Using technology integration frameworks in vocational education and training

References

• Allsopp, M. M., Hohlfeld, T., & Kemker, K. (2007). The Technology Integration Matrix: The development and field-test of an Internet based multi-media assessment tool for the implementation of instructional technology in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Florida Educational Research Association, Tampa, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Bluic, A.-M., Casey, G., Bachfisher, A., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2012). Blended learning in vocational education: Teachers’ conceptions of blended learning and their approaches to teaching and design. Australian Education Researcher, 39(2), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-012-0053-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M. (2017). Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 22(2017), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2006). The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. Pfeiffer.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M., Withers, E., Down, C., Figgis, J., & McManus, J. (2011). Pedagogical practices across the tertiary sector: Summarising the literature on the pedagogical support for students moving from VET into universities. Australian Vocational Education and Training Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Burden, K., & Kearney, M. (2018). Designing an educator toolkit for the mobile learning age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 10(2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJMBL.2018040108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappell, C. (2003). Changing pedagogy: Issues for contemporary pedagogy. In OVAL research working paper, 03-14 (pp. 15). OVAL Research, University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, B., Wang, M., Mørch, A. I., Chen, N.-S., Kinshuk, & Spector, J. M. (2014). Research on e-learning in the workplace 2000–2012: A bibliometric analysis of the literature. Educational Research Review, 11(2014), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, B., & Harris, R. (2018). Recent reforms in vocational education and training. International Journal of Training Research, 16(2), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2018.1501913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian, K., & MacLean, D. (2014). Keep taking the tablets? Assessing the use of tablet devices in learning and teaching activities in the further education sector. Research in Learning Technology, 22. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v22.22648
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P. (2003). Changing pedagogy: Productive learning. In Oval research working paper 03-16. OVAL Research, University of Technology Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, E. R., Rosenburg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0091-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmes, C. J., Welsh, J. L., & Winkelman, R. J. (2016). A framework for defining and evaluating technology integration in the instruction of real-world skills. In Y. Rosen, S. Ferrara, & M. Mosharraf (Eds.), Handbook of research on technology tools for real-world skill development (pp. 137–162). IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, M. S. H., Bibi, S., & Hasan, M. (2016). Australian technical teachers’ experience of technology integration in teaching. SAGE Open, 6(3), 215824401666360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016). Emerging technology integration models. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications(pp. 51–64). Athabasca University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, B., Spencer, E., & Claxton, G. (2012). How to teach vocational education: A theory of vocational pedagogy. City & Guilds Centre for Skill Development – University of Winchester.
   Google Scholar
• Marcovitz, D. M., & Janiszewski, N. (2015). Technology, models, and 21st-century learning: how models, standards, and theories make learning powerful. Paper presented at the SITE 2015 Conference, Las Vegas, NV, United States.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, S. (2018). Technology integration, leadership, and organizational support frameworks for instructional improvement with information technology. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.-W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 535–542). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamad, M. M., Heong, Y. M., Kiong, T. T., & Rajuddin, M. R. (2012). Vocational pedagogy a dimension of vocational learning with workplace requirement. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 4(1), 23–30, Retrieved from https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/ojs/index.php/JTET/article/view/482.
   Google Scholar
• Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given & T. Oaks (Eds.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods,(pp. 698–698. SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education in the state of Maine [Web log post]. Retrieved October 28, 2019, from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2006_11.html
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. (2009). Developments in pedagogic nomenclature in Australian vocational education: Evolution or revolution? International Journal of Training Research, 7(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijtr.7.2.106
   Google Scholar
• Schuck, S., Kearney, M., & Burden, K. (2017). Exploring mobile learning in the Third Space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1230555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh, J., Harmes, J. C., & Winkelman, R. (2011). Florida’s technology integration matrix. Principal Leadership, 12(2), 69–71. Retrieved from https://www.setda.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/PLOct11_techtips.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wingo, N. P., Ivankova, N. V., & Moss, J. A. (2017). Faculty perceptions about teaching online: Exploring the literature using the technology acceptance model as an organizing framework. Online Learning, 21(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.10.24059/olj.v21i1.761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar