How virtual meetings stimulate process innovations in organisations: mixed-methods evidence from emergency response providers

References

• Acar, O. A., Tarakci, M., & van Knippenberg, D. (2019). Creativity and innovation under constraints: A cross-disciplinary integrative review. Journal of Management, 45(1), 96–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318805832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahrendt, D., Cabrita, J., Clerici, E., Hurley, J., Leončikas, T., Mascherini, M., … Sandor, E. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19. Eurofond (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/76040
   Google Scholar
• Allison, B. B., Shuffler, M. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2015). The successful facilitation of virtual team meetings. In J. A. Allen, N. Lehmann-Willenbrock, & S. G. Rogelberg (Eds.), Cambridge handbooks in psychology. The Cambridge handbook of meeting science (pp. 680–706). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.029
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. A., Campion, E. D., Keeler, K. R., & Keener, S. K. (2021). Videoconference fatigue? Exploring changes in fatigue after videoconference meetings during COVID-19. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(3), 330–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos-Nehles, A., Renkema, M., & Janssen, M. (2017). HRM and innovative work behaviour: A systematic literature review. Personnel Review, 46(7), 1228–1253. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkland, S., Zachariassen, F., & Oliveira, J. (2019). Meeting up for management control: Bracketing interaction in innovation development. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 16(1), 144–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-06-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denstadli, J. M., Julsrud, T. E., & Hjorthol, R. J. (2012). Videoconferencing as a mode of communication: A comparative study of the use of videoconferencing and face-to-face meetings. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911421125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feilzer, Y. M. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 4(1), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809349691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortwengel, J., Schüßler, E., & Sydow, J. (2017). Studying organizational creativity as process: Fluidity or duality? Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, J., Vom Brocke, J., Handali, J., Otto, M., & Schneider, J. (2020). Virtually in this together: How web-conferencing systems enabled a new virtual togetherness during the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819900585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattke, F., & Martin, H. (2020). Collective action during the Covid-19 pandemic: The case of Germany’s fragmented authority. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(4), 614–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2020.1805273
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heisig, P., & Kannan, S. (2020). Knowledge management: Does gender matter? A systematic review of literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(6), 1315–1342. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2018-0472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homberg, F., Vogel, R., & Weiherl, J. (2019). Public service motivation and continuous organizational change: Taking charge behaviour at police services. Public Administration, 97(1), 28–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kauffeld, S., & Lehmann-Willenbrock, N. (2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411429599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kniffin, K. M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S. P., Bakker, A. B., Bamberger, P., Bapuji, H., Bhave, D. P., Choi, V. K., Creary, S. J., Demerouti, E., Flynn, F. J., Gelfand, M. J., Greer, L. L., Johns, G., Kesebir, S., Klein, P. G., Lee, S. Y., & van Vugt, M. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampel, J., Honig, B., & Drori, I. (2014). Organizational ingenuity: Concept, processes and strategies. Organization Studies, 35(4), 465–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614525321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. (2013). The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick, E. von Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 159–176). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meinecke, A., Allen, J. A., and Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., (Eds.) (2020). Managing meetings in organizations (Vol. 20, 278 pp). Research on managing groups and teams. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing. https://www.emerald.com/insight/publication/doi/10.1108/S1534-0856202020
   Google Scholar
• Mroz, J. E., Allen, J. A., Verhoeven, D. C., & Shuffler, M. L. (2018). Do we really need another meeting? The science of workplace meetings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418776307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortmann, G., & Sydow, J. (2018). Dancing in chains: Creative practices in/of organizations. Organization Studies, 39(7), 899–921. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840617717096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulus, P. B., Nakui, T., Putman, V. L., & Brown, V. R. (2006). Effects of task instructions and brief breaks on brainstorming. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 10(3), 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.10.3.206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, J., & Kastelle, T. (2010). Public sector innovation research: What’s next? Innovation, 12(2), 122–137. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.12.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlbacher, F. (2020). Meetings as organizational strategy for planned emergence. In A. Meinecke, J. A. Allen, & N. Lehmann-Willenbrock (Eds.), Managing meetings in organizations. (Research on Managing Groups and Teams) (Vol. 20, pp. 251–273). https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-085620200000020018
   Google Scholar
• Redlbacher, F., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Frost, J. (2022). How “mms” trigger novel ideas: An inductive field study of conversational interaction dynamics in agile meetings. In G. Cattani, D. Deichmann, and S. Ferriani (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: Vol. 77. The generation, recognition and legitimation of novelty (pp. 137–160). Emerald Publishing Ltd. https://www.doi.org/10.1108/S0733-558X20220000077011
   Google Scholar
• Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, J. A., Shanock, L., Scott, C., & Shuffler, M. (2010). Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rollof, J. (2009). Creative meetings. Innovation, 11(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.5172/impp.11.3.357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosso, B. D. (2014). Creativity and constraints: Exploring the role of constraints in the creative processes of research and development teams. Organization Studies, 35(4), 551–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research. Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standaert, W., Muylle, S., & Basu, A. (2021). How shall we meet? Understanding the importance of meeting mode capabilities for different meeting objectives. Information & Management, 58(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2020.103393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2020). Virtual collaboration won’t be the death of creativity: Shifting to remote work can help groups generate better ideas - And more of them. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62(2), 42–46. https://mitsmr.com/3n1A5Hy
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, B., & Black, R. W. (2021). Work online, welfare calls, and wine night: Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals’ technology use. Advance online publication. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2101.07388
   Google Scholar
• van Loon, N. M., Leisink, P. L. M., Knies, E., & Brewer, G. A. (2016). Red tape: Developing and validating a new job-centered measure. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oortmerssen, L. A., van Woerkum, C. M. J., & Aarts, N. (2015). When interaction flows: An exploration of collective creative processes on a collaborative governance board. Group & Organization Management, 40(4), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, R., & Werkmeister, L. (2021). What is public about public leadership? Exploring implicit public leadership theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 31(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkoff, O., & Strong, D. M. (2017). Affordance theory and how to use it in IS research. In R. D. Galliers & M.-K. Stein (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Management Information Systems (pp. 232–245). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Whillans, A., Perlow, L., & Turek, A. (2021). Experimenting during the shift to virtual team work: Learnings from how teams adapted their activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Information and Organization, 31(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2021.100343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar