Ecosystem service management and spatial prioritisation in a multifunctional landscape in the Bay of Plenty, New Zealand

References

• Abell, J. M., D. P. Hamilton, and J. Paterson. 2011. “Reducing the External Environmental Costs of Pastoral Farming in New Zealand: Experiences from the Te Arawa Lakes, Rotorua.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 18: 139–154. doi: 10.1080/14486563.2011.591520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R., et al. 2013. “New Zealand’s Indigenous Forests and Shrublands.” In Ecosystem Services in New Zealand-Conditions and Trends, edited by J. Dymond, 34–48. Lincoln: Manaaki Whenua Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslaksen, I., S. Nybø, E. Framstad, P. A. Garnåsjordet, and O. Skarpaas. 2015. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: the Nature Index for Norway.” Ecosystem Services 12: 108–116. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ausseil, A. G. E., et al. 2013. “Assessment of Multiple Ecosystem Services in New Zealand at the Catchment Scale.” Environmental Modelling and Software 43: 37–48. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, E. M., G. D. Peterson, and L. J. Gordon. 2009. “Understanding Relationships among Multiple Ecosystem Services.” Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrman, K. D., T. E. Juenger, J. R. Kiniry, and T. H. Keitt. 2015. “Spatial Land use Trade-Offs for Maintenance of Biodiversity, Biofuel, and Agriculture.” Landscape Ecology 30: 1991–2003. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0225-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., R. de Groot, L. Braat, I. Kubiszewski, L. Fioramonti, P. Sutton, S. Farber, and M. Grasso. 2017. “Twenty Years of Ecosystem Services: How Far Have We Come and How Far Do We Still Need to go?” Ecosystem Services 28: 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. M. A., T. Satterfield, and J. Goldstein. 2012. “Rethinking Ecosystem Services to Better Address and Navigate Cultural Values.” Ecological Economics 74: 8–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsar, U., et al. 2013. “Principal Component Analysis on Spatial Data: an Overview.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 103: 106–128. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2012.689236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., et al. 2005. “Biodiversity Regulation of Ecosystem Services.” In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, edited by R. Hassan, R. Scholes, and N. Ash. Washington, Covelo, London: Island Press. pp. 299–329.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H., and P. A. L. D. Nunes. 2014. “Modeling the Links Between Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services and Human Wellbeing in the Context of Climate Change: Results from an Econometric Analysis of the European Forest Ecosystems.” Ecological Economics 97: 60–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond, J. R., et al. 2013. “Nitrate and Phosphorus Leaching in New Zealand: a National Perspective.” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 49–59. doi: 10.1080/00288233.2012.747185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond, J. R., A. G. E. Ausseil, and J. M. Overton. 2008. “A Landscape Approach for Estimating the Conservation Value of Sites and Site-Based Projects, with Examples from New Zealand.” Ecological Economics 66: 275–281. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymond, J. R., A. E. Ausseil, D. A. Peltzer, and A. Herzig. 2015. “Conditions and Trends of Ecosystem Services in New Zealand — a Synopsis.” Solutions 6: 38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Dymond, J. R., H. D. Betts, and C. S. Schierlitz. 2010. “An Erosion Model for Evaluating Regional Land-use Scenarios.” Environmental Modelling and Software 25: 289–298. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahey, B., et al. 2010. “Using the WATYIELD Water Balance Model to Predict Catchment Water Yields and low Flows.” Journal of Hydrology (NZ 49: 35–58.
   Google Scholar
• Ford-Robertson, J., K. Robertson, and P. MacLaren. 1999. “Modelling the Effect of Land-use Practices on Greenhouse gas Emissions and Sinks in New Zealand.” Environmental Science and Policy 2: 135–144. doi: 10.1016/S1462-9011(99)00009-X
   Google Scholar
• Grêt-Regamey, A., S. E. Rabe, R. Crespo, S. Lautenbach, A. Ryffel, and B. Schlup. 2014. “On the Importance of non-Linear Relationships Between Landscape Patterns and the Sustainable Provision of Ecosystem Services.” Landscape Ecology 29: 201–212. doi: 10.1007/s10980-013-9957-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, R. S., et al. 2010. “Challenges in Integrating the Concept of Ecosystem Services and Values in Landscape Planning, Management and Decision Making.” Ecological Complexity 7: 260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., et al. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. London: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, P. A., P. M. Berry, G. Simpson, J. R. Haslett, M. Blicharska, M. Bucur, R. Dunford, et al. 2014. “Linkages Between Biodiversity Attributes and Ecosystem Services: a Systematic Review.” Ecosystem Services 9: 191–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfenstein, J., and F. Kienast. 2014. “Ecosystem Service State and Trends at the Regional to National Level: a Rapid Assessment.” Ecological Indicators 36: 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.06.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzig, A., A.-G. E. Ausseil, and J. R. Dymond. 2014. ‘Spatial Optimisation of Ecosystem Services’, in, Ecosystem Services in New Zealand - Conditions and Trends. Lincoln: Manaaki Whenua Press. pp. 511–523.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., et al. 2014. “Creating win-Wins from Trade-Offs? Ecosystem Services for Human Well-Being: a Meta-Analysis of Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs and Synergies in the Real World.” Global Environmental Change 28: 263–275. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S., S. Ahmed, and B. Burkhard. 2015. “‘Landscape’s Capacities to Supply Ecosystem Services in Bangladesh: a Mapping Assessment for Lawachara National Park’.” Ecosystem Services 12: 128–135. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izquierdo, A. E., and M. L. Clark. 2012. “Spatial Analysis of Conservation Priorities Based on Ecosystem Services in the Atlantic Forest Region of Misiones, Argentina.” Forests 3: 764–786. doi: 10.3390/f3030764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolliffe, I. T. 2002. Principal Component Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschbaum, M. U. F. 1999. “CenW, a Forest Growth Model with Linked Carbon, Energy, Nutrient and Water Cycles.” Ecological Modelling 118: 17–59. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00020-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landcare Research NZ Ltd. 2000. Fundamental soil layer – New Zealand soil classification. Landcare Research NZ Ltd. Viewed 1 November 2017. https://lris.scinfo.org.nz/layer/48079-fsl-new-zealand-soil-classification/
   Google Scholar
• Landcare Research NZ Ltd. 2012. Land Cover Database version 4.1, mainland New Zealand. Viewed 15 June 2017. https://lris.scinfo.org.nz
   Google Scholar
• Lavorel, S., and K. Grigulis. 2012. “How Fundamental Plant Functional Trait Relationships Scale-up to Trade-Offs and Synergies in Ecosystem Services.” Journal of Ecology 100: 128–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutner, B. and Horning, N. 2017. RStoolbox: Tools for remote sensing data analysis. https://cran.r-project.org/package=RStoolbox
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., L. Zhang, J. Yan, P. Wang, N. Hu, W. Cheng, and B. Fu. 2017. “Mapping the Hostpots and Coldspots of Ecosystem Services in Conservation Priority Setting.” Journal of Geographical Sciences 377: 681–696. doi: 10.1007/s11442-017-1400-x
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., C. Chen, W. Lien, W. Chang, J. R. Petway, and L. Chiang. 2019. “Landscape Conservation Planning to Sustain Ecosystem Services Under Climate Change.” Sustainability 11: 1393. doi: 10.3390/su11051393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locatelli, B., P. Imach, and S. Wunder. 2013. “Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Ecosystem Services in Costa Rica.” Environmental Conservation 41: 27–36. doi: 10.1017/S0376892913000234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclaren, J. 1996. “‘Plantation Forestry: its Role as a Carbon Sink’.” In Greenhouse: Coping with Climate Change, edited by W. Bouma, G. Pearman, and M. Manning. Collingwood: CSIRO Publishing. pp. 257–270.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, J., et al. 2012. “Synergies and Trade-Offs Between Ecosystem Service Supply, Biodiversity, and Habitat Conservation Status in Europe.” Biological Conservation 155: 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez, M. L., O. Pérez-Maqueo, G. Vázquez, G. Castillo-Campos, J. García-Franco, K. Mehltreter, M. Equihua, and R. Landgrave. 2009. “Effects of Land use Change on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Tropical Montane Cloud Forests of Mexico.” Forest Ecology and Management 258: 1856–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maseyk, F. J. F., E. J. Dominati, and A. D. Mackay. 2018. “Change in Ecosystem Service Provision Within a Lowland Dairy Landscape Under Different Riparian Margin Scenarios.” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 14: 17–31. doi: 10.1080/21513732.2017.1411974
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, AgResearch. 2011. OVERSEER®. http://www.overseer.org.nz/
   Google Scholar
• Moller, H., C. J. MacLeod, J. Haggerty, C. Rosin, G. Blackwell, C. Perley, S. Meadows, F. Weller, and M. Gradwohl. 2008. “Intensification of New Zealand Agriculture: Implications for Biodiversity.” New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 51: 253–263. doi: 10.1080/00288230809510453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, F. J., and A. J. Daigneault. 2015. “Estimating Impacts of Climate Change Policy on Land use: an Agent-Based Modelling Approach.” PLoS ONE 10: 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, A. S., K. P. Lertzman, and L. Gustafsson. 2017. “Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Forest Ecosystems: a Research Agenda for Applied Forest Ecology.” Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 12–27. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouchet, M. A., et al. 2014. “An Interdisciplinary Methodological Guide for Quantifying Associations Between Ecosystem Services.” Global Environmental Change 28: 298–308. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newsome, P., R. Wilde, and E. Willoughby. 2008. Land Resource Information System Spatial Data Layers. Palmerston North, NZ: Landcare Research NZ Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholson, E., et al. 2009. “Priority Research Areas for Ecosystem Services in a Changing World.” Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 1139–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell, P. J., and P. M. L. Anderson. 2010. “Sustainable Multifunctional Landscapes: a Review to Implementation.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power, A. G. 2010. “Ecosystem Services and Agriculture: Tradeoffs and Synergies.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 365: 2959–2971. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, J., and M. G. Turner. 2013. “Spatial Interactions among Ecosystem Services in an Urbanizing Agricultural Watershed.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110: 12149–12154. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310539110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz, C., et al. 2015. “Mapping Bundles of Ecosystem Services Reveals Distinct Types of Multifunctionality Within a Swedish Landscape.” Ambio 44: 89–101. doi: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.r-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G. D. Peterson, and E. M. Bennett. 2010. “Ecosystem Service Bundles for Analyzing Tradeoffs in Diverse Landscapes.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 5242–5247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. 2017. ‘Psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research’. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University. Version 1.8.4, https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ring, I., et al. 2010. “Challenges in Framing the Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: the TEEB Initiative.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roche, M. 2008. Exotic forestry. Te Ara – the Encyclopedia of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, J. P., et al. 2006. “Trade-offs Across Space, Time, and Ecosystem Services.” Ecology and Society 11: 28. doi: 10.5751/ES-01667-110128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhu, H. S., S. D. Wratten, and R. Cullen. 2010. “Organic Agriculture and Ecosystem Services.” Environmental Science and Policy 13: 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2009.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, T., et al. 2016. “Environmental Impact Assessment and Monetary Ecosystem Service Valuation of an Ecosystem Under Different Future Environmental Change and Management Scenarios; a Case Study of a Scots Pine Forest.” Journal of Environmental Management 173: 79–94. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter, M., and R. P. Remme. 2016. “Spatial Prioritisation for Conserving Ecosystem Services: Comparing Hotspots with Heuristic Optimisation.” Landscape Ecolgoy 31: 431–450. doi: 10.1007/s10980-015-0258-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulp, C. J. E., S. Lautenbach, and P. H. Verbrug. 2016. “Quantifying and Mapping Ecosystem Services: Demand and Supply of Polliation in the European Union.” Ecological Indicators 36: 131–141. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, R., et al. 2016. “Searching for Resilience: Addressing the Impacts of Changing Disturbance Regimes on Forest Ecosystem Services.” Journal of Applied Ecology 53: 120–129. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small, N., M. Munday, and I. Durance. 2017. “The Challenge of Valuing Ecosystem Services That Have no Material Benefits.” Global Environmental Change 44: 57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics New Zealand. 2017. Agricultural Production Survey 2017 Tables. Viewed 1 November 2017 https://www.stats.govt.nz/topics/agriculture
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B., and L. Fidell. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor, and S. Polasky. 2002. “'Agricultural Sustainability and Intensive Production Practices’.” Nature 418: 671–677. doi: 10.1038/nature01014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler, W. 1988. “‘Resolution, Resampling, and all That.” In Building Data Bases for Global Science, edited by H. Mounsey, and R. Tomlinson. London: Taylor and Francis. pp. 129–137.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, G., et al. 2015. “Using Ecosystem Service Bundles to Detect Trade-Offs and Synergies Across Urban-Rural Complexes.” Landscape and Urban Planning 136: 110–121. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar