youn Ahn, C. (2016). Anti-consumption, materialism, and consumer well-being. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 50(1), 18–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepak, P. D., Smith, K. G., & Taylor, M. S. (2007). Value creation and value capture: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra, N. K. (2006). Consumer well-being and quality of life: An assessment and directions for future research. Journal of Macromarketing, 26(1), 77–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146705285970
   Google Scholar
• Mamali, E., Nuttall, P., & Shankar, A. (2018). Formalizing consumer tribes: Towards a theorization of consumer-constructed organizations. Marketing Theory, 18(4), 521–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593118767723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, D. M., & Schouten, J. W. (2014). Consumption-driven market emergence. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1086/673196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mian, S., Lamine, W., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Technology business incubation: An overview of the state of knowledge. Technovation, 50–51, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, P. D., Roberts, J. H., & von Hippel, E. (2000). Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market. Management Science, 46(12), 1513–1527. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1513.12076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñiz, A. M., & O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.1086/319618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñiz, A. M., Jr, & Schau, H. J. (2011). How to inspire value-laden collaborative consumer-generated content. Business Horizons, 54(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakassis, C. V. (2013). Brands and their surfeits. Cultural Anthropology, 28(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2012.01176.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan, P., Han, S., & Graebner, M. E. (2017). Single cases: The what, why, and how. In M. Raza & S. Jain (Eds.), Routledge companion to qualitative research in organization studies (pp. 92–112). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J. (2018). Dying for a paycheck: How modern management harms employee health and company performance—and what we can do about it. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, R., & Wong, C. (eds.). (2017). Handbook of community well-being research. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Pongsakornrungsilp, S., & Schroeder, J. E. (2011). Understanding value co-creation in a co-consuming brand community. Marketing Theory, 11(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., & Jurgenson, N. (2010). Production, consumption, prosumption: The nature of capitalism in the age of the digital ‘prosumer’. Journal of Consumer Culture, 10(1), 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaraboto, D. (2015). Selling, sharing, and everything in between: The hybrid economies of collaborative networks. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(1), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schau, H. J., Muñiz, A. M., & Arnould, E. J. (2009). How brand community practices create value. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.5.30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schouten, J. W., & McAlexander, J. H. (1995). Subcultures of consumption: An ethnography of the new bikers. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/209434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweisfurth, T. G., & Raasch, C. (2015). Embedded lead users - The benefits of employing users for corporate innovation. Research Policy, 44(1), 168–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, S., & Tripsas, M. (2016). When do user innovators start firms? A theory of user entrepreneurship. In D. Harhoff & K. Lakhani (Eds.), Revolutionizing innovation: Users, communities and open innovation (pp. 285–307). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. K., & Tripsas, M. (2007). The accidental entrepreneur: The emergent and collective process of user entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, C. J., Rahtz, D. R., & Sirgy, M. J. (2017). Distinguishing flourishing from distressed communities: Vulnerability, resilience and a systemic framework to facilitate well-being. In R. Phillips & C. Wong (Eds.), Handbook of community well-being research (pp. 403–421). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims, J., & Woodard, C. J. (2020). Community interactions at crowd scale: Hybrid crowds on the GitHub platform. Innovation: Organization & Management, 22(2), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2019.1585860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirgy, M. J., Lee, D. J., & Rahtz, D. (2007). Research on consumer well-being (CWB): Overview of the field and introduction to the special issue. Journal of Macromarketing, 27(4), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146707307212
   Google Scholar
• Syrjälä, H. (2016). Turning point of transformation: Consumer communities, identity projects and becoming a serious dog hobbyist. Journal of Business Research, 69(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripsas, M., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal, 21(10‐11), 1147–1161. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1147::AID-SMJ128>3.0.CO;2-R
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.7.791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. (2017). Free innovation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2001). Innovation by user communities: Learning from open-source software. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(4), 82. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/innovation-by-user-communities-learning-from-opensource-software/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E. (2007). Horizontal innovation networks - by and for users. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, E., De Jong, J. P., & Flowers, S. (2012). Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative study in the United Kingdom. Management Science, 58(9), 1669–1681. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2017). Case study research. Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zaggl, M. A. (2017). Manipulation of explicit reputation in innovation and knowledge exchange communities: The example of referencing in science. Research Policy, 46(5), 970–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar