516
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Cost-benefit paradigm of apprenticeship training: reviewing some existing literature

, &
Pages 76-83 | Received 31 Dec 2012, Accepted 17 Oct 2015, Published online: 26 Apr 2016

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1998). Why do firms train? Theory and evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 79–119.
  • Acemoglu, D., & Pischke, J. S. (1999). Beyond Becker: Training in imperfect labour markets. The Economic Journal, 109(453), 112–142.
  • Asghar, W., & Siddi, H. (2008). Apprenticeship training in Pakistan: A comparative study of apprenticeship practices in punjab and European countries. International Journal of Training Research, 6(2), 1–19.10.5172/ijtr.6.2.1
  • Becker, G. (1964). Human capital. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Beckmann, M. (2002). Firm-sponsored apprenticeship training in Germany: Empirical evidence from establishment data. Labour, 16, 287–310.10.1111/labr.2002.16.issue-2
  • Berryman, S. (1991). Designing effective learning environments: Cognitive apprenticeship models. ERIC Document, 337(689), 1–5.
  • Blundell, R., Dearden, L., Meghir, C., & Sianesi, B. (1999). Human capital investment: The returns from education and training to the individual, the firm and the economy. Fiscal Studies, 20(1), 1–23.
  • Booth, A. L., & Zoega, G. (2004). Is wage compression a necessary condition for firm-financed general training? Oxford Economic Papers, 56(1), 88–97.
  • Dearden, L., Reed, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2005). The impact of training on productivity and wages: Evidence from British panel data. CEP Discussion Paper No. 674.
  • Dockery, A. M., Norris, K., & Stromback, T. (1998). The Social Return to Apprenticeship Training. The Australian Economic Review, 31(1), 37–46.
  • Dionisius, R., Muehlemann, S., Pfeifer, H., Walden, G., Wenzelmann, F., & Wolter, C. (2008). Cost and benefit of apprenticeship training – A comparison of Germany and Switzerland. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3465. Bonn: IZA.
  • Elbaum, B., & Singh, N. (1995). The economic rationale of apprenticeship training: Some lessons from British and US experience. Industrial Relations, 34, 593–622.
  • Euwals, R., & Winkelmann, R. (2001). Why do firms train? Empirical evidence on the first labour market outcomes of graduated apprentices. Discussion Paper No. 319, IZA, Bonn.
  • Fersterer, J., Pischk, J., & Winter-Ebmer, R. (2008). Returns to apprenticeship training in Austria: Evidence from failed firms. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 110, 733–753.10.1111/sjoe.2008.110.issue-4
  • Franz, W., & Soskice, D. (1995). The German apprenticeship system. In F. Buttler, W. Franz, R. Schettkat, & D. Soskice (Eds.), Institutional frameworks and labor market performance (pp. 208–234). London: Routledge.
  • Hanushek, A., & Kimko, D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. The American Economic Review, 90, 1184–1208.10.1257/aer.90.5.1184
  • Harhoff, D., & Kane, T. J. (1997). Is the German apprenticeship system a panacea for the US labor market? Journal of Population Economics, 10(2), 171–196.
  • Hasluck, C., Hogarth, T., Adam, D., Baldauf, B., & Briscoe, G. (2008). The net benefit to employer investment in apprenticeship training A report for the Apprenticeship Ambassadors Network, Institute for Employment Research. University of Warwick.
  • Hendricks, L. (2002). How important is human capital for development? evidence from immigrant earnings. The American Economic Review, 92, 198–219.10.1257/000282802760015676
  • Hogarth, T., & Hasluck, C. (2003). Net costs of modern apprenticeship training to employers Research Report No. 418. Institute for Employment Research.
  • Hogarth, T., Siora, G., Briscoe, G., & Hasluck, C. (1996). The Net Costs of Training to Employers. Nottingham: Department for Employment Research Series, DfES Research Report RR418.
  • Lindley, R. M. (1975). The demand for apprentice recruits by the engineering industry, 1951–71. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 22(1), 1–24.
  • Kavanagh, J. (2005). Determinants of productivity for military personnel: A review of findings on the contribution of experience, training, and aptitude to military performance. United States Armed Forces Personnel Management, 153(38).
  • Kennedy, S., Drago, R., Sloan, J., & Wooden, M. (1994). The effect of trade unions on the provision of training: Australian evidence. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 32, 565–580.10.1111/bjir.1994.32.issue-4
  • Kessler, S., & Lülfesmann, C. (2000). The theory of human capital revisited: On the interaction of general and specific investments. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2533.
  • Marimuthu, M., Arokiasamy, L., & Ismail, M. (2009). Human capital development and its impact on firm performance: Evidence from developmental economics. The Journal of International Social Research, 2, 265–272.
  • McIntosh, B. (2001). An employer’s guide to older workers: How to win them back and convince them to stay. U.S. Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
  • Mohamud, M., Jennings, C., Rix, M., & Gold, J. (2006). Work‐based learning in the UK: scenarios for the future. Education + Training, 48, 440–453.10.1108/00400910610692903
  • Muehlemann, S., Pfeifer, H., Walden, G., Wenzelmann, F., & Wolter, S. C. (2010). The financing of apprenticeship training in the light of labour market regulations. Labour Economics, 17, 799–809.10.1016/j.labeco.2010.04.006
  • Niederalt, M., Schnabel, C., & Kaiser, C. (2001). Corporate training behavior between cost-benefit calculus and social responsibility: Factors influencing the training intensity of German companies ( Discussion papers No. 7). Nuremberg: University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Chair of Labour Market and Regional Policy.
  • Rothwell, J., Gerity, E., & Gaertner, A. (2004). Linking training to performance: A guide for workforce development professionals. American College of Community Colleges: Community College Press.
  • Ryan, P. (1993). Pay structures, collective bargaining and apprenticeship training in post-war British and German metalworking industry. In CEPR Workshop on Human Capital and Postwar European Economic Growth. Dublin, March.
  • Ryan, P., Gospel, H., & Lewis, P. (2007). Large employers and apprenticeship training in Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45, 127–153.10.1111/bjir.2007.45.issue-1
  • Singleton, J. (1998). Situated learning in Japan: Our educational analysis. In J. C. Singleton (Ed.), Learning in likely places: Varieties of apprenticeship in Japan (pp. 3–19). Cambridge University Press.
  • Skirbekk, V. (2003). Age and individual productivity: A literature survey Mpidr Working Paper WP 2003-028. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.
  • Soskice, D. (1994). Reconciling markets and institutions: The German apprenticeship system, In L.M. Lynch (Ed.), Training and the Private Sector, International Comparisons. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Comparative labor market series (pp. 25–60). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Steedman, H. (2001). Five years of the modern apprenticeship initiative: An assessment against continental European models. National Institute Economic Review, 178, 75–87.
  • Steedman, H., Gospel, H. F and Ryan, P. (1998). Apprenticeship: A strategy for growth. London: London School of Economics and Political Science, Centre for Economic Performance.
  • Storey, J., & Westhead, P. (1997). Management training in small firms – a case of market failure? Human Resource Management Journal, 7, 61–71.10.1111/hrmj.1997.7.issue-2
  • Sum, V. (2011). Integrating training in business strategies means greater impact of training on the firm’s competitiveness. Research in Business and Economics Journal, 4, 1–19.
  • Walden, G. (2007). Short-term and long-term benefits as determinants of the training behaviour of companies. Journal for Labour Market Research, 40, 169–191.
  • Wolter, S. C., Mühlemann, S., & Schweri, J. (2006). Why some firms train apprentices and many others do not. German Economic Review, 7, 249–264.10.1111/geer.2006.7.issue-3
  • Zwick, T. (2007). Apprenticeship training in Germany - investment or productivity driven? ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 07-023.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.