U.S. state higher education appropriations: assessing the relationships between agency politicization, centralization, and volatility

References

• Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 618–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bails, D., & Tieslau, M. A. (2000). The impact of fiscal constitutions on state and local expenditures. The Cato Journal, 20, 255–277.
   Google Scholar
• Barrilleaux, C., & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policy making. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 409–417.10.1177/106591290305600403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E., & Long, B. T. (2004). Do college instructors matter? The effects of adjuncts and graduate assistants on students’ interests and success ( Working Paper No. 10370). NBER. http://www.nber.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E., & Long, B. T. (2006). The increasing use of adjunct instructors at public institutions: Are we hurting students? In R. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What’s happening to public higher education (pp. 51–69). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press for the American Council on Education.
   Google Scholar
• Beyle, T. L. (1968). The governor’s formal powers: A view from the governor’s chair. Public Administration Review, 540–545.
   Google Scholar
• Beyle, T. (1996). Governors: The middlemen and women in our political system. In V. Gray & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Politics in the American States: A comparative analysis (6th ed., pp. 207–252). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyle, T. L. & Muchmore, L. R. (1983). Being governor: The view from the office. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2004). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 13, 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Breneman, D. W. (2002). For colleges, this is not just another recession. The chronicle of higher education, 48, B7–B9.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A. (2009). Diversifying municipal government revenue structures: Fiscal illusion or instability? Public Budgeting & Finance, 29, 27–48.10.1111/pbaf.2009.29.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A., & Stater, K. J. (2009). Revenue diversification in nonprofit organizations: Does it lead to financial stability? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 947–966.10.1093/jopart/mun025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheslock, J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 208.10.1353/jhe.2008.0012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonfund Institute. (2010). 2009 NACUBO-commonfund study of endowments. Wilton, CT: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell, C., Mustard, D. B., & Sridhar, D. J. (2006). The enrollment effects of merit-based financial aid. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 761–786.10.1086/506485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dar, L., & Spence, M. J. (2011). Partisanship, political polarization, and state budget outcomes: The case of higher education. SSRN eLibrary. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1577365
   Google Scholar
• Dearden, J. A., & Husted, T. A. (1993). Do governors get what they want?: An alternative examination of the line-item veto. Public Choice, 77, 707–723.10.1007/BF01047990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2007). The role of higher education in state budgets. In K. M. Shaw & D. E. Heller (Eds.), State postsecondary education research: New methods to inform policy and practice (pp. 55–76). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing LLC.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 343–368.
   Google Scholar
• Dometrius, N. C. (1979). Measuring gubernatorial power. The Journal of Politics, 41, 589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, W. R., McLendon, M. K., & Hearn, J. C. (2010). Why states adopted prepaid tuition and college savings programs: An event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 51, 659–686.10.1007/s11162-010-9173-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg, R. G., & Zhang, L. (2005). Do tenured and tenure-track faculty matter? Journal of Human Resources, XL, 647–659.10.3368/jhr.XL.3.647
   Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, L. A. (1959). Autonomy of public colleges: The challenge of coordination. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Glenny, L. A. (1970). Institutional autonomy for whom? In G. K. Smith (Ed.), The troubled campus: Current issues in higher education (pp. 153–163). Washington, DC: AAHE.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, H. M., & Kahn, C. H. (1952). The stability of state and local tax yields. The American Economic Review, 42, 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, J. C., & Griswold, C. P. (1994). State-level centralization and policy innovation in U.S. postsecondary education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 161–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. M., & Garand, J. C. (1991). Expenditure tradeoffs in the US states: A pooled analysis. Journal of Public Administration and Theory, 1, 295–318.
   Google Scholar
• Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar US business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovey, H. A. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support. San Jose, CA: California State Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T. J., Orszag, P. R., & Gunter, D. L. (2003). State fiscal constraints and higher education spending: The role of Medicaid and the business cycle. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Krupnikov, Y., & Shipan, C. (2012). Measuring gubernatorial budgetary power: A new approach. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 12, 438–455.10.1177/1532440012453591
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, A. (2011). Measuring state postsecondary governance: Developing a new continuum of centralization ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Lasher, W., & Sullivan, C. (2004). Follow the money: The changing world of budgeting in higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 19, pp. 197–240). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., & Zhang, L. (2007). What determines employment of part-time faculty in higher education institutions? ( WP105). Cornell Higher Education Research Institute (CHERI). Unnecessary, part of Cornell Digital Commons: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1120&context=workingpapers
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism, organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78, 734–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K. (2003). State governance reform of higher education: Patterns, trends, and theories of the public policy process. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 18, pp. 57–143). London: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0137-3
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Deaton, S. B., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education: Testing the political instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 645–675.10.1353/jhe.2007.0041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 686–713.10.1353/jhe.0.0075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. P. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76, 363–400.10.1353/jhe.2005.0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLendon, M., Mokher, C., & Flores, S. (2011). Legislative agenda setting for in-state resident tuition policies: Immigration, representation, and educational access. American Journal of Education, 117, 563–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, M. J. (2008). State debt policies and the credit ratings of public universities. Public Finance Review, 36, 287–307.10.1177/1091142107311460
   Google Scholar
• Ness, E. C. (2010). The politics of determining merit aid eligibility criteria: An analysis of the policy process. The Journal of Higher Education, 81, 33–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, J., & Meier, K. J. (2003). Politics, structure, and public policy: The case of higher education. Educational Policy, 17, 80–97.10.1177/0895904802239287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, R. G. (1976). Environmental and political determinants of state higher education appropriations policies. The Journal of Higher Education, 47, 523–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primo, D. M., Jacobsmeier, M. L., & Milyo, J. (2007). Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 446–459.10.1177/153244000700700405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn, M. O., & Uhlig, H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 371–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzo, M. J. (2006). State preference for higher education spending: A panel data analysis, 1977-2001. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), What's happening to public higher education? The Shifting Financial Burden (pp. 3–36). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. A. (1989). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The squire index revisited. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 131–147.10.1177/0951692889001002002
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Squire, P. (1992). Legislative professionalism and membership diversity in state legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17, 69–79.10.2307/440081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, P. (2000). Uncontested seats in state legislative elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 131–146.10.2307/440396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, P. (2007). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The squire index revisited. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 211–227.10.1177/153244000700700208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, P., & Hamm, K. E. (2005). 101 chambers: Congress, state legislatures, and the future of legislative studies. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO). (2009). State budgeting for higher education in the United States. Boulder, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO). (2012). State higher education finance report. Boulder, CO: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2008). The politics of state higher education funding. Higher Education in Review, 5, 1–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2010a). Interest groups and governmental institutions the politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24, 735–778.10.1177/0895904809339163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2010b). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51, 416–450.10.1007/s11162-010-9164-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Ness, E. C. (2011). State Capital Expenditures for Higher Education: “Where the real politics happens”. Journal of Education Finance, 36, 394–423.
   Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A. (2013). The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures. The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 506–543.10.1353/jhe.2013.0026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandberg, D. A., & Griffith, C. (2013). State support of higher education: Data, measures, findings, and directions for future research. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and Research (pp. 613–685). Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Toutkoushian, R. K., & Hollis, P. (1998). Using panel data to examine legislative demand for higher education. Education Economics, 6, 141–157.10.1080/09645299800000012
   Google Scholar
• Trow, M. A. (1993). The analysis of status. In B. Clark (Ed.), Perspectives on higher ed- ucation: Eight disciplinary and comparative views (pp. 132–164). Berkeley: Univer- sity of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckman, H. P., & Chang, C. F. (1991). A methodology for measuring the financial vulnerability of charitable nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 20, 445–460.10.1177/089976409102000407
   Google Scholar
• White, F. C. (1983). Trade-off in growth and stability in state taxes. National Tax Journal, 36, 103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2006). Examining differences in state support for higher education: A comparative study of state appropriations for research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77, 935–967.10.1353/jhe.2006.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winston, G. C. (1999). Subsidies, hierarchy and peers: The awkward economics of higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13, 13–36.10.1257/jep.13.1.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. S. (1967). Executive leadership in state administration. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 11, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W. (2011). The interactive effect of revenue diversification and economic base on US local government revenue stability. Public Money & Management, 31, 419–426.10.1080/09540962.2011.618766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar