What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program

References

• Carter, P. (2012). Policy as palimpset. Policy & Politics, 40, 423–443.10.1332/030557312X626613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E. (1993). Conceptual stressing revisited: Adapting categories to comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87, 845–855.10.2307/2938818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortrell, A. P., & Peterson, S. (2001). Limiting the unintended consequences of institutional change. Comparative Political Studies, 34, 768–799.10.1177/0010414001034007003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26, 5–17.10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity: New issues in governance theory. Governance, 21, 311–335.10.1111/gove.2008.21.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferlie, E., Fitzgerald, L., McGivern, G., Dopson, S., & Bennett, C. (2011). Public policy networks and ‘wicked problems’: A nascent solution. Public Administration, 89, 307–324.10.1111/padm.2011.89.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring, J. (1993). What Makes a concept good: A criterial framework for understanding concept formation in the social sciences. Polity, 31, 357–393.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, M. T. (2006). Incrementalism and public policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Hogwood, B. W., & Peters, B. G. (1984). Policy dynamics. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Margetts, H. (2007). Tools of government in a digital age. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-06154-6
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2010). The governance of problems: Puzzling, powering and participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2000). Managing the ‘Hollow State’: Procedural policy instruments and modern governance. Canadian Public Administration, 43, 412–431.10.1111/capa.2000.43.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47, 187–207.10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2011). Governing in the long term: Democracy and the politics of investment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511921766
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.-H., & Snellen, I. (2009). Complexity theory and public administration: A critical appraisal. In G. Teisman, A. van Buuren, & L. Gerrits (Eds.), Managing complex governance systems (pp. 87–104). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. J. (2009). Super-wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the present to liberate the future. Cornell Law Review, 94, 1153–1233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, K. B., Cashore, S. Bernstein, & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45, 121–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1989). Instruments of government: Perceptions and contexts. Journal of Public Policy, 9, 35–58.10.1017/S0143814X00007960
   Google Scholar
• Maycraft Kall, W. (2013). The governance gap: Central-local steering & mental health reform in Britain and Sweden(PhD. dissertation). Department of Political Science, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, A. (2010). Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-08228-2
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. D. (2000). Polycentric games and institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.10728
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. R. (1977). The moon and the ghetto. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Ney, S. (2009). Resolving messy policy problems: Handling conflict in environment, transport, health and aging policy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Payan, T. (2006). Cops, soldiers and diplomats: Explaining agency behavior in the war on drugs. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2014). Food policy as a wicked problem. World Food Policy Journal, 1, 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2015). An advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Hoornbeek, J. (2005). The problem of policy problems. In P. Eliadis, M. Hill, & M. Howlett (Eds.), Designing government (pp. 77–105). Montreal: McGill/Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Tarpey, M. M. (2016). Are there really any wicked problems out there? Pittsburgh, PA: Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., Galaz, V., Pierre, J. (in press). Simple answers for complex problems? In V. Galaz (Ed.), Handbook of complexity and governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in the general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (2013). Making the most of mess: Reliability and policy in today’s management challenges. Durham: NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822395690
   Google Scholar
• Room, G. (2011). Complexity, institutions and public policy: Agile decision-making in a turbulent world. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.10.4337/9780857932648
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14, 271–327.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 167—183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misinformation and comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64, 1033–1053.10.2307/1958356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1988). The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Administration, 66, 239–278.10.1111/padm.1988.66.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Solving intractable policy disputes. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sieber, S. (1980). Fatal remedies: Dilemmas of social intervention. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1973). Applying information technology to organizational design. Public Administration Review, 33, 268–278.10.2307/974804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Peters, B. G., Pierre, J., & Sørensen, E. (2011). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68, 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar