Reframing knowledge: A comparison of OECD and World Bank discourse on public governance reform

References

• Allan, B. B. (2019). Paradigm and nexus: neoclassical economics and the growth imperative in the world bank, 1948–2000. Review of International Political Economy, 26(1), 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asuncion Lera, S. C. (2006). Global poverty: The co-production of knowledge and politics. Global Social Policy: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Public Policy and Social Development, 6(1), 57–77.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2009). Standardizing global norms and informalizing authority: The IMF and World Bank’s new policy strategies. In ECPR Joint Sessions, Lisbon 14-19 April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2012). Bureaucratic ambiguity. Economy and Society, 41(1), 84–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. (2014). Governing failure: Provisional expertise and the transformation of global development finance. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bøås, M. & McNeill, D. (2003). Multilateral institutions. A critical introduction. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual issues in framing theory: A systematic examination of a decade‘s literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, R. (2006). Research, knowledge, and the art of ‘paradigm maintenance’: The World Bank’s development economics Vice-Presidency (DEC). Review of International Political Economy, 13(3), 387–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., Homolar, A., & Kranke, M. (2018). Bad science: International organizations and the indirect power of global benchmarking. European Journal of International Relations, 24(3), 514–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Seabrooke, L. (2012). Seeing like an international organisation. New Political Economy, 17(1), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunse, S., & Fritz, V. (2012). Making public sector reforms work: Political and economic contexts, incentives, and strategies. Washington DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Christiaens, J., & Rommel, J. (2008). Accrual accounting reforms: Only for businesslike (Parts of) governments. Financial Accountability & Management, 24(1), 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• De Francesco, F. (2013). Transnational policy innovation: The role of the OECD in the diffusion of regulatory impact analysis. Colchester: European Consortium for Political Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Francesco, F. (2016). Transfer agents, knowledge authority, and indices of regulatory quality: A comparative analysis of the World Bank and the organisation for economic co-operation and development. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 18(4), 350–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S. (2010). Good governance, institutions and economic development: Beyond the conventional wisdom. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 195–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djelic, M.-L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational governance: Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dostal, J. M. (2004). Campaigning on expertise: How the OECD framed EU welfare and labour market policies - and why success could trigger failure. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 440–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enns, C. (2014). Knowledges in competition: Knowledge discourse at the World Bank during the knowledge for development era. Global Social Policy, 15(1), 61–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkkilä, T., & Piironen, O. (2014). (De) politicizing good governance: The World Bank Institute, the OECD and the politics of governance indicators. Innovation: the European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 344–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., & Sebastian, O. (2009). The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 15(1), 125–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2013). Public sector reform as problem-solving? Comment on the World Bank’s public sector management approach for 2011 to 2020. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 398–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1990). When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M., & Haas, E. B. (2002). Pragmatic constructivism and the study of international institutions. Millennium, 31(3), 573–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardam, N. (1993). Development approaches and the role of policy advocacy: The case of the World Bank. World Development, 21(11), 1773–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. 2003. “Governance matters III: Governance indicators for 1996–2002.” World Bank Policy Resaerch Working Paper (3106).
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Bayerlein, L., Enkler, J., & Grohs, S. (2019). Bureacratic influence and administrative styles in international organizations. Review of International Organizations, 14(1), 83–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koon, A. D., Hawkins, B., & Mayhew, S. H. (2016). Framing and the health policy process: A scoping review. Health Policy and Planning, 31(6), 801–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramarz, T., & Momani, B. (2013). The World Bank as knowledge bank: Analyzing the limits of a legitimate global knowledge actor. Review of Policy Research, 30(4), 409–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2009). OECD peer reviews and policy convergence: Diffusing policies or discourses. In A. S. F. Biermann & B. Siebenhuner (Eds.), International organizations in global environmental governance (pp. 71–90). Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, A. (ed.). (2017). The politics of expertise in international organizations: How international bureaucracies produce and mobilize knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. (2005). The importance of being modern: International benchmarking and national regulatory innovation. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, R. (2019). Broadening the social investment Agenda: The OECD, the World Bank and inclusive growth. Global Social Policy.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahon, R., & Stephen, M. (2009). Standardizing and disseminating knowledge: The role of the OECD in global governance. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 83–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, N., & Willy, M. (2013). The World Bank’s approach to public sector management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 391–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1983). Organizing political life: What administrative reorganization tells us about government. The American Political Science Review, 77(2), 281–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M. (2004). Multilateral surveillance and the OECD: Playing the idea game. In K. Armingeon & M. Beyler (Eds.), The OECD and European welfare states (pp. 13–31). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Marcussen, M, & Trondal, J. (2011). The OECD civil servant: Caught between Scylla and Charybdis. Review of International Political Economy, 18(5), 592–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Jakobi, A. P. (eds). (2010). Mechanisms of OECD governance: International incentives for national policy making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. (2007). Democratization, international knowledge institutions, and global governance. Governance, 20(2), 325–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2007). The World Bank and global managerialism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson, D. L., Tierney, M. J., & Weaver, C. E. (2006). Bridging the rationalist–constructivist divide: Re-engineering the culture of the World Bank. Journal of International Relations and Development, 9(2), 107–139.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1995a). Recommendation of the Council of the OECD on improving the quality of government regulation. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (1995b). Governance in transition. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003a). Public sector modernisation: The way forward–policy brief. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2003b). Public sector modernizations–policy brief. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005a). Modernising government: The way forward. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005b). OECD guiding principles for regulatory quality and performance. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Regulatory policy and governance: Supporting economic growth and serving the public interest. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, L. A. (2008). Inversions without end: The OECD and global public management reform. Vancouver: UBC Press Vancouver.
   Google Scholar
• Pal, L. A. (2012). Frontiers of governance: The OECD and global public management reform. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. (2013). Back in the OECD … an oblique comment on the World Bank’s better results from public sector institutions. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 406–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T., & Webb, M. (2008). Role of the OECD in the orchestration of global knowledge networks. In R. Mahon & M. Stephen (Eds.), The OECD and transnational governance (pp. 43–59). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prévost, B., & Rivaud, A. (2018). The World Bank’s environmental strategies: Assessing the influence of a biased use of new institutional economics on legal issues. Ecosystem Services, 29, 370–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. 2018. Regulatory indicators in the European Union and the organization for economic cooperation and development: Performance assessment, organizational processes, and learning. Public Policy and Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin, K., & Wedlin, L. (2010). Circulating ideas: Imitation, translation and editing. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 218–242). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Arenas as standardizers. In B. Nils & J. Bengt (Eds.), A world of standards (pp. 100–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2001). National, international and transnational constructions of new public management. In T. Christensen & P. Lægreid (Eds.), New public management the transformation of ideas and practice (pp. 43–72). Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Santiso, C. (2001). Good governance and aid effectiveness: The World Bank and conditionality. Georgetown Public Policy Review, 7(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman, J. C. (2012). Seeing like the OECD on tax. New Political Economy, 17(1), 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shihata, I. (1990). Issues of ‘Governance’ in borrowing members: The extent of their relevance under the Bank’s Articles of Agreement. Washington: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, B. A., Dobbin, F., & Garrett, G. (2008). Introduction: The diffusion of liberalization. In B. A. Simmons, F. Dobbin, & G. Garrett (Eds.), The global diffusion of markets and democracy (pp. 1–63). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. tics of Targets and Indicators in SDG4.”
   Google Scholar
• Smullen, A. (2010). Translating agency reform through durable rhetorical styles: Comparing official agency talk across consensus and adversarial contexts. Public Administration, 88(4), 943–959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2003). The “Knowledge Bank” and the global development network. Governance, 9(1), 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘Transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Independent Evaluation Group, World Bank. (2008). Public sector reform: What works and why?: An IEG evaluation of World Bank support. Washington DC: World Bank. URL http://elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/book/10.1596/978-0-8213-7589-1
   Google Scholar
• Theodore, N., & Peck, J. (2012). Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating ‘commonsense’ urban policy across the OECD zone. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(1), 20–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, M. A. (2007). The governance bank. International Affairs, 83(4), 729–745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetterlein, A. (2007a). Economic growth, poverty reduction, and the role of social policies. The evolution of the World Bank’s social development approach. Global Governance, 13, 513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetterlein, A. (2007b). Change in international organizations: Innovation or adaptation? In D. Stone & C. Wright (Eds.), The World bank and governance (pp. 125–144). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vetterlein, A. (2012). Seeing like the World Bank on poverty. New Political Economy, 17(1), 35–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weaver, C. (2008). Hypocrisy Trap: The World Bank and the poverty of reform. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. (2008a). The World bank and social transformation in international politics: Liberalism, governance and sovereignty. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. A. (2008b). The OECD and foreign investment rules: The global promotion of liberalization. In R. Mahon & M. Stephen (Eds.), The OECD and transnational governance (pp. 117–133). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, R. (2004). The organisation for economic cooperation and development: Global monitor. New Political Economy, 9(1), 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1983). World development report 1983. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (1997). World development report 1997: The state in a changing World. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2003). Reforming public institutions and strengthening governance. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2012). Approach to public sector management 2011-2020: Better results from public sector institutions. Washington DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Xavier, J. A. (2013). The World bank approach to public sector management 2011–2020: Lessons from the Malaysian experience. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(3), 426–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar