Condition assessment model for sewer pipelines using fuzzy-based evidential reasoning

References

• Al-Barqawi, H., and T. Zayed. 2006. “Assessment Model of Water Main Conditions.” Proc., Pipeline Division Specialty Conference. Chicago, IL: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Ana, E., W. Bauwens, M. Pessemier, C. Thoeye, S. Smolders, I. Boonen, and G. De Gueldre. 2009. “An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Sewer Structural Deterioration.” Urban Water Journal 6 (4): 303–312.10.1080/15730620902810902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbari, M. J., M. Tabesh, and A. Roozbahani. 2017. “Risk Assessment Model to Prioritize Sewer Pipes Inspection in Wastewater Collection Networks.” Journal of Environmental Management 190: 91–101.10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariaratnam, S. T., A. El-Assaly, and Y. Yang. 2001. “Assessment of Infrastructure Inspection Needs Using Logistic Models.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 7 (4): 160–165.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:4(160)
   Google Scholar
• Baah, K., B. Dubey, R. Harvey, and E. McBean. 2015. “A Risk-based Approach to Sanitary Sewer Pipe Asset Management.” Science of the Total Environment 505: 1011–1017.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bae, H., R. V. Grandhi, and R. A. Canfield. 2004. “Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification Techniques including Evidence Theory for Large-Scale Structures.” Advances in Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability 82 (13–14): 1101–1112.
   Google Scholar
• Baik, H. S., H. S. Jeong, and D. M. Abraham. 2006. “Estimating Transition Probabilities in Markov Chain-based Deterioration Models for Management of Wastewater Systems.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 132 (1): 15–24.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(15)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai, H., R. Sadiq, H. Najjaran, and B. Rajani. 2008. “Condition Assessment of Buried Pipes Using Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning Model.” Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 22 (2): 114–122.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2008)22:2(114)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur, R., and R. Herz. 2002. “Selective Inspection Planning with Ageing Forecast for Sewer Types.” Water Science and Technology 46 (6–7): 389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolar, A., S. Tesfamariam, and R. Sadiq. 2013. “Condition Assessment for Bridges: A Hierarchical Evidential Reasoning (HER) Framework.” Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 9 (7): 648–666.10.1080/15732479.2011.602979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSI (British Standards Institution). 2012. Investigation and Assessment of Drain and Sewer Systems outside Buildings-General Requirements. London: BSI. ISBN: 978-0-580-70190-0.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, Y. C., and J. R. Wright. 1996. “Evidential Reasoning for Assessing Environmental Impact.” Civil Engineering Systems 14 (1): 55–78.10.1080/02630259608970210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2007a. “Sewer Pipeline Operational Condition Prediction Using Multiple Regression.” Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects. Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2007b. “Structural Condition Models for Sewer Pipeline.” Proc., Pipelines 2007: Advances and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects. Reston, VA: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Chughtai, F., and T. Zayed. 2008. “Infrastructure Condition Prediction Models for Sustainable Sewer Pipelines.” Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 22 (5): 333–341.10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2008)22:5(333)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, J. P., B. A. Clarke, J. T. Whiter, R. J. Cunningham, and A. Leidi. 2001. “The Structural Condition of Rigid Sewer Pipes: A Statistical Investigation.” Urban Water 3: 277–286.10.1016/S1462-0758(01)00036-X
   Google Scholar
• Fares, H., and T. Zayed. 2010. “Hierarchical Fuzzy Expert System for Risk of Failure of Water Mains.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 1 (1): 53–62.10.1061/(ASCE)PS.1949-1204.0000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner, R. A. 2000. “Approaches to Sewer Maintenance: A Review.” Urban Water 2: 343–356.10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00065-0
   Google Scholar
• Fenner, R. A., L. Sweeting, and M. J. Marriott. 2000. “A New Approach for Directing Proactive Sewer Maintenance.” Proceedings of the ICE-Water and Maritime Engineering 142 (2): 67–77.
   Google Scholar
• German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste (DWA). 2015. State Detection and Assessment of Drain and Sewer Systems outside Buildings-Part 3: Assessment by Optical Inspection. Hennef: DWA. ISBN: 978-3-88721-224-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, M. A., R. N. Palmer, M. S. Merrill, and B. Lukas. 2002. “Expert System for Prioritizing the Inspection of Sewers: Knowledge Base Formulation and Evaluation.” Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 128 (2): 121–129.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2002)128:2(121)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, K., Y. Wada, and H. Miura. 1999. “New Assessment Systemfor Premeditated Management and Maintenance of Sewer Pipenetworks.” Proc., 8th Int. Conf. on Urban Storm Drainage, 586–593. Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, Y., R. Sadiq, and B. B. Rajani. (2004a). “Modeling the Deterioration of Buried Infrastructure as a Fuzzy Markov Process.” Submitted to Journal of Infrastructure Systems, ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Kleiner, Y., R. Sadiq, and B. B. Rajani. (2004b), “Modeling Failure Risk in Buried Pipes Using Fuzzy Markov Deterioration Process.” ASCE International Conference on Pipeline Engineering and Construction, San Diego, CA, August.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H. 1996. “Applying Fuzzy Set Theory to Evaluate the Rate of Aggregative Risk in Software Development.” Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79: 323–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodian, M., and A. M. Alani. 2013. “Multi-failure Mode Assessment of Buried Concrete Pipes Subjected to Time-dependent Deterioration, Using System Reliability Analysis.” Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention 13 (5): 634–642.10.1007/s11668-013-9727-9
   Google Scholar
• Mahmoodian, M., and A. Alani. 2013. “Modeling Deterioration in Concrete Pipes as a Stochastic Gamma Process for Time-dependent Reliability Analysis.” Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice 5 (1): 04013008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoodian, M., and A. Alani. 2016. “Sensitivity Analysis for Failure Assessment of Concrete Pipes Subjected to Sulphide Corrosion.” Urban Water Journal 13 (6): 637–643.10.1080/1573062X.2015.1012085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouk, M., and A. Osama. 2017. “Fuzzy-based Methodology for Integrated Infrastructure Asset Management.” International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 10 (1): 745–759.10.2991/ijcis.2017.10.1.50
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcdonald, S. E., and J. Q. Zhao. 2001. “Condition Assessment and Rehabilitation of Large Sewers.” Proceedings of International Conference on Underground Infrastructure Research, 361–369. Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Micevski, T., G. Kuczera, and P. Coombes. 2002. “Markov Model for Storm Water Pipe Deterioration.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 8 (2): 49–56.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:2(49)
   Google Scholar
• Müller, K. 2002. “Development of a Generally Applicable Methodology for Selective Inspection of Sewer Networks. Part a: Scientific Studies.” Final Report of the Institute of Urban Water Management ISA. Aachen: RWTH Aachen University.
   Google Scholar
• Najafi, M., and G. Kulandaivel. 2005. “Pipeline Condition Prediction Using Neural Network Models.” Proc., Pipeline 2005, 767–781. Reston, VA: ASCE.10.1061/9780784408001
   Google Scholar
• Oberkampf, W. L., and C. J. Roy. 2010. Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511760396
   Google Scholar
• Ruwanpura, J., S. T. Ariaratnam, and A. El-Assaly. 2003. “A Rule-based Simulation Models for Sewer Infrastructure.” Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress. Honolulu, HI: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. J. 1996. Decision Making in Complex Environments. the Analytical Hierarchy Process for Decision Making with Dependence and Dependence and Feedback. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, R., B. Rajani, and Y. Kleiner. 2004. “Fuzzy-based Method to Evaluate Soil Corrosivity for Prediction of Water Main Deterioration.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 10: 149–156.10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(149)
   Google Scholar
• Sentz, K., and F. Scott. 2002. “Combination of evidence in Dempster-Shafer theory.” Vol. 4015. Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories.
   Google Scholar
• Sadiq, R., H. Najjaran, and Y. Kleiner. 2006. “Investigating Evidential Reasoning for the Interpretation of Microbial Water Quality in a Distribution Network.” Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 21 (1): 63–73.10.1007/s00477-006-0044-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, H. D. 2007. “Investigation of Deterioration Models for Stormwater Pipe Systems.” PhD thesis, Victoria University, Melburne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Tran, H. D., B. J. C. Perera, and A. W. M. Ng. 2009. “Markov and Neural Network Models for Prediction of Structural Deterioration of Storm-water Pipe Assets.” Journal of Infrastructure Systems 16 (2): 167–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesfamariam, S., R. Sadiq, and H. Najjaran. 2010. “Decision Making under Uncertainty-an Example for Seismic Risk Management.” Risk Analysis 30 (1): 78–94.10.1111/risk.2010.30.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslu, B., S. K. Sinha, W. L. Graf, and T. Angkasuwansiri. 2015. “Development of a Wastewater Pipeline Performance Prediction Model.” In Pipelines 2015, 776–789. Baltimore, MD: ASCE VA.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B. 2001. “Rule and Utility Based Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multi-Attribute Decision Analysis under Uncertainties.” European Journal of Operational Research 131: 31–61.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00441-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., and P. Sen. 1994. “A General Multi-Level Evaluation Process for Hybrid MADM with Uncertainty.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24 (10): 1458–1473.10.1109/21.310529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., and M. G. Singh. 1994. “An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24 (1): 1–18.10.1109/21.259681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. B., and D. L. Xu. 2002. “On the Evidential Reasoning Algorithm for Multiple Attribute Decision Analysis under Uncertainty.” IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 32 (3): 289–304.10.1109/TSMCA.2002.802746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8: 338–353.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zayed, T., and D. Halpin. 2005. “Deterministic Models for Assessing Productivity and Cost of Bored Piles.” Journal of Construction Management and Economics 23 (5): 531–543.10.1080/01446190500039911
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Xiaoguang. 2012. “Fuzzy Analytical Network Process Implementation with Matlab, MATLAB – A Fundamental Tool for Scientific Computing and Engineering Applications.” Vol. 3, Prof. VasiliosKatsikis (Ed.), London: InTech. ISBN: 978-953-51-0752-1.
   Google Scholar