The demand for IPE and public policy in the governance of global policy design

References

• Acharya, A. (2007). The emerging regional architecture of world politics. World Politics, 59(4), 923–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, A. (2017). The End of American World Order. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. (2006). Making the Modern Multinational. In C. May (Ed.), Global corporate power. Boulder CO: Lynne Reinner. 32-54.
   Google Scholar
• Apter, D. (2002). Structure, contingency and choice: A comparison of trends and tendencies in political science. In J. W. Scott & D. Keates (Eds.), Schools of Thought: Twenty-Five Years of Interpretative Social Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 252-287.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1992.tb00034.x, 154–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, R. H. (1998). Analytic Narratives. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1991). Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems. The Journal of Politics, 53(4), https://doi.org/10.2307/2131866, 1044–1074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broome, A., & Quirk, J. (2015). The politics of numbers: the normative Agendas of global benchmarking. Review of International Studies, 41(5), 813–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P.-O. (2014). Public administration in the context of global governance. (K. Soonhee, S. Ashley, & W. Henry Lambright, eds.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. J. (2014). Advanced Introduction to International Political Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Coker, C. (2019). The Rise of the Civilisational State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, W., & Stone, D. (2015) ‘Global public policy: Fact or Fiction’ mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, C. (2003). private power and global authority: Transnational merchant law and the global political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, C., Haufleur, V., & Porter, T. (eds.). (1999). Private authority and international affairs. Albany: State University Press of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1962). Modern political analysis. Engelwood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, P. (1988). Advice and consent: The development of the policy sciences. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Diane, S., & Maloney, K. (eds.). (2019). The oxford handbook of global policy and transnational administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowding, K. (1995). Model or metaphor? A critical review of the policy network approach. Political Studies, 43(1), 136–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, B. (1988). Did International Economic Forces Cause the Great Depression? Contemporary Economic Policy, 6(2), 90–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.1988.tb00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: Policy enquiry in post positivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilpin, R. (1987). The political economy of international relations. New Haven: Princeton University Press. https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691022628/the-political-economy-of-international-relations
   Google Scholar
• Grieco, J. M. (1990). Cooperation among nations: Europe, America, and Non-Tariff barriers to trade. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guy, P. B., Pierre, J., & King, D. S. (2005). The politics of path dependency: political conflict in historical institutionalism. Journal of Politics, 67(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00360.x, 1275–1300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., & Biersteker, T. (eds.). (2002). The emergence of private authority in global governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. K., & Iverson, S. (eds.). (2008). Critical perspectives on private authority in global politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacmIllan.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1974). The private government of public money: community and policy inside British politics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R. (1999). Economics, Politics and (International) Political Economy: The need for a balanced diet in an era of globalisation. New Political Economy, 4(1), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R. (2021). States, civlisations and the reset of world order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R., & Reich, S. (2021) Hedging by default: European Union “Strategic Autonomy” in Binary World Order, https://www.lse.ac.uk/ideas/publications/reports/hedging-by-default,
   Google Scholar
• Higgott, R., & Watson, M. (2007). All at sea in a barbed wire canoe: Professor Cohen’s transatlantic voyage in IPE. 2008 Review of International Political Economy, 15(1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobson, J. M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Everyday Politics of the World Economy. Cambridge University Press
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (1986). The tools of government. London: Chatham House Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2011). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, S. (1993) “The clash of civilisations”, Foreign Affairs, Summer, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/1993-06-01/clash-civilizations
   Google Scholar
• John, P. (2015) ‘The three ages of public policy: Theories of policy change and variation reconsidered’. Available at SSRN 2286711 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. G., & Richardson, J. J. (1983). Policy communities: The British and European policy style. Policy Studies Journal, 11(4), 603–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J. (2003). Small States and Small States Revisited. New Political Economy, 8(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/1356346032000078705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. D. (1998). International Organization and the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 645–685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzentsein, P., Keohane, R. O., & Krasner, S. (1998). International organization and the study of world politics. International Organization, 52(4), 463–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschen, E. S. (1964). Economic policy in our time. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, J. (2003). Monetary orders. Ithaca. N.Y.: Cornell University Press. https://www.cornellpress.cornell.edu/book/9780801488405/monetary-orders/
   Google Scholar
• Koppell, J. G. S. (2014). Public administration in the context of global governance. (K. Soonhee, S. Ashley, & W. Henry Lambright, eds.). Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lake, D. (2012) ‘Why ‘isms’ are evil: theory, Epistemology, and Academic Sects as
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. (1935). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. 1951. The policy orientation In Daniel Lerner and In Harold Lasswell. Eds., The Policy Sciences: Recent developments in scope and method,3–15. Stanford: Stanford University Pres
   Google Scholar
• Lasswell, H. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy Sciences, 1(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leftwich, A. (1995). Bringing politics back in: Towards a model of the developmental state. Journal of Development Studies, 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/00220389508422370, 400–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legrand, T., & Vas, C. (2014). Framing the policy analysis of OECD and Australian VET interaction: Two heuristics of policy transfer. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 16(3), 230–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lejano, R. P. (2006). Frameworks for policy analysis: Merging text and context. Oxford, U.K.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lichbach, M. I. (2002). Is rational choice theory all of social science? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblom, C. E. (1979a). ‘Still muddling, not yet through’. Public Administration Review, 39(6), 517–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Guy Peters, B. (1988). The analysis of design or the design of analysis? Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 738–750.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Guy Peters, B. (1990). Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13(3), 303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1988). ‘The analysis of design or the design of analysis?’. Review of Policy Research, 7(4), 738–750.
   Google Scholar
• Linder, S. H., & Peters, B. G. (1990). ‘Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design’. Evaluation Program Planning, 13(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/0149-7189(90)90061-Z, 303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. (2004) “Self-binding: How America benefitted from multilateralism”, Harvard Magazine, Sept-October, harvardmagazine.com/2004/0-/self-binding.html
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1982). The rise and decline of nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1984). Power-dependence, policy communities and intergovernmental networks. Public Administration Bulletin, 49, 4–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Policy networks: A British perspective. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3), 293–317.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x, 652–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2015). Economics rules: The rights and wrongs of the dismal science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2021) “How economists and non economists can get along”, Project Syndicate, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/economists-other-social-scientists-and-historians-can-get-along-by-dani-rodrik-2021-03.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourse seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth “New Institutionalism”. European Political Science Review, 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577390999021X, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L. (2014). Epistemic arbitrage: Transnational professional knowledge in action. Journal of Professions and Organization, 1(1), 49–64.
   Google Scholar
• Seabrooke, L., & Tsingou, E. (2021). Revolving doors in international financial governance. Global Networks, 21(2), 294–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1982). Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. Boston, M.A.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skidelsky, R. (2019) “The fall of the economist’s empire” Project Syndicate, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/western-power-underpinned-universalism-of-economics-by-robert-skidelsky-2019-07?
   Google Scholar
• Skidelsky, R. (2020). What is wrong with economics: A primer for the perplexed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soonhee, K., Ashley, S., & Henry Lambright, W. (eds.). (2014). Public administration in the context of global governance. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2008). Global public policy, transnational policy communities and their networks. The Policy Studies Journal, 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00251.x, 19–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. 2015 Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1970). International relations and international economics: A case of mutual neglect. International Affairs, 46(2), 304–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strange, S. (1998). States and Markets. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Tinbergen, J. (1956). Economic policy: Principles and design. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (1985). Contextual orientation in policy analysis: The contribution of Harold D. Lasswell. Policy Sciences, 18(3), 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar