3,948
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
INTRODUCTION

Care policies in practice: how discourse matters for policy implementation

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Ahrens, P. (2018). Actors, institutions and the making of EU gender equality programs. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bacchi, C. (1999). Women, policy, and politics: The construction of policy problems. London: Sage.
  • Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game: What happens after a bill becomes a law. Cambridge: MIT press.
  • Barrett, S. M. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration, 82(2), 249–262.
  • Béland, D., Howlett, M., & Mukherjee, I. (2018). Instrument constituencies and public policy-making: An introduction. Policy and Society, 37(1), 1–13.
  • Béland, D., & Ridde, V. (2016). Ideas and policy implementation: Understanding the resistance against free health care in Africa. Global Health Governance, 10(3), 9–23.
  • Benschop, Y., & Verloo, M. (2006). “Sisyphus’ Sisters”: Can gender mainstreaming escape the genderedness of organizations? Journal of Gender Studies, 15(1), 19–33.
  • Bjarnegård, E. (2013). Gender, informal institutions and political recruitment. Explaining male dominance in parliamentary representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Blofield, M., & Haas, L. (2013). Policy outputs. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola & L. Weldon (Eds.), The oxford handbook of gender and politics (pp. 703–726). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Capano, G., & Woo, J. J. (2018). Designing policy robustness: Outputs and processes. Policy and Society, 37(4), 422–440.
  • Cavaghan, R. (2017). Bridging rhetoric and practice: New perspectives on barriers to gendered change. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1), 42–63.
  • Chappell, L., & Mackay, F. (2017). What’s in a name? Mapping the terrain of informal institutions and gender. In G. Waylen (Ed.), Towards gendering institutionalism (pp. 33–69). London: Rowman and Littlefield.
  • Ciccia, R. (2017). A two-step approach for the analysis of hybrids in comparative social policy analysis: A nuanced typology of childcare between policies and regimes. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2761–2780.
  • Ciccia, R., & Bleijenbergh, I. (2014). After the male breadwinner model? Childcare services and the division of labor in European countries. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 21(1), 50–79.
  • Ciccia, R., & Sainsbury, D. (2018). Gendering welfare state analysis: Tensions between care and paid work. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1–2), 93–109.
  • Ciccia, R., & Verloo, M. (2012). Parental leave regulations and the persistence of the male breadwinner model: Using fuzzy-set ideal type analysis to assess gender equality in an enlarged Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 507–528.
  • Collins, P. H., & Chepp, V. (2013). Intersectionality. In G. Waylen, K. Celis, J. Kantola, & L. Weldon (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics (pp. 57–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In K. Bartlett & R. Kennedy (Eds.), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender (pp. 57–80). San Francisco: Westview Press.
  • Cullen, P. (2019). The discursive politics of marketization in home care policy implementation in Ireland. Policy & Society, 1–20.
  • deLeon, P., & deLeon, L. (2002). What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 467–492.
  • Durnova, A., Fischer, F., & Zittoun, P. (2016). Discursive approaches to public policy: Politics, argumentation, and deliberation. In B. G. Peters & P. Zittoun (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to public policy (pp. 35–56). Basingstoke: Springer.
  • Dussuet, A., & Ledoux, C. (2019). Implementing the French elderly care allowance for home-based care: Bureaucratic work, professional cultures and gender frames. Policy & Society, 1–17.
  • Engeli, I., & Mazur, A. (2018). Taking implementation seriously in assessing success: The politics of gender equality policy. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(1), 111–129.
  • Eyben, R. (2010). Subversively accommodating: Feminist bureaucrats and gender mainstreaming. IDS Bulletin, 42(2), 54–61.
  • Ferree, M. M. (2006). Globalization and feminism: Opportunities and obstacles for activism in the global arena. In M. M. Ferree & A. M. Tripp (Eds.), Global feminism: Transnational women’s activism, organizing and human rights (pp. 3–24). New York and London: New York University Press.
  • Ferree, M. M., & Roth, S. (1998). Gender, class, and the interaction between social movements. A strike of west berlin day care workers. Gender & Society, 12(6), 626–648.
  • Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policies: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Goggin, M. L., Bowman, A., Lester, J. P., & O'Toole, L. J. (1990). Implementation theory and practice: Toward a third generation. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/ Little,Brown.
  • Hawkesworth, M. (2003). Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 529–550.
  • Hill, M., & Hupe, P. (2014). Implementing public policy. An introduction to the study of operational governance. London: Sage.
  • Howlett, M. (1991). Policy instruments, policy styles, and policy implementation: National approaches to theories of instrument choice. Policy Studies Journal, 19(2), 1–21.
  • Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles, and second generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17.
  • Howlett, M. (2018). Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy and Administration, 1–26.
  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford: Oxford University Press Oxford.
  • Htun, M., & Weldon, S. L. (2018). The logics of gender justice: State action on women’s rights around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hupe, P., & Saetren, H. (2015). Comparative implementation research: Directions and dualities. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17(2), 93–102.
  • Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2018). EU gender equality policies. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 331–352). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Kantola, J., & Lombardo, E. (2017). Gender and political analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  • Koslowski, A., & Koslowski, G. (2018). Fathers at work: Explaining the gaps between entitlement to leave policies and uptake. Community, Work & Family, 22(2), 1–17.
  • Krizsan, A., & Lombardo, E. (2013). The quality of gender equality policies. A discursive approach. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20(1), 77–92.
  • La Barbera, M., & Lombardo, E. (2019a). “The long and winding road”: A comparative policy analysis of multilevel judicial implementation of work‒life balance in Spain. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(1), 9–24.
  • La Barbera, M., & Lombardo, E. (2019b). Towards equal sharing of care? Judicial implementation of EU equal employment and work–Life balance policies in Spain. Policy & Society, 1–17.
  • Lascoumes, P., & Gales, P. L. (2007). Introduction: Understanding public policy through its instruments—from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21.
  • Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2(3), 159–173.
  • Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1987). Relativism, contingency, and the definition of success in implementation research. Review of Policy Research, 7(1), 116–127.
  • Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. The dilemmas of individuals in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Lombardo, E., & Meier, P. (2008). Framing gender equality in the European union political discourse. Social Politics. International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 15(1), 101–129.
  • Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (2009). The discursive politics of gender equality: Stretching, bending and policy-making. London: Routledge.
  • Lombardo, E., Meier, P., & Verloo, M. (2017). Policymaking from a gender+ equality perspective. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1), 1–19.
  • Lombardo, E., & Mergaert, L. (2013). Gender mainstreaming and resistance to gender training: A framework for studying implementation. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 21(4), 296–311.
  • Mazur, A. (2017). Toward the systematic study of feminist policy in practice: An essential first step. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 38(1), 64–83.
  • McBride, D., & Mazur, A. (2010). The politics of state feminism: Innovation in comparative research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Mergaert, L., & Lombardo, E. (2014). Resistance to implementing gender mainstreaming in EU research policy. European Integration Online Papers (Eiop), 18(1), 1–21.
  • Montoya, C. (2013). From global to grassroots: The european union, transnational advocacy and combating violence against women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • O’Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. S., & Shaver, S. (1999). States, markets, families: Gender, liberalism, and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain, and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • O’Toole, L. J. (2000). Research on policy implementation: Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 10(2), 263–288.
  • Peters, B. G. (2015). Advanced introduction to public policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Plomien, A. (2019). Gender inequality by design: Does successful implementation of childcare policy deliver gender-just outcomes?. Policy & Society, 1–20.
  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How great expectations in washington are dashed in Oakland. Berkley: University of California Press.
  • Ranci, C., & Arlotti, M. (2019). Resistance to change. The problem of high non-take up in implementing policy innovations in the Italian long-term care system. Policy & Society, 1–17.
  • Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1996). Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice. Knowledge & Policy, 9(1), 85–104.
  • Roggeband, C., & Krizsán, A. (2018). Reversing gender policy progress: Patterns of backsliding in Central and Eastern European new democracies. European Journal of Politics and Gender, 1(3), 367–385.
  • Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560.
  • Saetren, H. (2014). Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 84–105.
  • Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender, equality, and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Scala, F., Paterson, S., & Richard-Norbert, L. (2019). The gender logic and effects of instrument mixes: Implementing eldercare policy in Canada. Policy & Society, 1–18.
  • Schadler, C., Rieder, I., Schmidt, E.-M., Zartler, U., & Richter, R. (2017). Key practices of equality within long parental leaves. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(3), 247–259.
  • Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.
  • van Hooren, F. (2012). Varieties of migrant care work: Contrasting patterns of migrant labour in social care in Italy, England and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 133–147.
  • van Hooren, F. J. (2018). Intersecting social divisions and the politics of differentiation: Understanding exclusionary domestic work policy in the Netherlands. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25(1), 92–117.
  • van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(1), 92–112.
  • Verge, T., & De la Fuente, M. (2014). Playing with different cards: Party politics, gender quotas and women’s empowerment. International Political Science Review, 35(1), 67–79.
  • Voss, J.-P., & Simons, A. (2014). Instrument constituencies and the supply side of policy innovation: The social life of emissions trading. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 735–754.
  • Williams, F. (2010). Migration and care: Themes, concepts and challenges. Social Policy and Society, 9(3), 385–396.