How R&D subsidies alter firm activities and behaviour

References

• Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one?: Additionality effects of R&D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806–822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar, L., & Gagnepain, P. (2017). European cooperative R&D and firm performance: Evidence based on funding differences in key actions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 53, 1–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2016.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. (1994). The production ans distribution of knowledge. The economics of growth and technical change: Technologies, nations, agents. (G. Silverberg & L. Soete, Eds.). (pp. 9–19). Aldershot: Edgard Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–625). Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge bases and regional innovation systems: Comparing Nordic clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173–1190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E., Kanninen, S., & Gustafsson, R. (2008). First-and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Research Policy, 37(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Autio, E. (1997). New, technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research Policy, 26(3), 263–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00906-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernini, C., Cerqua, A., & Pellegrini, G. (2017). Public subsidies, TFP and efficiency: A tale of complex relationships. Research Policy, 46(4), 751–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, M., Murtinu, S., & Scalera, V. G. (2019). R&D subsidies as dual signals in technological collaborations. Research Policy, 48(9), 103821. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodas Freitas, I., Castellacci, F., Fontana, R., Malerba, F., & Vezzulli, A. (2017). Sectors and the additionality effects of R&D tax credits: A cross-country microeconometric analysis. Research Policy, 46(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bræin, L., Hervik, A., Bremnes, H., & Bergem, B. G. (2009). Resultatmåling av brukerstyrt forskning 2007. Møreforsking.
   Google Scholar
• Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2016). The impact of R&D subsidies on firm innovation. Research Policy, 45(2), 442–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4–6), 587–600. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1995.025644
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerulli, G., Gabriele, R., & Potì, B. (2016). The role of firm R&D effort and collaboration as mediating drivers of innovation policy effectiveness. Industry and Innovation, 23(5), 426–447. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1169159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G., & Hewitt-Dundas, N. (2018). The effect of public support on senior manager attitudes to innovation. Technovation, 69, 28–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, G., Lucena, A., & Afcha, S. (2018). R&D subsidies & external collaborative breadth: Differential gains and the role of collaboration experience. Research Policy, 47(3), 623–636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chidamber, A., Shyam, R., & Henry, B. (1994). Research retrospective of innovation inception and success: The technology-push, demand-pull question. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(1), 94–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1994.025565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciabuschi, F., Baraldi, E., Lindahl, O., & Callegari, S. (2020). Supporting innovation against the threat of antibiotic resistance: Exploring the impact of public incentives on firm performance and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Business Research, 112, 271–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38(10), 1517–1533. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czarnitzki, D., & Hussinger, K. (2018). Input and output additionality of R&D subsidies. Applied Economics, 50(12), 1324–1341. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1361010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, S., Davies, J., & Grimes, C. (1999). Collaborative research programmes: Building trust from difference. Technovation, 19(1), 31–40. <go to isi>://WOS:000078110800002. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00083-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, S., Grimes, C., & Davies, J. (1998). Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: A New Zealand case study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimos, C., & Pugh, G. (2016). The effectiveness of R&D subsidies: A meta-regression analysis of the evaluation literature. Research Policy, 45(4), 797–815. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont, M. (2017). Assessing the policy mix of public support to business R&D. Research Policy, 46(10), 1851–1862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falk, R. (2007). Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms’ innovation activities: Survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy, 36(5), 665–679. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., & Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the commercialization of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenz, M., & Ietto-Gillies, G. (2009). The impact on innovation performance of different sources of knowledge: Evidence from the UK Community Innovation Survey. Research Policy, 38(7), 1125–1135. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Zahra, S. A., & Wood, D. R. (2002). The effects of business–university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: A study of publicly traded biotechnology companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(6), 577–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00069-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., Clarysse, B., & Steurs, G. (2004). ‘Making the difference’: The evaluation of’behavioural additionality’of R & D subsidies. IWT.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L., & Clarysse, B. (2006). Introduction and synthesis, in government R&D funding and company behaviour. In Measuring behavioural additionality (pp. 9–38). OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. (2002). Additionality and impact of R&D subsidies. IWT Studies, 40, 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Georghiou, L. (2007). What lies beneath: Avoiding the risk of under-evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 34(10), 743–752. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X259003
   Google Scholar
• Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., & Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research. Organizational Research Methods, 16(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112452151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gök, A., & Edler, J. (2012). The use of behavioural additionality evaluation in innovation policy making. Research Evaluation, 21(4), 306–318. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrera, L., & Sánchez-González, G. (2013). Firm size and innovation policy. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 31(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611405553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervas-Oliver, J.-L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., & Boronat-Moll, C. (2014). Process innovation strategy in SMEs, organizational innovation and performance: A misleading debate? Small Business Economics, 43(4), 873–886. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9567-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. T. (2017). Financing innovation: Evidence from R&D grants. American Economic Review, 107(4), 1136–1164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, F.-M., Horng, D.-J., & Hsueh, -C.-C. (2009). The effect of government-sponsored R&D programmes on additionality in recipient firms in Taiwan. Technovation, 29(3), 204–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hud, M., & Hussinger, K. J. R. (2015). The impact of R&D subsidies during the crisis. Research Policy, 44(10), 1844–1855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hünermund, P., & Czarnitzki, D. (2019). Estimating the causal effect of R&D subsidies in a pan-European program. Research Policy, 48(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. (2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183–1194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/3069433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knockaert, M., Spithoven, A., & Clarysse, B. (2014). The impact of technology intermediaries on firm cognitive capacity additionality. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 376–387. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobarg, S., Stumpf-Wollersheim, J., & Welpe, I. M. (2019). More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level. Research Policy, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kochenkova, A., Grimaldi, R., & Munari, F. (2016). Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities: A review of academic literature [journal article]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9416-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Wright, M., & Frattini, F. (2018). Organizational goals: Antecedents, formation processes and implications for firm behavior and performance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(S1), S3–S18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12170
   Google Scholar
• Lanahan, L., & Feldman, M. P. (2015). Multilevel innovation policy mix: A closer look at state policies that augment the federal SBIR program. Research Policy, 44(7), 1387–1402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidique, M. A., & Zirger, B. J. (1985). The new product learning cycle. Research Policy, 14(6), 299–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90001-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marino, M., Lhuillery, S., Parrotta, P., & Sala, D. (2016). Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy, 45(9), 1715–1730. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, C. M., & O’Connor, G. C. (2002). Managing radical innovation: An overview of emergent strategy issues. Journal of Product Innovation Management: An International Publication of the Product Development & Management Association, 19(6), 424–438. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1960424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, G. S., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. L. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00030-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menguc, B., Auh, S., & Yannopoulos, P. (2014). Customer and supplier involvement in design: The moderating role of incremental and radical innovation capability. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 313–328. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meuleman, M., & De Maeseneire, W. (2012). Do R&D subsidies affect SMEs’ access to external financing? Research Policy, 41(3), 580–591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. C., Cardinal, L. B., & Glick, W. H. (1997). Retrospective reports in organizational research: A reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 189–204. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/257026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nag, R., Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). The intersection of organizational identity, knowledge, and practice: Attempting strategic change via knowledge grafting. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 821–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67(3), 297–306. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/258177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, H., & Liu, Y. (2018). How government subsidies promote the growth of entrepreneurial companies in clean energy industry: An empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 508–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radicic, D., & Pugh, G. (2017). R&D programmes, policy mix, and the ‘european paradox’: Evidence from European SMEs. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderblom, A., Samuelsson, M., Wiklund, J., & Sandberg, R. (2015). Inside the black box of outcome additionality: Effects of early-stage government subsidies on resource accumulation and new venture performance [Article]. Research Policy, 44(8), 1501–1512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinmo, M., & Rasmussen, E. (2016). How firms collaborate with public research organizations: The evolution of proximity dimensions in successful innovation projects. Journal of Business Research, 69(3), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczygielski, K., Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, M. T., & Tandogan, V. S. (2017). Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries. Research Policy, 46(1), 219–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szücs, F. (2018). Research subsidies, industry–university cooperation and innovation. Research Policy, 47(7), 1256–1266. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torregrosa-Hetland, S., Pelkonen, A., Oksanen, J., & Kander, A. (2019). The prevalence of publicly stimulated innovations –A comparison of Finland and Sweden, 1970–2013. Research Policy, 48(6), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanino, E., Roper, S., & Becker, B. (2019). Knowledge to money: Assessing the business performance effects of publicly-funded R&D grants. Research Policy, 48(7), 1714–1737. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Li, J., & Furman, J. L. (2017). Firm performance and state innovation funding: Evidence from China’s Innofund program. Research Policy, 46(6), 1142–1161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., Scherngell, T., & Fischer, M. M. (2013). How do firm characteristics affect behavioural additionalities of public R&D subsidies? Evidence for the Austrian transport sector. Technovation, 33(2–3), 66–77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., Murphree, M., Meng, S., & Li, S. (2021). The more the merrier? Chinese government R&D subsidies, dependence, and firm innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research. Design and methods (Vol. 5). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, B., & Ziedonis, R. H. (2012). State governments as financiers of technology startups: Implications for firm performance. SSRN Electronic Journal. Available at SSRN 2060739. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2060739.
   Google Scholar
• Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á., Alonso-Borrego, C., Forcadell, F. J., & Galán, J. I. (2014). Assesing the effect of public subsidies on firm R&D investment: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 28(1), 36–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00738.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar