When metaphors become cognitive locks: occupational pension reform in Norway

References

• Andersen, S. K., Dølvik, J. E., & Ibsen, C. L. (2014, September 22). Nordic labour market models in open markets ( ETUI-Report no. 132). Brussels: ETUI.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2007). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, D., & Cox, R. H. (2011). Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, S., & Kuhlmann, J. (2019). Stories of How to Give or Take - Towards a Typology of Social Policy Reform Narratives. Policy and Society, 38(3), 339–355.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. (2001). The transformation of the Swedish model: Economic ideas, distributional conflict, and institutional change. World Politics, 54(1), 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 103–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervik, R., & Lindén, T. S. (2015). The Shark Jaw and the elevator: Arguing the case for the necessity, harmlessness and fairness of the Norwegian pension reform. Scandinavian Political Studies, 38(4), 386–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen, G. (1996). After the golden age? Welfare state dilemmas in a global economy. In G. Esping-Andersen (Ed.), Welfare states in transition. National adaptations in global economies (pp. 1–31). London: UNRISD.
   Google Scholar
• Grødem, A. S., & Hippe, J. M. (2018). Networking, lobbying and bargaining for pensions: Trade union power in the Norwegian pension reform. Journal of Public Policy, 1–17. doi:10.1017/S0143814X18000144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2011). Ideas and the construction of interests. In D. Beland & R. H. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research (pp. 65–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, V. (2018). Cross-national convergence in times of crisis? Integration policies before, during and after the refugee crisis. West European Politics, 1–25. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1429748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, K. (2009). Elephants on the move. Patterns of public pension reform in OECD countries. European Review, 8(3), 353–378.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2009). How do ideas matter? Mental models and attention in German pension politics. Comparative Political Studies, 42(2), 252–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency and power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. (2004). Modernisert folketrygd. Bærekraftig pensjon for framtida. Norges offentlige utredninger, 2004: 1 . Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.
   Google Scholar
• Palier, B. (2000). ‘Defrosting’ the French welfare state. West European Politics, 23(2), 113–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A. W. (2017). ESPN thematic report: Assessment of pension adequacy in Norway, 2017. Brussels: European Commission & European Social Policy Network.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A. W. (2018). Norway: Agreement on occupational pension reform in the public sector. ESPN Flash Report 2018/45. Brussels: European Commission & European Social Policy Network.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, A. W., Hippe, J. M., Grødem, A. S., & Sørensen, O. B. (2018). Trade unions and the politics of occupational pensions in Denmark and Norway. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(1), 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1998). Irresistible forces, immovable objects: Post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(4), 539–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2002). The futures of european capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2014). Speaking to the markets or to the people? A discursive institutionalist analysis of the EU’s Sovereign debt crisis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(1), 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke, P. (2006). The politics of welfare state retrenchment: A literature review. Social Policy & Administration, 40(1), 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (2012). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J. (1999). New theories of discourse. Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• UNIO. (2011). Offentlig tjenestepensjon og AFP. Hva skjer med pensjonen min?. New edition 2011. Retrieved from https://www.unio.no/cms/files/2202
   Google Scholar
• van Oorschot, W. (2006). Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(1), 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar