Designing for sustainable outcomes: espousing behavioural change into co-production programmes

References

• Alford, J. (2002). Why do public-sector clients coproduce? Toward a contingency theory. Administration & Society, 34(1), 32–56.10.1177/0095399702034001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BBS. (2015). GDP of Bangladesh 2014–2015 (p) (Base: 2005–06), Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2007). (Ed.). Public governance. (Vol. 4). London: Sage.10.4135/9781446263082
   Google Scholar
• BPS Indonesia (2014). Statistik Indonesia 2014 Badan Pusat Statistik - Statistics Indonesia. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23, 1119–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., Stoker, G., Jones, T., Loeffler, E., & Roncancio, M. P. (2015). Activating collective co-production of public services: Influencing citizens to participate in complex governance mechanisms in the UK. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 47–68. doi: 10.1177/0020852314566009
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2015). Distinguishing different types of coproduction: A conceptual analysis based on the classical definitions. Public Administration Review, 76, 427–435.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8, 493–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney, J. L., & England, R. E. (1983). Toward a definition of the coproduction concept. Public Administration Review, 59–65.10.2307/975300
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., Shah, M., & Olivia, S., (2013) Impact evaluation of a large-scale rural sanitation project in Indonesia ( World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 6360). The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, D., Gupta, A., Hathi, P., Khurana, N., Spears, D. Srivastav, N., & Vyas, S. (2014). Revealed preference for open defecation: Evidence from a new survey in rural north India ( SQUAT Working Paper No. 1.). Research Institute for Compassionate Economics (RICE)
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management, 14, 532–550.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Bangladesh (GoB). (2005). Ministry of local government, rural development and cooperatives. Dhaka: National Sanitation Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Bangladesh (GoB). (2016). Bangladesh country paper. Sixth South Asian Conference on Sanitation (SACOSAN-VI), Local government Division, Ministry of Local government, Rural Development and Cooperatives, Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., & Sinclair, D. (1999). Regulatory pluralism: Designing policy mixes for environmental protection. Law and Policy, 21(1), 49–76.10.1111/lapo.1999.21.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanchett, S., Khan, M. H., Krieger, L., & Kullmann, C. (2011). Sustainability of sanitation in rural Bangladesh. In The future of water sanitation and hygiene: Innovation, adaptation and engagement in a changing world. Loughborough, UK: 35th WEDC International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2007). Re-visiting the new orthodoxy of policy dynamics: The dependent variable and re-aggregation problems in the study of policy change. Canadian Political Science Review, 1(2), 50–62.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11(1), 33–46.10.1080/13876980802648144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. P.. (2013, April 1). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and Rebirth?) Oof policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381. doi:10.1177/0095399712459725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182.10.17645/pag.v1i2.95
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I., & Rayner, J. (2014). The elements of effective program design: A two-level analysis. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, G., Haller, L., & Bartram, J. (2007). Global cost-benefit analysis of water supply and sanitation interventions. Journal of Water and Health, 5, 481–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar, K., & Chambers, R. (2008). Handbook on community-led total sanitation. London: Plan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. H. (2012). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leone, R., Walker, C., Curry, L., & Agee, E. (2012). Application of a marketing concept to patient-centered care: Co-producing health with heart failure patients. Online journal of issues in nursing, 17(2), 7–14.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, L., Johnson, H. L., Cousens, S., Perin, J., Scott, S., Lawn, J. E., … Mathers, C. (2012). Child health epidemiology reference group of WHO and UNICEF global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: An updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2151–2161.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löffler, E., Parrado, S., Bovaird, T., & Van Ryzin, G. (2008). If you want to go fast, walk alone. If you want to go far, walk together. Citizens and the co-production of public services. Report to the EU Presidency. Paris: Ministry of Finance, Budget and Public Services.
   Google Scholar
• Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359–380.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. (2014, December). Guidelines For SWACHH BHARAT MISSION (Gramin)
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation, Government of India. (2016, January). Country Paper – India. Sixth Asian Conference on Sanitation (SACOSAN VI), Dhaka.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Health. (2013). RI, Buku Saku Verikasi Sanitasi Total Bernbasis Masyarakat [Community-based total sanitation verification booklet]. Jakarta: Directorate of Environmental Health, Ministry of Health, Republic of Indonesia.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives (LGRD&C), Local Government Division, People’s republic of Bangladesh. (2005). National Sanitation Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Cooperatives (LGRD&C), Local Government Division, People’s republic of Bangladesh. (2016, January). Bangladesh country paper. Sixth South Asian Conference on Sanitation (SACOSAN).
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Drinking Water Supply, Government of India. (2004). Guidelines on Central Rural Sanitation Programme, Total Sanitation Campaign.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Rural Development, Department of Drinking Water Supply, Government of India. (2011, March). Assessment study of Iimpact and sustainability of Nirmal Gram Puraskar.
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, N. & with Robiarto, A., Effentrif, S. and Wartono, D. (2012). Achieving and sustaining open defecation free communities: Learning from East Java. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program (WSP).
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Indonesia (2009). Total sanitation and sanitation marketing research report. Washington, DC: Water and Sanitation Program, World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., … Wilson, R. (1981). Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations. Policy Studies Journal, 9(7), 1001–1011.10.1111/psj.1981.9.issue-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrado, S., Van Ryzin, G. G., Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2013). Correlates of co-production: Evidence from a five-nation survey of citizens. International Public Management Journal, 16(1), 85–112.10.1080/10967494.2013.796260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2006). Citizens and co-production of welfare services: Childcare in eight European countries. Public Management Review, 8(4), 503–519.10.1080/14719030601022882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2009). Towards a paradigm of democratic participation: Citizen participation and co-production of personal social services in Sweden. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 80(2), 197–224.10.1111/apce.2009.80.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2013). New public governance, the third sector, and co-production . (Vol. 7). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Planning Commission. (2013). Evaluation study on total sanitation campaign. Programme Evaluation Organisation, Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis-NPM, governance and the neo-Weberian State (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658.10.1080/14719037.2010.532963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K. & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78, 79–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prüss-Üstün, A., Bos, R., Gore, F., & Bartram, J. (2008). Safer water, better health: Costs, benefits and sustainability of interventions to protect and promote health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Quattri, M., Smets, S., & Nguyen, M. (2014). Investing in the next generation: Children grow taller and smarter, in rural, mountainous villages of Vietnam where community members use improved sanitation, WSP Research Brief. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1994). The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly, 65(2), 138–151.10.1111/poqu.1994.65.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sancino, A. (2015). The meta co-production of community outcomes: Towards a citizens’ capabilities approach. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sicilia, M., Guarini, E., Sancino, A., Andreani, M., & Ruffini, R. (2016). Public services management and co-production in multi-level governance settings. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82, 8–27. doi: 10.1177/0020852314566008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigler, R., Mahmoudi, L., & Graham, J. P. (2014). Analysis of behavioral change techniques in community-led total sanitation programs. Health promotion international, 30(1), 16–28.
   Google Scholar
• Snel, M., Carrasco, M., & Dube, A. (2014, November). The role of community-led total sanitation (CLTS) in providing sustainable sanitation. IRC Report. Delft, Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Spears, D. (2013). How much international variation in child height can sanitation explain? ( Policy Research Working Paper; No. WSP 6351). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, T., Nabatchi, T., & Brand, D. (2016). Introduction: Special issue on the coproduction of public services. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 3–7. doi:10.1177/0020852315618187
   Google Scholar
• UN-IGME. (2015). Levels & trends in child mortality, UN inter-agency group for child mortality estimation. New York, NY: WHO, Unicef and World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit, 24, 1083–1101.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, ( ahead-of-print), 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Water and Sanitation Program. (2010). The economic impact of inadequate sanitation in India. Economics of sanitation initiative. New Delhi, India: WSP, The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Who, U. (2015). Progress on drinking water and sanitation–2015 update. World Health Organization, Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, UNICEF. (2014). Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2014 Update and SDG assessment. New York, NY: UNICEF and World Heath Organization.
   Google Scholar
• WHO, UNICEF. (2015). Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2014 Update and SDG assessment. New York, NY: UNICEF and World Heath Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar