Usability of value-by-alpha maps compared to area cartograms and proportional symbol maps

References

• Arnold, L.M. and Wright, G., 2007. Dynamic spatial updating: a scale-independent approach to data management and thematic map revision. Spatial Sciences Institute Biennial International Conference. Hobart, Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• AxisMaps, 2015. Thematic cartography guide. Available from: http://axismaps.github.io/thematic-cartography/ [Accessed 24 October 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Brath, R. and Banissi, E., 2017. Multivariate label-based thematic maps. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (1), 45–60.10.1080/23729333.2017.1301346
   Google Scholar
• Brychtova, A. and Coltekin, A., 2016. An empirical user study for measuring the influence of colour distance and font size in map reading using eye tracking. The Cartographic Journal, 53 (3), 202–212.10.1179/1743277414Y.0000000103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, W., Miller, S., and Pettit, C., 2004. Geographical visualization: past, present and future development. Journal of Spatial Science, 49 (1), 25–36.10.1080/14498596.2004.9635003
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, R.G., Zhang, S., and Vorotyntseva, N., 2015. A concentration-based approach to data classification for choropleth mapping. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29 (10), 1845–1863.10.1080/13658816.2015.1058388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, B.D., 1993. Cartography: thematic map design. 3rd ed. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dorling, D., 1996. Area cartograms: their use and creation. Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia: Environmental Publications. ( Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography; 59).
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, M.E., 2012. Symbol considerations for bivariate thematic maps. Master’s thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, M.E., 2013. Symbol considerations for bivariate thematic maps. The 26th International Cartographic Conference, 25–30 August Dresden, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Etherington, T.R. and Perry, G.L., 2016. Visualising continuous intra-landscape isolation with uncertainty using least-cost modelling based catchment areas: common brushtail possums in the Auckland isthmus. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (1), 36–50.10.1080/13658816.2014.926365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fienberg, S.E., 1979. Graphical methods in statistics. The American Statistician, 33 (4), 165–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, J.J., 1956. The graduated circle: a description, analysis, and evaluation of a quantitative map symbol. PhD dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, P.C., et al., 2016. Cartogram: a review and prospective. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 39 (6), 211–215.
   Google Scholar
• Goodchild, M.F. and Lam, N.S.N., 1980. Areal interpolation: a variant of the traditional spatial problem. Geo-Processing, 1, 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Han, R., et al., 2017. Experimental evaluation of the usability of cartogram for representation of GlobeLand30 data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6 (6), 180.10.3390/ijgi6060180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrower, M. and Brewer, C.A., 2003. ColorBrewer.org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. The Cartographic Journal, 40 (1), 27–37.10.1179/000870403235002042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO, 2008. Part 11: guidance on usability. ISO 9241: ergonomic requirements for office work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Z.F., 2008. Cartograms for political cartography: a question of design. Master’s thesis. University of Wisconsin-Madison.
   Google Scholar
• Kerski, J.J., 2016. Critical thinking about elections maps and data. The Geography Teacher, 13 (3), 145–150.10.1080/19338341.2016.1196597
   Google Scholar
• Klippel, A., Freksa, C., and Winter, S., 2006. You-are-here maps in emergencies-the danger of getting lost. Journal of Spatial Science, 51 (1), 117–131.10.1080/14498596.2006.9635068
   Google Scholar
• Laura, J., Skinner, J.A., and Hunter, M.A., 2017. Large crater clustering tool. Computers & Geosciences, 105, 81–90.10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, H., et al., 2015. Towards measuring and visualizing sustainable national power – a case study of China and neighboring countries. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4 (3), 1672–1692.10.3390/ijgi4031672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilinger, T. and Knauff, M., 2008. Ask for directions or use a map: a field experiment on spatial orientation and wayfinding in an urban environment. Journal of Spatial Science, 53 (2), 13–23.10.1080/14498596.2008.9635147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mjelde, J.W., Penson, J.B., and Nixon, C.J., 2000. Dynamic aspects of the impact of the use of perfect climate forecasts in the Corn Belt region. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 39 (1), 67–79.10.1175/1520-0450(2000)039<0067:DAOTIO>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Nusrat, S. and Kobourov, S., 2015. Task taxonomy for cartograms. Eurographics Conference on Visualization, 25 - 29 May Cagliari, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, J.M. and Brewer, C.A., 1997. An evaluation of color selections to accommodate map users with color-vision impairments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 87 (1), 103–134.10.1111/0004-5608.00043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ondrejka, P., 2016. Mapping election results in proportional electoral systems. Journal of Maps, 12 (sup1), 591–596.10.1080/17445647.2016.1239558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyana, T.J., Rushomesa, R.I., and Bhatt, L.M., 2011. Using diffusion-based cartograms for visual representation and exploratory analysis of plausible study hypotheses: the small and big belly effect. Journal of Spatial Science, 56 (1), 103–120.10.1080/14498596.2010.521976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, M.P., Hunt, P., and Weiß, K., 2017. Mapping air population. Journal of Geovisualization and Spatial Analysis, 1 (1–2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza-Rodríguez, C., et al., 2016. Discussing state-of-the-art spatial visualization techniques applicable for the epidemiological surveillance data on the example of Campylobacter spp. in raw chicken meat. Zoonoses and Public Health, 63 (5), 358–369.10.1111/zph.2016.63.issue-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R.E., Woodruff, A.W., and Johnson, Z.F., 2010. Value-by-alpha maps: an alternative technique to the cartogram. The Cartographic Journal, 47 (2), 130–140.10.1179/000870409X12488753453372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, R.E., et al., 2017. User studies in cartography: opportunities for empirical research on interactive maps and visualizations. International Journal of Cartography, 3 (S1), 61–89.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, T.A., et al., 2001. Cognitive and usability issues in geovisualization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 28 (1), 61–75.10.1559/152304001782173998
   Google Scholar
• Speckmann, B. and Verbeek, K., 2010. Necklace maps. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 16 (6), 881–889.10.1109/TVCG.2010.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S.P., 2013. An optimized rubber-sheet algorithm for continuous area cartograms. The Professional Geographer, 65 (1), 16–30.10.1080/00330124.2011.639613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. and Li, Z.L., 2010. Effectiveness of cartogram for the representation of spatial data. The Cartographic Journal, 47 (1), 12–21.10.1179/000870409X12525737905169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, M., Wong, D., and Kronenfeld, B., 2016. A heuristic multi-criteria classification approach incorporating data quality information for choropleth mapping. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 44 (3), 246–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urquhart, K., Cartwright, W., and Miller, S., 2004. Exploring the usefullness of cartographic representations for location-based services in an Australian context. Journal of Spatial Science, 49 (1), 71–87.10.1080/14498596.2004.9635007
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Pouliot, J., and Hubert, F., 2017. How users perceive transparency in the 3D visualization of cadastre: testing its usability in an online questionnaire. GeoInformatica, 21 (3), 599–618.10.1007/s10707-016-0281-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, R. and Grubesic, T.H., 2017. An alternative classification scheme for uncertain attribute mapping. The Professional Geographer, 69(4), 604–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, A., 2015. Visualization techniques for journey to crime flow data. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 42 (2), 149–161.10.1080/15230406.2014.890545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar