How do ideas gain legitimacy in internal crowdsourcing idea development? Exploring the effects of feedback on idea selection

References

• Afuah, A., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). Crowdsourcing as a solution to distant search. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 355–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. H., & Nelson, F. D. (1984). Linear probability, logit, and probit models (no. 45). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P. D. (1999). Multicollinearity. In Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application (pp. 48–51).
   Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., & Locke, E. A. (2004). Benefiting from negative feedback. Human Resource Management Review, 13(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2003.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Beretta, M. (2019). Idea selection in web‐enabled ideation systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12439
   Google Scholar
• Beretta, M., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2021). Employee behaviours beyond innovators in internal crowdsourcing: What do employees do in internal crowdsourcing, if not innovating, and why? Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 542–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergendahl, M., & Magnusson, M. (2015). Creating ideas for innovation: Effects of organizational distance on knowledge creation processes. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunduchi, R. (2017). Legitimacy‐seeking mechanisms in product innovation: A qualitative study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W., Li, S. Y., Ni, J., & Zhu, J. J. (2021). What feedback matters? The role of experience in motivating crowdsourcing innovation. Production and Operations Management, 30(1), 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. W., Li, S. Y., & Zhu, J. J. (2018). Good to be novel? Understanding how idea feasibility affects idea adoption decision making in crowdsourcing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 43, 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Magnusson, M., & Björk, J. (2020). Collective firm-internal online idea development: Exploring the impact of feedback timeliness and knowledge overlap. European Journal of Innovation Management, 23(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Magnusson, M., & Björk, J. (2022). Exploring the effects of problem- and solution-related knowledge sharing in internal crowdsourcing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(11), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2021-0769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 41(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coussement, K., Debaere, S., & De Ruyck, T. (2017). Inferior member participation identification in innovation communities: The signaling role of linguistic style use. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 565–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deichmann, D., Gillier, T., & Tonellato, M. (2021). Getting on board with new ideas: An analysis of idea commitments on a crowdsourcing platform. Research Policy, 50(9), 104320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGangi, P. M., & Wasko, M. (2009). Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of dell IdeaStorm. Decision Support Systems, 48(1), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Vincenzo, F., Mascia, D., Björk, J., & Magnusson, M. (2020). Attention to ideas! Exploring idea survival in internal crowdsourcing. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-03-2019-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Lautenbach, S., Marquéz J. R., Gruber B., Lafourcade B., Leitão P. J., Münkemüller T. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dougherty, D., & Heller, T. (1994). The illegitimacy of successful product innovation in established firms. Organization Science, 5(2), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drori, I., & Honig, B. (2013). A process model of internal and external legitimacy. Organization Studies, 34(3), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612467153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, D., Holderness, D. K., Jr., Olsen, K. J., & Thornock, T. A. (2022). Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 99, 101329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florén, H., & Frishammar, J. (2012). From preliminary ideas to corroborated product definitions: Managing the front end of new product development. California Management Review, 54(4), 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, E., & Magnusson, M. (2014). Dealing with legitimacy: A key challenge for Project Portfolio Management decision makers. International Journal of Project Management, 32(1), 30–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heusinkveld, S., & Reijers, H. A. (2009). Reflections on a reflective cycle: Building legitimacy in design knowledge development. Organization Studies, 30(8), 865–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609334953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoornaert, S., Ballings, M., Malthouse, E. C., & Van den Poel, D. (2017). Identifying new product ideas: Waiting for the wisdom of the crowd or screening ideas in real time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 580–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornik, K., & Grün, B. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(13), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v040.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacobucci, D., Schneider, M. J., Popovich, D. L., & Bakamitsos, G. A. (2016). Mean centering helps alleviate “micro” but not “macro” multicollinearity. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1308–1317. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0624-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, S. B. (2013). The Process of Legitimising: How practitioners gain legitimacy for sustainability within their organisation. University of Edinburgh Business School.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M. B., Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2014). Forecasting the commercial attractiveness of user‐generated designs using online data: An empirical study within the LEGO user community. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31, 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., & Wang, Y. (2020). A theoretical and empirical investigation of feedback in ideation contests. Production and Operations Management, 29(2), 481–500. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. (2017). Package ‘syuzhet’. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/syuzhet
   Google Scholar
• Jost, L. (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos, 113(2), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurka, T. P. (2012). Sentiment, R package. Retrieved January, 2016, from http://www.inside-r.org/packages/cran/sentiment
   Google Scholar
• Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: Gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613517596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan-Narasimhan, R. (2014). Organizational ingenuity in nascent innovations: Gaining resources and legitimacy through unconventional actions. Organization Studies, 35(4), 483–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kijkuit, B., & Van Den Ende, J. (2007). The organizational life of an idea: Integrating social network, creativity and decision‐making perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 863–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00695.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruft, T., Tilsner, C., Schindler, A., & Kock, A. (2019). Persuasion in corporate idea contests: The moderating role of content scarcity on decision‐making. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(5), 560–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, J., McDermott, J., Simon, D. P., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Expert and novice performance in solving physics problems. Science, 208(4450), 1335–1342. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.208.4450.1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, T., Puck, J., & Verbeke, A. (2020). Misconceptions about multicollinearity in international business research: Identification, consequences, and remedies. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(3), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00257-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masisi, L., Nelwamondo, V., & Marwala, T. (2008, November). The use of entropy to measure structural diversity. 2008 IEEE International Conference on Computational Cybernetics, Stara Lesna, Slovakia (pp. 41–45). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• McGarrell, H., & Verbeem, J. (2007). Motivating revision of drafts through formative feedback. ELT Journal, 61(3), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm030
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasukawa, T., & Yi, J. (2003). Sentiment analysis: Capturing favorability using natural language processing. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Knowledge Capture, Sanibel Island, FL, USA (pp. 70–77). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/945645.945658
   Google Scholar
• Ogink, T., & Dong, J. Q. (2019). Stimulating innovation by user feedback on social media: The case of an online user innovation community. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 144, 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Leary, D. E. (2016). On the relationship between number of votes and sentiment in crowdsourcing ideas and comments for innovation: A case study of Canada’s digital compass. Decision Support Systems, 88, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2016.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özaygen, A., & Balagué, C. (2018). Idea evaluation in innovation contest platforms: A network perspective. Decision Support Systems, 112, 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, S. A. (2016). Find an expert: Designing expert selection interfaces for formal help-giving. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, California, USA (pp. 3038–3048). ACM.r
   Google Scholar
• Piezunka, H., & Dahlander, L. (2015). Distant search, narrow attention: How crowding alters organizations’ filtering of suggestions in crowdsourcing. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 856–880.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Wang, M., Roldan, J. L., & Kunasekaran, P. (2021). Are we in right path for mediation analysis? Reviewing the literature and proposing robust guidelines. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 48, 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz, É., & Beretta, M. (2021). Managing internal and external crowdsourcing: An investigation of emerging challenges in the context of a less experienced firm. Technovation, 106, 102290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemmann, B., Herrmann, A. M., Chappin, M. M., & Heimeriks, G. J. (2016). Crowdsourcing ideas: Involving ordinary users in the ideation phase of new product development. Research Policy, 45(6), 1145–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingley, D., Yamamoto, T., Hirose, K., Keele, L., & Imai, K. (2014). Mediation: R package for causal mediation analysis. Journal of Statistical Software, 59(5). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v059.i05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vatcheva, K. P., Lee, M., McCormick, J. B., & Rahbar, M. H. (2016). Multicollinearity in regression analyses conducted in epidemiologic studies. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale, Calif.), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1165.1000227.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wooten, J., & Ulrich, K. (2017). Idea generation and the role of feedback: Evidence from field experiments with innovation tournaments. Production and Operations Management, 26(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. The Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., Kock, A., Wentker, M., & Leker, J. (2019). How does online interaction affect idea quality? The effect of feedback in firm‐internal idea competitions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. J., Li, S. Y., & Andrews, M. (2017). Ideator expertise and cocreator inputs in crowdsourcing based new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(5), 598–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar