3,132
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Into the ordinary: non-elite actors and the mobility of harm reduction policies

, &

References

  • Andresen, M. A., & Jozaghi, E. (2012). The point of diminishing returns: An examination of expanding Vancouver’s Insite. Urban Sudies, 49(16), 3531–3544.
  • Baker, T., & McCann, E. (2018). Beyond failure: The generative effects of unsuccessful proposals for supervised drug consumption sites (SCS) in Melbourne, Australia. Urban Geography, 1–19. doi:10.1080/02723638.2018.1500254
  • Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (forthcoming). He came back a changed man’: The popularity and influence of policy tourism. Area. doi:10.1111/area.12505
  • Baker, T., & Walker, C. (Eds.). (2019). Public policy circulation: Arenas, agents and actions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Batory, A, & Lindstrom, N. (2011). The power of the purse: Supranational entrepreneurship, financial incentives, and european higher education policy. Governance, 24(2), 311–329.
  • Berman, S. (2018). Ontario’s politicians greeted by 1,265 crosses on their lawn: The grave markers represented the number of overdose deaths across the province last year. Vice News, October 1. https://www.vice.com/en_ca/article/qvazwq/ontarios-politicians-greeted-by-1265-crosses-on-their-lawn
  • Bewley-Taylor, D. R. (2012). International drug control: Consensus fractured. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bunnell, T., Padawangi, R., & Thompson, E. (2018). The politics of learning from a small city: Solo as translocal model and political launch pad. Regional Studies, 52(8), 1065–1074.
  • Butler, M. (2017). Ithaca gets first look at supervised injection site model. May 2. https://www.ithaca.com/news/ithaca/ithaca-gets-first-look-at-supervised-injection-site-model/article_211dd07a-2f68-11e7-a11e-9f09d4c093c3.html
  • Cook, I., & Ward, K. (2012). Conferences, informational infrastructures and mobile policies: The process of getting Sweden ‘BID ready’. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(2), 137–152.
  • Cook, I., Ward, S., & Ward, K. (2014). A springtime journey to the Soviet Union: Postwar planning and policy mobilities through the Iron Curtain. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 805–822.
  • DeBeck, K., Wood, E., Montaner, J., & Kerr, T. (2006). Canada’s 2003 renewed drug strategy—An evidence-based review. HIV/AIDS Policy & Law Review, 11(2–3), 1–5.
  • Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, XLIV, 343–357.
  • Downing, M., Riess, T. H., Vernon, K., Mulia, N., Hollinquest, M., McKnight, C., … Edlin, B. R. (2005). What’s community got to do with it? Implementation models of syringe exchange programs. AIDS Education & Prevention, 17(1), 68–78.
  • Eagland, N. (2017). Vancouver overdose prevention site records 108,800 visits, 255 overdoses and 0 deaths. Vancouver Sun, December 14. https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/vancouver-overdose-prevention-site-records-108800-visits-255-overdoses-and-0-deaths.
  • Faulkner-Gurstein, R. (2017). The social logic of naloxone: Peer administration, harm reduction, and the transformation of social policy. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 20–27.
  • Gold, F. (2003). Advocacy and activism: Supervised injection facilities. Canadian Nurse, 99(2), 14–18.
  • Government of Canada. (2018a). Supervised consumption sites explained: Overdose prevention sites. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/supervised-consumption-sites/explained.htmla5.
  • Government of Canada. (2018b). Supervised consumption sites: Status of applications. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/substance-use/supervised-consumption-sites/status-application.html.
  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
  • Greer, A. M., Amlani, A., Pauly, B., Burmeister, C., & Buxton, J. A. (2018). Participant, peer and PEEP: Considerations and strategies for involving people who have used illicit substances as assistants and advisors in research. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 834.
  • Hoffman-Lange, U. (2007). Methods of elite research. In R. Dalton & H. Klingemann (Eds.), The oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 911–929). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jacobs, J., & Lees, L. (2013). Defensible space on the move: Revisiting the urban geography of Alice Coleman. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(5), 1559–1583.
  • Jenkins, K. (2008). Practically professionals? Grassroots women as local experts–A Peruvian case study. Political Geography, 27(2), 139–159.
  • Jolkkonen, R. (2019). Big philanthropies as agents of policy circulation in development: Examining the bill and melinda gates foundation. In T. Baker & C. Walker (Eds.), Public policy circulation: Arenas, agents, actions (pp. 73–88). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Knitnut.net. (2008). Ideology trumps evidence: Conservative drug policy. http://www.knitnut.net/2008/06/ideology-trumps-evidence-conservative-drug-policy/.
  • Larner, W., & Laurie, N. (2010). Travelling technocrats, embodied knowledges: Globalising privatisation in telecoms and water. Geoforum, 41(2), 218–226.
  • Laurie, N., Andolina, R., & Radcliffe, S. (2005). Ethnodevelopment: Social movements, creating experts and professionalising indigenous knowledge in Ecuador. Antipode, 37(3), 470–496.
  • Legrand, T. (2012). Overseas and over here: Policy transfer and evidence-based policy-making. Policy Studies, 33(4), 329–348.
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage.
  • Lupick, T. (2016a). Dodging drug laws, B.C. unveils plans to immediately offer supervised-injection services in Vancouver and other cities. Georgia Straight, December 8. https://www.straight.com/news/843146/dodging-drug-laws-bc-unveils-plans-immediately-offer-supervised-injection-services.
  • Lupick, T. (2016b). After a spike in deaths, B.C. opens 18 overdose-prevention sites in less than two weeks. Georgia Straight, December 20. https://www.straight.com/news/847056/after-spike-deaths-bc-opens-18-overdose-prevention-sites-less-two-weeks
  • Massey, D. (2011). A counterhegemonic relationality of place. In E. McCann & K. Ward (Eds.), Mobile urbanism: Cities and policymaking in the global age (pp. 1–14). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • McArthur, J. (2018). The production and politics of urban knowledge: Contesting transport in Auckland, New Zealand. Urban Policy and Research. doi:10.1080/08111146.2018.1476229
  • McCann, E. (2008). Expertise, truth, and urban policy mobilities: Global circuits of knowledge in the development of Vancouver, Canada’s ‘four pillar’ drug strategy. Environment and Planning A, 40(4), 885–904.
  • McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.
  • McCann, E., & Temenos, C. (2015). Mobilizing drug consumption rooms: Inter-place networks and harm reduction drug policy. Health & Place, 31, 216–223.
  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2013). A multi-disciplinary approach to policy transfer research: Geographies, assemblages, mobilities, and mutations. Policy Studies, 34(1), 2–18.
  • McLean, K. (2012). Needle exchange and the geography of survival in the South Bronx. International Journal of Drug Policy, 23(4), 295–302.
  • McNeil, R., Small, W., Lampkin, H., Shannon, K., & Kerr, T. (2014). “People knew they could come here to get help”: An ethnographic study of assisted injection practices at a peer-run ‘unsanctioned’ supervised drug consumption room in a Canadian setting. AIDS and Behavior, 18(3), 473–485.
  • Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Montero, S. (2017). Persuasive practitioners: Mobilizing the “Bogotá Model” through storytelling. Novos Estudos, 36(1), 59–75.
  • Mountz, A., & Curran, W. (2009). Policing in drag: Giuliani goes global with the illusion of control. Geoforum, 40(6), 1033–1040.
  • Nay, O. (2012). How do policy ideas spread among international administrations? Policy entrepreneurs and bureaucratic influence in the UN response to AIDS. Journal of Public Policy, 32(1), 53–76.
  • Northdurfter, U., & Hermans, K. (2018). Meeting (or not) at the street level? A literature review on street level research in public management, social policy and social work. International Journal of Social Welfare, 27(3), 294–304.
  • Osborn, B. (2008). A prayer for Insite. https://www.canadianharmreduction.com/sites/default/files/prayer%20for%20InSite%20by%20Bud%20Osborn.pdf.
  • Painter, J. (2005). State: Society. In P. Cloke & R. Johnston (Eds.), Spaces of geographical thought: Deconstructing human geography’s binaries (pp. 42–56). London: Sage.
  • Painter, J. (2006). Prosaic geographies of stateness. Political Geography, 25(7), 752–774.
  • Pal, L. (2012). Frontiers of governance: The OECD and global public management reform. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Parry, G. (2005). Political Elites. Colchester: ECPR Press.
  • Peck, J. (2006). Liberating the city: Between New York and New Orleans. Urban Geography, 27(8), 681–713.
  • Pow, C. P. (2018). Constructing authority: Embodied expertise, homegrown neoliberalism, and the globalization of Singapore’s private planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(6), 1209–1227.
  • Prince, R. (2012). Policy transfer, consultants and the geographies of governance. Progress in Human Geography, 36(2), 188–203.
  • Proudfoot, J., & McCann, E. J. (2008). At street level: Bureaucratic practice in the management of urban neighborhood change. Urban Geography, 29(4), 348–370.
  • Rapoport, E. (2015a). Sustainable urbanism in the age of Photoshop: Images, experiences and the role of learning through inhabiting the international travels of a planning model. Global Networks, 15(3), 307–324.
  • Rapoport, E. (2015b). Globalising sustainable urbanism: The role of international masterplanners. Area, 47(2), 110–115.
  • Routledge, P. (2003). Convergence space: Process geographies of grassroots globalization networks. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 28(3), 333–349.
  • Routledge, P., & Derickson, K. D. (2015). Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 391–407.
  • Schäfer, S. (2017). The role of organizational culture in policy mobilities—The case of South Korean climate change adaptation policies. Geographica Helvetica, 72, 341–350.
  • Smith, C. (2012). Harm reduction as anarchist practice: A user’s guide to capitalism and addiction in North America. Critical Public Health, 22(2), 209–221.
  • Smith, M. (2013). The global diffusion of public policy: Power structures and democratic Accountability. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1(2), 118–131.
  • Stone, D. (2001). Think tanks, global lesson-drawing and networking social policy ideas. Global Social Policy, 1(3), 338–360.
  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
  • Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499.
  • Temenos, C. (2016). Mobilizing drug policy activism: Conferences, convergence spaces and ephemeral fixtures in social movement mobilization. Space & Polity, 20(1), 124–141.
  • Temenos, C. (2017). Everyday proper politics: Rereading the post-political through mobilities of drug policy activism. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 42(4), 584–596.
  • Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2014). Policies. In The routledge handbook of mobilities (pp. 595–604). Routledge.
  • Theodore, N., & Peck, J. (2011). Framing neoliberal urbanism: Translating “commonsense” urban policy across the OECD zone. European Urban and Regional Studies, 19(1), 20–41.
  • Vogelpohl, A. (2017). Consulting completed: Temporal aspects of expertise in urban development during times of fast policies. Geographica Helvetica, 72, 65–76.
  • Webber, S. (2015). Mobile adaptation and sticky experiments: Circulating best practices and lessons learned in climate change adaptation. Geographical Research, 53(1), 26–38.
  • Wilson, H. (2017). On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography, 41(4), 451–471.
  • Woods, M. (1998). Rethinking elites: Networks, space, and local politics. Environment and Planning A, 30, 2101–2119.