How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2012). Stewards, mediators, and catalysts: Toward a model of collaborative leadership. Innovation Journal, 17(1), 2–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, J. C., Twombly, E. C., & de Vita, C. J. (2011). Social service agencies and program change. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(3), 378–396. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576340303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., & Lesser, C. (1996). Accountability in human services collaboratives—For what? And to whom? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 197–224. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024307
   Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2001). Rethinking democratic accountability. Washington, D.C: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beierle, T. C., & Cayford, J. (2002). Democracy in practice: Public participation in environmental decisions. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, B., & Graddy, E. A. (2010). The effectiveness of nonprofit lead-organization networks for social service delivery. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 20(4), 405–422. doi:10.1002/nml.20002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2007). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). A leadership framework for cross-sector collaboration. Public Management Review, 7(2), 177–201. doi:10.1080/14719030500090519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S, Ansell, C, Parker, C, Sørensen, E, Hart, P. T, & Torfing, J. (2020). Collaborating on collaborative governance research: introducing the collaborative governance case databank. Policy & Society.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes. Environmental Management, 54(4), 768–781. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015a). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A performance matrix. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 717–747. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015b). Collaborative governance regimes. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genskow, K. D., & Born, S. M. (2006). Organizational dynamics of watershed partnerships: A key to integrated water resources management. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 135(1), 56–64. doi:10.1111/j.1936-704X.2006.mp135001007.x
   Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. J. G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31(1), 9–41. doi:10.5465/256496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2016). Investigating collaborative processes over time a 10-year study of the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 180–200. doi:10.1177/0275074014544196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hui, I., Ulibarri, N., & Cain, B. E. (2018). Patterns of participation and representation in a regional water collaboration. Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing collaboration practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423. doi:10.1080/1471903032000146964
   Google Scholar
• Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (Not quite) joined-up world. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175. doi:10.5465/1556343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320. doi:10.1177/0095399705276111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T., Johnston, E., Pruett-Jones, M., Leong, K., & Thomsen, J. (2016). Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life cycles and developmental challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 135–144. doi:10.1002/fee.1249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., Jager, N. W., & Newig, J. (2020). Assessing collaborative conservation: A case survey of output, outcome, and impact measures used in the empirical literature. Society & Natural Resources, 33(4), 442–461. doi:10.1080/08941920.2019.1583397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 111–121. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., & Keast, R. (2007). Evaluating network arrangements: Toward revised performance measures. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 574–597.
   Google Scholar
• Marantz, N. J., & Ulibarri, N. (2019, January). The tensions of transparency in urban and environmental planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X19827638
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 95–105. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0401_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Derwort, P., & Jager, N. (2019). Sustainability through institutional failure and decline? Archetypes of productive pathways. Ecology and Society, 24(1). doi:10.5751/ES-10700-240118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Edward Challies, N. W., Jager, E. K., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297. doi:10.1111/psj.12209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2010). Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 246–263. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozen, D. E. (2018). Transparency’s ideological drift. Yale Law Journal, 128, 47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. (1983). Organizational life cycles and shifting criteria of effectiveness: Some preliminary evidence. Management Science, 29(1), 33–51. doi:10.1287/mnsc.29.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. M. (2001). Leadership in collaborative policy-making: An analysis of agency roles in regulatory negotiations. Policy Sciences, 34(3–4), 221–245. doi:10.1023/A:1012655400344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk, J. (2017). Linking stakeholder involvement to policy performance: Nonlinear effects in Dutch local government policy making. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(4), 479–495. doi:10.1177/0275074015615435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., Ulibarri, N., & Scott, R. P. (2020). Stakeholder involvement in collaborative regulatory processes: Using automated coding to track attendance and actions. Regulation & Governance, 14(2), 219–237. doi:10.1111/rego.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2001). Group development: A review of the literature and a commentary on future research directions. Group Facilitation, 3(April), 14.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Waldorff, S. B. (2014). Collaborative policy innovation: Problems and potential. Innovation Journal, 19(3), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. (2015). Tracing process to performance of collaborative governance: A comparative case study of federal hydropower licensing. Policy Studies Journal, 43(2), 283–308. doi:10.1111/psj.12096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. (1999). Task design, outcome interdependence, and individual differences: Their joint effects on effort in task-performing teams (Commentary on Huguet et al., 1999). Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3(2), 132–137. doi:10.1037//1089-2699.3.2.132
   Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P. (2003). Bringing society back in: Grassroots ecosystem management, accountability, and sustainable communities. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar