4,013
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research Article

Employment insecurity and social policy: preferences for investment vis-à-vis consumption

& ORCID Icon

References

  • Alt, J., & Iversen, T. (2017). Inequality, labor market segmentation, and preferences for redistribution. American Journal of Political Science, 61(1), 21–36.
  • Anderson, C. J., & Pontusson, J. (2007). Workers, worries and welfare states: Social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), 211–235.
  • Ansell, B. W. (2010). From the ballot to the blackboard: The redistributive political economy of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2016). Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective. Politics & Society, 44(2), 175–207.
  • Beramendi, P., Hausermann, S., Kitschelt, H., & Kriesi, H. (2015). The politics of advanced capitalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Busemeyer, M. R. (2014). Skills and inequality: Partisan politics and the political economy of education reforms in western welfare states. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cavaille, C., & Trump, K.-S. (2014). The two facets of social policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 77(1), 146–160.
  • Cusack, T., Iversen, T., & Rehm, P. (2006). Risks at work: The demand and supply sides of government redistribution. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(3), 365–389.
  • Dancygier, R. M., & Walter, S. (2015). Globalization, labor market risks, and class cleavages. In P. Beramedi, S. Häusermann, H. Kitschelt, and H. Kriesi (Ed.), The politics of advanced capitalism (pp.133–156). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Demel, S., Barr, A., Miller, L., & Ubeda, P. (2018). Commitment to political ideology is a luxury only students can afford: A distributive justice experiment. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 6(1), 33–42.
  • Dimick, M., Rueda, D., & Stegmueller, D. (2018). Models of other-regarding preferences, inequality, and redistribution. Annual Review of Political Science, 21, 441–460.
  • Gingrich, J., & Ansell, B. (2012). Preferences in context: Micro preferences, macro contexts, and the demand for social policy. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1624–1654.
  • Häusermann, S., Kurer, T., & Schwander, H. (2014). High-skilled outsiders? labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review, 13(2), 235–258.
  • Häusermann, S., & Schwander, H. (2012). Varieties of dualization? labor market segmentation and insider-outsider divides across regimes. In P. Emmenegger, S.Häusermann, B. Palier, and M. Seeleib-Kaiser (Ed.), The age of dualization: The changing face of inequality in deindustrializing societies (pp. 27–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. R. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52(3), 313–349.
  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2001). An asset theory of social policy preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875–893.
  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2006). Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: Why some democracies redistribute more than others. American Political Science Review, 100(2), 165–181.
  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2015). Democratic limits to redistribution: Inclusionary versus exclusionary coalitions in the knowledge economy. World Politics, 67(2), 185–225.
  • Knotz, C., & Lindvall, J. (2015). Coalitions and compensation: The case of unemployment benefit duration. Comparative Political Studies, 48(5), 586–615.
  • Lindert, P. (2004). Growing public: Social spending and economic growth since the eighteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lupu, N., & Pontusson, J. (2011). The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review, 105(2), 316–336.
  • Malhotra, N., Margalit, Y., & Mo, C. H. (2013). Economic explanations for opposition to immigration: Distinguishing between prevalence and conditional impact. American Journal of Political Science, 57(2), 391–410.
  • Margalit, Y. (2011). Costly jobs: Trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in us elections. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 166–188.
  • Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927.
  • Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2001). Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 859–874.
  • Moene, K. O., & Wallerstein, M. (2003). Earnings inequality and welfare spending: A disaggregated analysis. World Politics, 55(4), 485–516.
  • Mosimann, N., & Pontusson, J. (2017). Solidaristic unionism and support for redistribution in contemporary Europe. World Politics, 69(3), 448–492.
  • Rehm, P. (2009). Risks and redistribution: An individual-level analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 42(7), 855–881.
  • Rehm, P. (2016). Risk inequality and welfare states: Social policy preferences, development, and dynamics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rehm, P., Hacker, J. S., & Schlesinger, M. (2012). Insecure alliances: Risk, inequality, and support for the welfare state. American Political Science Review, 106(2), 386–406.
  • Rueda, D. (2014). Dualization, crisis and the welfare state. Socio-Economic Review, 12(2), 381–407.
  • Rueda, D. (2015). The state of the welfare state: Unemployment, labor market policy, and inequality in the age of workfare. Comparative Politics, 47(3), 296–314.
  • Thewissen, S., & Rueda, D. (2017). Automation and the welfare state: Technological change as a determinant of redistribution preferences. Comparative Political Studies, 52(2), 171–200.
  • Walter, S. (2017). Globalization and the demand-side of politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods, 5(1), 55–80.