Social networks and novelty recognition: a review and research agenda

References

• Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. (1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery: This source of resistance has yet to be given the scrutiny accorded religious and ideological sources. Science, 134(3479), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3479.596
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg, J. M. (2016). Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(3), 433–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216642211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. M. (2022). One-hit wonders versus hit makers: Sustaining success in creative industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 630–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221083650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boudreau, K. J., Guinan, E. C., Lakhani, K. R., & Riedl, C. (2016). Looking across and looking beyond the knowledge frontier: Intellectual distance, novelty, and resource allocation in science. Management Science, 62(10), 2765–2783. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518–539. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennecke, J. (2020). Dissonant ties in intraorganizational networks: Why individuals seek problem-solving assistance from difficult colleagues. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 743–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkus, D. (2013). The myths of creativity: The truth about how innovative companies and people generate great ideas. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retentions in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review, 67(6), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catmull, E., & Wallace, A. (2014). Creativity Inc.: Overcoming the unseen forces that stand in the way of true inspiration. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Deichmann, D., & Ferriani, S. (2022). Novelty: Searching for, seeing, and sustaining it. In G. Cattani, D. Deichmann, & S. Ferriani (Eds.), The generation, recognition, and legitimation of novelty (pp. 3–23). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievement in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Allison, P. D. (2014). Insiders, outsiders, and the struggle for consecration in cultural fields: A core-periphery perspective. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414520960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Colucci, M. (2015). Creativity in social networks: A core-periphery perspectiv. In C. Jones, M. Lazersen, & J. Sapsed (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creative industries (pp. 75–95). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cattani, G., Ferriani, S., & Lanza, A. (2017). Deconstructing the outsider puzzle: The legitimation journey of novelty. Organization Science, 28(6), 965–992. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 721–739. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., Dahlander, L., Grohsjean, T., & Salter, A. (2017). Evaluating novelty: The role of panels in the selection of R&D projects. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 433–460. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihályi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlander, L., & Frederiksen, L. (2012). The core and cosmopolitans: A relational view of innovation in user communities. Organization Science, 23(4), 988–1007. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falchetti, D., Cattani, G., & Ferriani, S. (2022). Start with “why,” but only if you have to: The strategic framing of novel ideas across different audiences. Strategic Management Journal, 43(1), 130–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 443–475. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giarratana, M., Mariani, M., & Weller, I. (2017). Rewards for patents and inventors’ behavior in industrial R&D. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 61,264–292. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0633
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, S. H., & Nurmohamed, S. (2023). Dirty creativity: An inductive study of how creative workers champion new designs that are stigmatized. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 175, 104224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2022.104224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Berry, J. W. (2023). Toward a meta-theory of creativity forms: How novelty and usefulness shape creativity. Academy of Management Review, 48(3), 504–529. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945. https://doi.org/10.2307/259249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampraki, A., Kolympiris, C., Grohsjean, T., & Dahlander, L. (2024). The new needs friends: Simmelian strangers and the selection of novelty. Strategic Management Journal, 45(4), 716–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, V., & Landis, B. (2023). Spotting novelty: How Tertius Iungens brokers recognize novel ideas. In K. J. Sund, J. Csonka-Peeren, & S. Mozheiko ( Chairs), Entrepreneurial Cognition PDW [Paper presentation]. 83rd Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Lingo, E. L., & O’Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 47–81. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.47
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, S., Bartol, K. M., Venkataramani, V., Zheng, X., & Liu, X. (2019). Pitching novel ideas to the boss: The interactive effects of employees’ idea enactment and influence tactics on creativity assessment and implementation. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 579–606. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainemelis, C., & Sakellariou, E. (2023). Creativity and the arts of disguise: Switching between formal and informal channels in the evolution of creative projects. Organization Science, 34(1), 380–403. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1993). Approaches to a psychology of value. In M. Hechter, L. Nadel, & R. E. Michod (Eds.), The origin of values (pp. 229–258). Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Mandler, G. (1995). Origins and consequences of novelty. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, & R. A. Finke (Eds.), The creative cognition approach (pp. 9–25). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mannucci, P. V. (2017). Drawing Snow White and animating Buzz Lightyear: Technological toolkit characteristics and creativity in cross-disciplinary teams. Organization Science, 28(4), 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannucci, P. V., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2022). “Who are you going to call?” Network activation in creative idea generation and elaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 65(4), 1192–1217. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mount, M. P., Baer, M., & Lupoli, M. J. (2021). Quantum leaps or baby steps? Expertise distance, construal level, and the propensity to invest in novel technological ideas. Strategic Management Journal, 42(8), 1490–1515. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611421018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., Melwani, S., Loewenstein, J., & Deal, J. (2018). Reframing the decision-makers’ dilemma: Towards a social context model of creative idea recognition. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. S., Wakslak, C. J., & Krishnan, V. (2014). Construing creativity: The how and why of recognizing creative ideas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, J., & Yin, Y. (2021). Unraveling the bias against novelty: Guiding the study of our tendency to desire but reject the new. In J. Zhou & E. D. Rouse (Eds.), Handbook of research on creativity and innovation (pp. 267–289). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, S. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2020). From ugly duckling to swan: A social networks perspective on novelty recognition and creativity. In D. J. Brass & S. Borgatti (Eds.), Social networks at work (pp. 177–199). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry-Smith, J. E., & Shalley, C. E. (2014). A social composition view of team creativity: The role of member nationality-heterogeneous ties outside of the team. Organization Science, 25(5), 1434–1452. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/323038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, D., & Fath, S. (2021). Signaling creative genius: How perceived social connectedness influences judgments of creative potential. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(4), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220936061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee, L., & Leonardi, P. M. (2018). Which pathway to good ideas? An attention‐based view of innovation in social networks. Strategic Management Journal, 39(4), 1188–1215. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgourev, S. V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science, 24(6), 1601–1617. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmel, G. (1950). The stranger. In K. H. Wolff (Ed.), The sociology of Georg Simmel (pp. 402–409). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (1998). Fickle fashion versus immortal fame: Transhistorical assessments of creative products in the opera house. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475–494. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M. (1995). Why no one really wants creativity. In C. M. Ford & D. A. Gioia (Eds.), Creative action in organizations: Ivory Tower visions and real world voices (pp. 161–172). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L., Criscuolo, P., McEvily, B., & Salter, A. (2020). Dual networking: How collaborators network in their quest for innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(4), 887–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219893691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Wal, A. L., Criscuolo, P., & Salter, A. (2023). Inside-out, outside-in, or all-in-one? The role of network sequencing in the elaboration of ideas. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 432–461. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortoriello, M., & Krackhardt, D. (2010). Activating cross-boundary knowledge: The role of simmelian ties in the generation of innovations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkataramani, V., Richter, A. W., & Clarke, R. (2014). Creative benefits from well-connected leaders: Leader social network ties as facilitators of employee radical creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 966–975. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Bavato, D., Tasselli, S., & Wu, J. (2019). Understanding the receiving side of creativity: A multidisciplinary review and implications for management research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2570–2595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206319827088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, J., Wang, X., Song, J., & Wu, J. (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar