My dog, my beach! Attitudes towards dog management on Victorian beaches

References

• Bryman, A. 2004. Social Research Methods. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burger, J., N. Tsipoura, A. Simnor, T. Pittfield, C. Jeitner, D. Mizrahi, and L. Ferguson. 2017. “Perceptions of Caucasian Users About Avian Resources and Beach Restoration Following Hurricane Sandy.” Urban Ecosystems 20 (2): 363–373. doi:10.1007/s11252-016-0598-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrd, E. S., N. J. Olynk Widmar, E. A. Yeager, and J. G. Lee. 2017. “Identifying Wildlife Species Believed to be Deserving of Protection From Hunting by US Residents.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 22 (4): 1–8. doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1318323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Greater Geelong. 2017. Dogs in Public Spaces. Geelong: COGG. Accessed October 31, 2016. http://www.geelongaustralia.com.au/pets/article/item/8cb7a7e73c87487.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. E., K. Cupp, C. L. Phelps, M. N. Peterson, K. T. Stevenson, and C. Serenari. 2017. “Household Dynamics of Wildlife Value Orientations.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 22 (5): 1–9. doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1345022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, G. F., and E. L. Johnston. 2017. Australia State of the Environment 2016: Coasts, Independent Report to the Australian Government Minister for Environment and Energy. Canberra: Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Consorte-McCrea, A., D. Nigbur, and A. Bath. 2017. “The Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus): Implications of Teenagers’ Attitudes Towards its Conservation in Brazil.” Canid Biology and Conservation 20 (5): 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Context. 2013. Consultation on the Dog Walking Review – Mornington Peninsula National Park. Brunswick: Context Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., S. J. Riley, and W. F. Siemer. 2012. Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, B., and M. A. Weston. 1999. “Managing a Breeding Population of the Hooded Plover Thinornis rubricollis in a High-use Recreational Environment.” Bird Conservation International 9: 255–270. doi:10.1017/S0959270900003440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamborg, C., and F. S. Jensen. 2016. “Wildlife Value Orientations: A Quantitative Study of the General Public in Denmark.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21 (1): 34–46. doi:10.1080/10871209.2015.1098753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurran, N., B. Norman, and E. Hamin. 2016. “Population Growth and Change in Non-metropolitan Coastal Australia.” In Parallel Patterns of Shrinking Cities and Urban Growth: Spatial Planning for Sustainable Development of City Regions and Rural Areas, edited by R. Ganso, and R. Piro, 165–184. London: Routledge: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, J. A., W. T. Borrie, and D. N. Cole. 2000. “Factors That Limit Compliance with Low-impact Recommendations” Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station Bulletin 4: 198–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkinson, S., J. Hale, and P. Harrop. 2009. “Influencing Walkers with Dogs: Three Years of Progress.” Countryside Recreation 17: 18–22.
   Google Scholar
• Krelling, A. P., A. T. Williams, and A. Turra. 2017. “Differences in Perception and Reaction of Tourist Groups to Beach Marine Debris That Can Influence a Loss of Tourism Revenue in Coastal Areas.” Marine Policy 85: 87–99. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.08.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, K. D., D. Goodman, and C. P. Sandoval. 2006. “Restoration of Breeding by Snowy Plovers Following Protection From Disturbance.” Biodiversity and Conservation 15: 2217–2230. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-7180-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucrezi, S., and M. F. van der Walt. 2016. “Beachgoers’ Perceptions of Sandy Beach Conditions: Demographic and Attitudinal Influences, and the Implications for Beach Ecosystem Management.” Journal of Coastal Conservation 20 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1007/s11852-015-0419-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, G. S., K. K. Miller, and M. A. Weston. 2018. “Only the Strictest Rules Apply: Investigating Regulation Compliance of Beaches to Minimize Invasive Dog Impacts on Threatened Shorebird Populations.” In Coasts in Crisis: Impacts of Invasive Species on Coastal Environments, edited by C. W. Finkl, and C. Makowski, 397–412. Dordrecht: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, G. S., K. K. Miller, M. A. Weston, and K. Young. 2011. “Being Beside the Seaside: Beach Use and Preferences among Coastal Residents of South-Eastern Australia.” Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 781–788. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2011.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, G. S., J. M. Rimmer, and M. A. Weston. 2013. “Stakeholder Perceptions of Threatened Species and Their Management on Urban Beaches.” Animals 3: 1002–1020. doi:10.3390/ani3041002.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D. 2011. Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. 3rd ed. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. K., and D. N. Jones. 2006. “Gender Differences in the Perceptions of Wildlife Management Objectives and Priorities in Australasia.” Wildlife Research 33: 155–159. doi:10.1071/WR05036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, K. K., and T. K. McGee. 2000. “Sex Differences in Values and Knowledge of Wildlife in Victoria, Australia.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5 (2): 54–68. doi:10.1080/10871200009359179.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. K., E. G. Ritchie, and M. A. Weston. 2014. “Human Dimensions of Dog-Wildlife Interactions.” In Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation, edited by M. E. Gompper, 286–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mornington Peninsula Shire. 2016. Where to Exercise Your Dog. Frankston: MPS. Accessed October 31, 2016. http://www.mornpen.vic.gov.au/Your-Property/Animals-Pets/Pet-Owner-Info/Leash-free-areas.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, C. O., J. Draper, and A. W. Dixon. 2010. “Comparing Resident and Tourist Preferences for Public Beach Access and Related Amenities.” Ocean & Coastal Management 53 (5): 245–251. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petch, N., G. S. Maguire, T. A. Schlacher, and M. A. Weston. 2018. “Motivations and Behavior of Off-road Drivers on Sandy Beaches.” Ocean & Coastal Management 163: 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puczkó, L., and T. Rátz. 2000. “Tourist and Resident Perceptions of the Physical Impacts of Tourism at Lake Balaton, Hungary: Issues for Sustainable Tourism Management.” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 8 (6): 458–478. doi:10.1080/09669580008667380.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, T., P. R. Barrios, G. McKee, M. McLaws, and T. Kosatsky. 2018. “Public Health Considerations Associated with the Location and Operation of Off-leash Dog Parks.” Journal of Community Health, doi:10.1007/s10900-017-0428-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlacher, T. A., D. Richardson, and I. McLean. 2008. “Impacts of Off-road Vehicles (ORVs) on Macrobenthic Assemblages on Sandy Beaches.” Environmental Management 41: 878–892. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9071-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlacher, T. A., and L. M. C. Thompson. 2008. “Physical Impacts Caused by Off-road Vehicles (ORVs) to Sandy Beaches: Spatial Quantification of Car Tracks on an Australian Barrier Island.” Journal of Coastal Research 224: 234–242. doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9426-9 doi: 10.2112/06-0691.1
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. J., G. S. Maguire, D. A. Whisson, and M. A. Weston. 2019. “Regulations Fail to Constrain dog Space use in Threatened Species Beach Habitats.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, doi:10.1080/09640568.2019.1628012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuttlewood, C. Z., P. J. Greenwell, and V. T. Montrose. 2016. “Pet Ownership, Attitude Toward Pets, and Support for Wildlife Management Strategies.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 21 (2): 180–188. doi:10.1080/10871209.2016.1116029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterl, P., C. Brandenburg, and A. Arnberger. 2008. “Visitors’ Awareness and Assessment of Recreational Disturbance of Wildlife in the Donau-Auen National Park.” Journal for Nature Conservation 16: 135–145. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surf Coast Shire. 2016. Dogs on Leash Controls. Anglesea: SCC. Accessed October 31, 2016. http://www.surfcoast.vic.gov.au/My_Community/Pets_Animals/Dogs_On_Leash_Controls.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, S., K. K. Miller, and J. McBurnie. 2016. “Community Perceptions of Orangutan Conservation and Palm Oil in Melbourne, Australia.” International Journal of Environmental Studies 73 (2): 255–267. doi:10.1080/00207233.2016.1144332.
   Google Scholar
• Typhina, E., and C. Yan. 2014. “Managing Dog Waste: Campaign Insights From the Health Belief Model.” Applied Environmental Education & Communication 13: 73–82. doi:10.1080/1533015X.2014.944247.
   Google Scholar
• Usher, L. E., and E. Gómez. 2016. “Surf Localism in Costa Rica: Exploring Territoriality among Costa Rican and Foreign Resident Surfers.” Journal of Sport & Tourism 20 (3-4): 195–216. doi:10.1080/14775085.2016.1164068.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, D. L. 2006. “Factors Influencing Owners’ Reactions to Their Dogs’ Fouling.” Environment and Behavior 38: 707–714. doi:10.1177/0013916505284794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, M. A., G. C. Ehmke, and G. S. Maguire. 2011. “Nest Return Times in Response to Static Versus Mobile Human Disturbance.” Journal of Wildlife Management 75: 252–255. doi:10.1002/jwmg.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, M. A., J. A. Fitzsimons, G. Wescott, K. K. Miller, K. B. Ekanayake, and T. Schneider. 2014. “Bark in the Park: A Review of Domestic Dogs in Parks.” Environmental Management 54 (3): 373–382. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0311-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, M. A., E. M. McLeod, D. T. Blumstein, and P. J. Guay. 2012. “A Review of Flight-Initiation Distances and Their Application to Managing Disturbance to Australian Birds.” Emu 112: 269–286. doi:10.1071/MU12026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weston, M., and T. Stankowich. 2014. “Dogs as Agents of Disturbance.” In Free-ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation, edited by M. Gompper, 94–116. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiernik, B., D. Ones, and S. Dilchert. 2013. “Age and Environmental Sustainability: A Meta-analysis.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 28 (7-8): 826–856. doi:10.1108/JMP-07-2013-0221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbowska, A. I., M. Hedzrak, B. Popczyk, H. Okarma, and K. Crooks. 2016. “Predation of Wildlife by Free Ranging Domestic Dogs in Polish Hunting Grounds and Potential Competition with the Grey Wolf.” Biological Conservation 201: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. J. H., M. A. Weston, S. Henry, and G. S. Maguire. 2009. “Birds and Beaches, Dogs and Leashes: Dog Owners’ Sense of Obligation to Leash Dogs on Beaches in Victoria, Australia.” Human Dimensions of Wildlife 14: 89–101. doi:10.1080/10871200802649799.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M. E., H. M. Solo-Gabriele, S. Elmir, and L. E. Fleming. 2009. “Microbial Load From Animal Feces at a Recreational Beach.” Marine Pollution Bulletin 58: 1649–1656. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar