199
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Current evaluation practices of diversity trainers in German-speaking countries

, , &
Pages 148-159 | Received 07 May 2016, Accepted 23 Feb 2017, Published online: 22 Mar 2017

References

  • Alhejji, H., Garavan, T., Carbery, R., O’Brien, F., & McGuire, D. (2016). Diversity training programme outcomes: A systematic review. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 27, 95-149. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/hrdq.21221
  • Bearman, S. K., Wadkins, M., Bailin, A., & Doctoroff, G. (2015). Prepracticum training in professional psychology to close the research-practice gap: Changing attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 9, 13–20. doi:10.1037/tep0000052
  • Beelmann, A., & Karing, C. (2014). Implementationsfaktoren und -prozesse in der Präventionsforschung: Strategien, Probleme, Ergebnisse, Perspektiven [Implementation factors and processes in prevention research: Strategies, problems, results, perspectives]. Psychologische Rundschau, 65, 129–139. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000215
  • Bell, M. P., & Kravitz, D. A. (2008). From the guest co-editors: What do we know and need to learn about diversity education and training? Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 301–308. doi:10.5465/amle.2008.34251669
  • Bezrukova, K., Spell, C. S., Perry, J. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2016). A meta-analytical integration of over 40 years of research on diversity training evaluation. Psychological Bulletin, 142, 1227–1274. doi:10.1037/bul0000067
  • Bhawuk, D., & Brislin, R. (2000). Cross-cultural Training: A Review. Applied Psychology, 49, 162–191. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00009
  • Blanchard, P. N., Thacker, J. W., & Way, S. A. (2000). Training evaluation: Perspectives and evidence from Canada. International Journal of Training and Development, 4, 295–304. doi:10.1111/1468-2419.00115
  • Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69–106. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x
  • Eseryel, D. (2002). Approaches to evaluation of training: Theory and practice. Educational Technology and Society, 5, 93–98.
  • European Commission (2016). Diversity charters across the EU. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/diversity/charters/index_en.htm
  • Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs. The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler.
  • Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008). Common goals and golden opportunities: Evaluations of diversity education in academic and organizational settings. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 309–331. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2008.34251670
  • Luckerson, V. (2015, May 6). Here’s how Google plans to hire more minorities. Time. Retrieved from http://www.time.com/
  • Mertens, D. M., & Hesse-Biber, S. (2013). Mixed methods and credibility of evidence in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 138, 5–13. doi:10.1002/ev.20053
  • Michalski, G. V., & Cousins, J. B. (2001). Multiple perspectives on training evaluation: Probing stakeholder perceptions in a global network firm. American Journal of Evaluation, 22, 37–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200105
  • Moss-Racusin, C. A., van der Toorn, J., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2014). Scientific diversity interventions. Science, 343, 615–616. doi:10.1126/science.1245936
  • Pagegroup. (2014). Diversity management survey - Vielfalt leben: Ziele, Initiativen und Ausblicke für Unternehmen in Deutschland [Diversity management survey – Living diversity: Aims, initiatives, and prospects for companies in Germany]. Retrieved from http://www.michaelpage.de/sites/michaelpage.de/files/PageGroup_DIVERSITY_MANAGEMENT_SURVEY.pdf
  • Paluck, E. L. (2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call to action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 439–451. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00474.x
  • Pendry, L. F., & Driscoll, D. M. (2011). Five guiding principles to help to improve diversity- training assessment. Training and Management Development Methods, 25, 2.01-2.19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513501111119219
  • Pendry, L. F., Driscoll, D. M., & Field, S. C. T. (2007). Diversity training: Putting theory into practice. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 27–50. doi:10.1348/096317906X118397
  • Pusch, M. D. (2004). Intercultural training in historical perspective. In D. Landis, J. Bennett, & M. J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook of intercultural training (3rd ed.). (pp. 13–36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781452231129
  • Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation. A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Saks, Alan M., & Burke, L. A. (2012). An investigation into the relationship between training evaluation and the transfer of training. International Journal of Training and Development, 16, 118–127. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2419.2011.00397.x
  • Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The science of training and development in organizations: What matters in practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 74–101. doi:10.1177/1529100612436661
  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Society for Human Resource Management. (2005). 2005 workplace diversity practices survey report. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.
  • Stephan, W. G. (2006). Bridging the researcher-practitioner divide in intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 597–605. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2006.00475.x
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2013). Designing intercultural education and training programs: An evidence-based approach. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37, 277–286. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.05.001
  • Taylor, P. J., Lamers, A., Vincent, M. P., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (1998). The validity of immediate and delayed self-reports in training evaluation: An exploratory field study. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 47, 459–479. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1998.tb00038.x
  • Twitchell, S., Holton, E. F., III, & Trott, J. W. (2000). Technical training evaluation practices in the United States. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 13, 84–109. doi:10.1111/j.1937-8327.2000.tb00177.x
  • Wilson, T. D. (2011). Redirect. The surprising new science of psychological change. London: Penguin Books.
  • Wondrak, M. (2015). Diversity Management (DiM) & Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in ATX-Unternehmen – 2015 [Diversity management (DiM) & corporate social responsibility (CSR) in ATX-companies – 2015]. Retrieved from http://factor-d.at/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/DiM_CSR-Studie_2015.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.