References
- Bammer, G. (2012). Strengthening interdisciplinary research: what it is, what it does, how it does it and how it is supported. Canberra, ACT: Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies. htto://:www.acola.org.au
- Coetzer, A., Redmond, J., & Sharafizad, J. (2012). ‘Using the critical incident technique to research decision making regarding access to training and development in medium-sized enterprises’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 164–178.
- Gemici, S., Bednarz, A., & Lim, P. (2012). ‘A primer for handling missing values in the analysis of education and training data’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 233–250.
- Gemici, S., Rojewski, J.W., & Lee, I.H. (2012). ‘Use of propensity score matching for training research with observational data’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 219–232.
- Lassnigg, L. (2012). ‘“Use of current best evidence”: Promises and illusions, limitations and contradictions in the triangle of research, policy and practice’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3),179–203.
- Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (eds.) 2008. Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research. UNEVOC and Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
- Shore, S. & Butler, B. (2012). ‘Missing things and methodological swerves: unsettling the it-ness of VET’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 204–218.
- Smith, E. (2012). ‘Getting in through the front door: The first hurdle of researching in companies’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 153–163.
- Smith, E. & Clayton, B. (2012). ‘Principles & practice: How vocational education and training researchers use theory in their research’, International Journal of Training Research, 10(3), 251–258.