An integrated model for quantitative and qualitative description of spatial direction relations

REFERENCES

• Abdelmoty, A.I., & Williams, M.H. (1994) Approaches to the representation of qualitative spatial relations for geographic databases. Geodesy, vol. 40, pp. 204–216.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, J. (1983) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 832–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicerone, S., & Di Felice, P. (2004) Cardinal directions between spatial objects: the pairwise-consistency problem. Information Sciences, vol. 164, no. 1–4, pp. 165–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egenhofer, M., & Franzosa, R. (1991) Point-set topological spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U. (1992) Qualitative spatial reasoning about distances and directions in geographic space. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 343–371.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A.U. (1996) Qualitative spatial reasoning: cardinal directions as an example. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, R.K. (2000) Similarity assessment for cardinal directions between extended spatial objects, PHD Thesis, The University of Maine, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Haar, R. (1976) Computational models of spatial relations, Technical Report:TR-478, MSC-72-03610, Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. (1995) Qualitative distance and direction reasoning in geographic space, PHD Thesis, University of Maine, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B., & Um, K. (1999) 2D+ String: a spatial metadata to reason topological and direction relations, 11th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, IEEE, Cleveland, OH, pp. 112–122. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp = &arnumber = 787626&isnumber = 17062%20?&url = http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fstamp%2Fstamp.jsp%3Ftp%3D%26arnumber%3D787626%26isnumber%3D17062%2520%3F.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Z., Zhao, R., & Chen, J. (2002) A voronoi-based spatial algebra for spatial relations. Progress in Natural Science, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 43–51.
   Google Scholar
• Ligozat, G. (1998) Reasoning about cardinal directions. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S.L., & Chen, X. (2003) Measuring distance between spatial objects in 2D GIS. In: Shi, W.Z., Goodchild, M.F., & Fisher, P.F., eds. 2nd International Symposium on Spatial Data Quality, Hongkong Polytechnic University, Hongkong, pp. 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, L.B., & Bass, J.B. (2009) Comparing perceptual judgment and subjective measures of spatial awareness. Applied Ergonomics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 597–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, D. (2002) Qualitative reasoning with arbitrary angular directions, Spatial and Temporal Reasoning Workshop Note, AAAI, Edmonton, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mossakowski, T., & Moratz, R. (2012) Qualitative reasoning about relative direction of oriented points. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 180–181, pp. 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabil, M., Shepherd, J., & Ngu, A.H.H. (1995) 2D projection interval relations: a symbolic representation of spatial relations. Advances in Spatial Databases—4th International Symposium. Portland In: Egenhofer, M., & Herring, J., eds. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 951Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 292–309.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, S.E. (1992) Common region: a new principle of perceptual grouping. Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 436–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadias, D., Theodoridis, Y., & Sellis, T. (1994) The retrieval of direction relations using R-trees. Database and Expert Systems Applications—5th International Conference, DEXA '94. Athens, Greece In: Karagiannis, D., ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 856Springer-Verlag, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Peuquet, D., & Zhan, C.X. (1987) An algorithm to determine the directional relationship between arbitrarily-shaped polygons in the plane. Pattern Recognition, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, J., & Mitra, D. (2004) Qualitative direction calculi with arbitrary granularity. Springer. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, vol. 3157, pp. 65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, I. (1996) Indirect Perception, MIT Press, London.
   Google Scholar
• Safar, M., & Shahabi, C. (1999) 2D topological and direction relations in the world of minimum bounding circles, Proceedings of the 1999 International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., & Behr, T. (2006) Topological relationships between complex spatial objects. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, J. (1996) Integrated spatial reasoning in geographic information systems: combining topology and direction, PHD Thesis, University of Maine, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Shekhar, S., & Liu, X. (1998) Direction as a spatial object: a summary of results, The Sixth International Symposium on Advances in Geographic Information Systems, Washington, USA, pp. 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Wertheimer, M. (1923) Law of organization in perceptual forms. In: Ellis, W.D., ed. A Source Book of Gestalt Psychology, pp. 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Wolter, D., & Lee, J.H. (2010) Qualitative reasoning with directional relations. Artificial Intelligence, vol. 174, no. 18, pp. 1498–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H. (2010) Fundamental theories of spatial similarity relations in multi-scale map spaces. Chinese Geographical Science, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 18–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, H., Chu, Y., Li, Z., & Guo, R. (2006) A quantitative description model for direction relations based on direction groups. Geoinformatica, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 177–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K., & Freksa, C. (1996) Qualitative spatial reasoning using orientation, distance, and path knowledge. Applied Intelligence, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar