Policy integration, policy design and administrative capacities. Evidence from EU cohesion policy

References

• 6, P. (2004). Joined-up Government in the Western World in comparative perspective: A preliminary literature review and exploration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(1), 103–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of the most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., Mendez, C., & Oraže, H. (2014). From conditionality to europeanization in central and eastern europe: Administrative performance and capacity in cohesion policy. European Planning Studies, 22(4), 735–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgin, A. (2015). National binding renewable energy targets for 2020, but not for 2030 anymore: Why the European Commission developed from a supporter to a brakeman. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 690–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., Russell, S., & St Denny, E. (2016). The ‘Scottish approach’ to policy and policymaking: What issues are territorial and what are universal? Policy and Politics, 44(3), 333–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Science, 49(3), 211–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalano, S. L., Graziano, P., & Bassoli, M. (2015). Devolution and local cohesion policy: Bureaucratic obstacles to policy integration in Italy. Journal of Social Policy, 44(4), 747–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, T., Lægreid, O. M., & Lægreid, P. (2019). Administrative coordination capacity; does the wickedness of policy areas matter? Policy and Society, 38(2), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Taliawi, O. G., & Van, D. W. (2019). Developing administrative capacity: An agenda for research and practice. Policy Design and Practice, 2(3), 243–257.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2013a). Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2013b). Regulation (EU) No 1301/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the Investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., Kah, S., & Bachtler, J. (2018). Integrated territorial development: New instruments – New results? IQ-Net Thematic Paper, 42(2), European Policies Research Centre Delft.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, M., Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2008). From environmental sustainability to sustainable development? Making concepts tangible in structural funds programmes. IQ-Net Thematic Paper, 22(2), European Policies Research Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.
   Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., & Wishlade, F. (2017). The impact of European Cohesion Policy in different contexts. Regional Studies, 51(6), 817–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkin, J., & Van Wijnbergen, C. (2011). Europeanization and Welfare State Change in the UK: Another Case of ‘Fog over the Channel’? In P. R. Graziano, S. Jacquot, & B. Palier (Eds.), The EU and the Domestic Politics of Welfare State Reforms. Work and Welfare in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Saguin, K. (2018). Policy capacity for policy integration: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goals. Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy Working Paper Series. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3157448.
   Google Scholar
• Jochim, A. E., & May, P. J. (2010). Beyond Subsystems: Policy Regimes and Governance. The Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Policy paper environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The Coordination of the European Union: Exploring the Capacities of Networked Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agenda, alternatives and public policy. Boston: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. (2017). Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: Conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(1), 93–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., & Baudner, J. (2016). Cohesion policy and the green economy. In S. Piattoni & L. Polverari (Eds.), Handbook on Cohesion Policy in the EU. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lodge, M. C., & Wegrich, K. (eds). (2014). The Problem-Solving Capacity of the Modern State: Governance Challenges and Administrative Capacities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mairate, A. (2006). The ‘added value’ of European Union Cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 40(2), 167–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez, C., & Bachtler, J. (2017). Financial Compliance in the European Union: A cross-national assessment of financial correction patterns and causes in cohesion policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 569–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messina, P. (2012). Modi di regolazione dello sviluppo locale: Una comparazione per contesti di Veneto ed Emilia Romagna. Padova: Padova University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milio, S. (2007). Can administrative capacity explain differences in regional performances? Evidence from structural funds implementation in Southern Italy. Regional Studies, 41(4), 429–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenveld, A., Verhoest, K., Voets, J. & Steen, T (2019). Images of Coordination: How Implementing Organizations Perceive Coordination Arrangements. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 9–22.
   Google Scholar
• NEI Regional and Urban Development (2002). Key indicators for candidate countries to effectively manage the structural funds. Final Report. Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E., & Valotti, G. (2008). Public management reform in Italy: Explaining the implementation gap. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 174–204.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2018a). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2018b). Policy capacity in public administration. Policy and Society, 34(3–4), 219–228.
   Google Scholar
• Petridou, E., & Mintrom, M. (2020). A research agenda for the study of policy entrepreneurs. Policy Studies Journal. doi:10.1111/psj.12405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ph., T., Meyer, I., & Maggetti, M. (2019). The integration and coordination of public policies: A systematic comparative review. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 21(4), 332–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. The American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polverari, L. (2015). Does devolution increase accountability? Empirical evidence from the implementation of european union cohesion policy. Regional Studies, 49(6), 1074–1086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Introduction: Understanding integrated policy strategies and their evolution. Policy and Society, 28(2), 99–109.
   Google Scholar
• Regione Veneto (2007). Programma operative regionale 2014-2020. [Accessed 25 May 2020]. Available from https://www.regione.veneto.it/web/programmi-comunitari/documenti-di-programmazione.
   Google Scholar
• Regione Veneto (2014). Programma operative regionale 2014-2020. [Accessed 25 May 2020]. Available from https://www.regione.veneto.it/web/programmi-comunitari/fesr-2014-2020
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Garcilazo, E. (2015). Quality of government and the returns of investment: Examining the impact of cohesion expenditure in European regions. Regional Studies, 49(8), 1274–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, Co: Westeview.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2008). Highlands and Islands Scotland ERDF Operational Programme 2007-2013: Structural Funds Operational Programme. [Accessed 25 May 2020]. Available at: https://www.gov.scot/Publications/2008/07/29142448/0.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2009). Lowlands and Uplands Scotland ERDF Operational Programme 2007-2013. [Accessed 25 May 2020]. Available at: https://www.gov.scot/resource/doc/313256/0099254pdf .
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government (2014), Operational Programme under the ‘Investment for Growth and Jobs’ goal. [Accessed 25 May 2020]. Available at: https://beta.gov.scot/publications/esif-operational-programmes-2014-2020/.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government, Scottish Cities Alliance and Urban Tide (2014) Smart Cities Maturity Model and Self-Assessment Tool. Guidance Note for completion of Self-Assessment Tool, October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, M., & Bauer, M. W. (2014). Support from below? Supranational institutions, regional élites and governance preferences. Journal of Public Policy, 34(2), 237–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terracciano, B., & Graziano, P. R. (2016). EU cohesion policy implementation and administrative capacities: Insights from Italian Regions. Regional and Federal Studies, 26(3), 293–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom, I. (2019). EU Structural Funds in Scotland. Scottish Parliament Information Centre (Spice) Briefing, 10(April), 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2014). Absorption of Regional Funds: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 371–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., & Lang, A. (2017). Policy integration: Mapping the different concepts. Policy Studies, 38(6), 553–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Zwet, A., & Bachtler, J. (2018). New implementation mechanisms for integrated development strategies in ESIF. EStIF, 6(1), 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, X., Ramesh, M., & Howlett, M. (2015). Policy capacity: A conceptual framework for understanding policy competences and capabilities. Policy & Society, 34(3–4), 165–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2016). Qualitative research from start to finish. In Second Edition. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar