Regulatory pluralism: positing priority actions in waste and recycling management

References

• Ajayi, S., and L. Oyedele. 2017. “Policy Imperatives for Diverting Construction Waste from Landfill: Experts’ Recommendations for UK Policy Expansion.” Journal of Cleaner Production 147: 57–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., and J. Braithwaite. 1992. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin, R., M. Cave, and M. Lodge. 2012. Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartley, T. 2007. “Institutional Emergence in an era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 297–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2001. “Decentring Regulation: Understanding the Role of Regulation and Self-Regulation in a “Post-Regulatory” World.” Current Legal Problems 54: 103–146.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J. 2008. “Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes.” Regulation and Governance 2 (2): 137–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabham, D. 2013. Using Crowdsourcing in Government, IBM Center for the Business of Government, IBM, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P. 2009. “Toxic Waste in our Midst: Towards an Interdisciplinary Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1559–1566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., and N. Gregson. 2009. “Crossing the Threshold: Municipal Waste Policy and Household Waste Generation.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (4): 929–945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., M. Watson, and R. Hudson. 2007. “Modes of Governing Municipal Waste.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (11): 2733–2753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, T. 2020. ‘National cabinet launches ambitious federation reform agenda’. Australian Financial Review, 29 May 2020. https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/national-cabinet-launches-ambitious-federation-reform-agenda-20200529-p54xrb.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2009. National Waste Policy: Less Waste, More Resources by 2020. Canberra: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2018a. National Waste Policy: Less Waste, More Resources by 2020. Canberra: ACT.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2018b. Waste and Recycling in Australia – Inquiry. Senate Standing Committee on Environment and Communications. (June 2018). https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/WasteandRecycling.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. 2020. COAG becomes National Cabinet (02 June 2020). https://www.pmc.gov.au/news-centre/government/coag-becomes-national-cabinet.
   Google Scholar
• Corley, K., and D. Gioia. 2004. “Identity Ambiguity and Change in the Wake of a Corporate Spin-off.” Administrative Science Quarterly 49 (2): 173–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culley, M., and J. Hughey. 2008. “Power and Public Participation in a Hazardous Waste Dispute: A Community Case Study.” American Journal of Community Psychology 41 (1–2): 99–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, C. L. 2018. “Proposal of a Dynamic Model to Evaluate Public Policies for the Circular Economy: Scenarios Applied to the Municipality of Curitiba.” Waste Management 78: 456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström, K., C. Howes, P. Leinster, and J. Skea. 2003. “Environmental Management Systems and Company Performance: Assessing the Case for Extending Risk-Based Regulation.” European Environment 13: 187–203.
   Google Scholar
• Delmas, M., and O. Young. 2009. Governance for the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N., and Y. Lincoln. 2011. The Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drahos, P., ed. 2017. Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications. Canberra, AU: ANU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, P., C. Dieperink, F. van Laerhoven, H. Runhaar, and W. Vermeulen. 2012. “Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Shifts in Modes of Environmental Governance: Experiences from the Netherlands.” Environmental Policy and Governance 22 (3): 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florin, N., E. Dominish, and D. Giurco. 2015. Action Agenda for resource productivity and innovation: opportunities for Australia in the circular economy. University of Technology Sydney, AU, May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Geissdoerfer, M., P. Savaget, N. Bocken, and E. Hultink. 2017. “The Circular Economy - A new Sustainability Paradigm?” Journal of Cleaner Production 143: 757–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldson, A., A. Morton, and S. Pollard. 2009. “Better Environmental Regulation — Contributions from Risk-Based Decision-Making.” Science of the Total Environment 407: 5283–5288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Victoria. 2015. Environment Protection (Scheduled Premises and Exemptions), (Industrial Waste Resource) and (Fees) Amendment Regulations 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Grabosky, P. 1997. “Inside the Pyramid: Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of Regulatory Systems.” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 25 (3): 195–201.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2009a. “Environment law, Regulation and Governance: Shifting Architectures.” Journal of Environmental Law 21 (2): 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. 2009b. “The new Collaborative Environmental Governance: The Localization of Regulation.” Journal of Law and Society 36 (1): 145–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., P. Grabosky, and D. Sinclair. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., R. Kagan, and D. Thornton. 2003. Shades of Green: Business, Regulation and Environment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., and D. Sinclair. 1999a. “Integrative Regulation: A Principle-Based Approach to Environmental Policy.” Law & Social Inquiry 24 (4): 853–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., and D. Sinclair. 1999b. “Regulatory Pluralism: Designing Policy Mixes for Environmental Protection.” Law & Policy 21 (1): 49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., and D. Sinclair. 2002. Leaders & Laggards: Next-Generation Environmental Regulation. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, C. 2015. “Crafting Collaborative Governance: Water Resources, California’s Delta Plan, and Audited Self-Management in New Zealand.” Environmental Law Reporter 45 (4): 10324–10337.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, C., and N. Gunningham. 2011. “Natural Resources, new Governance and Legal Regulation: When Does Collaboration Work?” New Zealand Universities Law Review 24: 309–336.
   Google Scholar
• Holley, C., N. Gunningham, and C. Shearing. 2012. The New Environmental Governance. Abingdon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. 2010. Anticipating Risks and Organizing Risk Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, N., and H. Corvellec. 2018. “Waste Policies Gone Soft: An Analysis of European and Swedish Waste Prevention Plans.” Waste Management 77: 322–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kautto, P., and M. Melanen. 2004. “How Does Industry Respond to Waste Policy Instruments—Finnish Experiences.” Journal of Cleaner Production 12: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions.” Resources, Conservation & Recycling 127: 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korhonen, J., A. Honkasalo, and J. Seppala. 2018. “Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations.” Ecological Economics 143: 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, C. 2007. “Examining State Environmental Regulatory Policy Design.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50 (4): 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBouchardiere, R., S. Goater, and R. Beeton. 2014. “Integrating Stakeholder Perceptions of Environmental Risk Into Conventional Management Frameworks: Coal Seam gas Development in Queensland.” Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 21 (4): 359–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., Y. Yao, J. Zuo, and J. Li. 2020. “Key Policies to the Development of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry in China.” Waste Management 108: 137–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S.-R., and J. Schoenung. 2010. “Toxicity Potentials from Waste Cellular Phones, and a Waste Management Policy Integrating Consumer, Corporate, and Government Responsibilities.” Waste Management 30: 1653–1660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodhia, S., and N. Martin. 2012. “Stakeholder Responses to the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act: An Agenda Setting Perspective.” Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 25 (1): 126–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margallo, M., K. Ziegler-Rodriguez, I. Vázquez-Rowe, R. Aldacoa, A. Irabien, and R. Kahhat. 2019. “Enhancing Waste Management Strategies in Latin America Under a Holistic Environmental Assessment Perspective: A Review for Policy Support.” Science for the Total Environment 689: 1255–1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menell, P. 2019. Environmental Law, E-Copy Edition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., A. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Morlet, A., J. Blerlot, S. Hubold, R. Opsomer, M. Linder, and I. Banks. 2015. Delivering the Circular Economy – A Toolkit for Policymakers. Ellen Macarthur Foundation, June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. 2017. “Evolving Polycentric Governance of the Great Barrier Reef.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114 (15): E3013–E3021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, W. 2013. “The Effectiveness of Recycling Policy Options: Waste Diversion or Just Diversions?” Waste Management 33: 508–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Waste and Recycling Association (USA). 2017. Issue Brief: China’s Changing Policies on Imported Recyclables. September 2017. Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Niza, S., E. Santos, I. Costa, P. Ribeiro, and P. Ferrão. 2014. “Extended Producer Responsibility Policy in Portugal: a Strategy Towards Improving Waste Management Performance.” Journal of Cleaner Production 64: 277–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Measuring Regulatory Performance, Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy, Expert Paper No. 1, (8 August 2012) OECD Publishing, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. “Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems.” American Economic Review 100: 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Percival, R., and H. Zhao. 2014. “The Role of Civil Society in Environmental Governance in the United States and China.” Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 24 (1): 142–182.
   Google Scholar
• Pickin, J. 2013. Analysis of Landfill Survey Data - Australia. Melbourne, VIC: Blue Environment Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pickin, J., P. Randell, J. Trinh, & B. Grant, (2018) Australian National Waste Report 2018. Department of the Environment and Energy & Blue Environment Pty Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Queensland Government. 2019. Waste levy Fact Sheet, viewed 1 June 2019, https://www.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0028/99307/queensland-waste-levy-fact-sheet.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Rae, I., and P. Brown. 2009. “Managing the Intractable: Communicative Structures for Management of Hexachlorobenzene and Other Scheduled Wastes’.” Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1583–1592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn, O. 2008. Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, K., ed. 2015. The Law and Policy of Environmental Federalism: A Comparative Analysis. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, H., P. Irving, T. Walden, and R. Yearsley. 2006. “The Risks of Risk-Based Regulation: Insights from the Environmental Policy Domain.” Environment International 32: 1056–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrente-Velásquez, J., R. Chifari, M. Ripa, and M. Giampietro. 2020. “Robust Information for Effective Municipal Solid Waste Policies: Identifying Behaviour of Waste Generation Across Spatial Levels of Organization.” Waste Management 103: 208–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triguero, A., C. Alvarez-Aledo, and M. Cuerva. 2016. “Factors Influencing Willingness to Accept Different Waste Management Policies: Empirical Evidence from the European Union.” Journal of Cleaner Production 138: 38–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, C., G. Qiping Shen, and S. Choi. 2018. “Differential Public Support for Waste Management Policy: The Case of Hong Kong.” Journal of Cleaner Production 175: 477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waste.net Incorporated. 2020. Multi-Year Price Summary, viewed 20 June 2020, https://www.waste.net/cgi-bin/price7.cgi?do=purchase.
   Google Scholar
• Wilts, H., N. von Gries, and B. Bahn-Walkowiak. 2016. “From Waste Management to Resource Efficiency—The Need for Policy Mixes.” Sustainability 8 (622): 1–16.
   Google Scholar