Knowledge on-demand: a function of the future spatial knowledge infrastructure

References

• ALGIM, 2017. Linked data for interlinked local government, association of local government information management. Wellington, New Zealand: ALGIM, Association of Local Government Information Management, Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, L., 2016. Improving spatial data supply chains: learnings from the manufacturing industry. In: GeoProcessing 2016: The Eighth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services, Venice.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, L., 2017. GEOValue: the socioeconomic value of geospatial information. In: J. Kruse, J. Crompvoets, and F. Pearlman, eds. Value and uncertainty - supply chain challenges for producers and end users. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press and Taylor and Francis Group, 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T., July 2006. Linked data  [online]. Available from: https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O.R.A., 2001. The semantic web. Scientific American, 284 (5), 34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOSSI, 2006. Common spatial information initiative, NSW spatial information strategy. Sydney, NSW: Board of Surveying and Spatial Information New South Wales Government, Technical Report Executive Briefing of CS2i.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, C., 2016. New generation brings an on-demand revolution. The State Journal; Charleston, 32 (38), 29.
   Google Scholar
• Cisco, 2017. Cisco visual networking index: global mobile data traffic forecast update, 2016-2021. Technical Report. San Jose, CA: Cisco Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, D.J. and McLaughlin, J.D., 1998. Defining global geospatial data infrastructure (GGDI): components, stakeholders and interfaces. Geomatica, 52 (2), 129–143.
   Google Scholar
• Duckham, M., et al., 2017. Towards a spatial knowledge infrastructure. Melbourne, Australia: Australia and New Zealand Cooperative Research Centre (CRCSI). Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, K., 2016. A smarter phone becomes a personal assistant - the Boston Globe. The Boston Globe.
   Google Scholar
• Esri, September 2010. GIS best practices spatial data infrastructure  [online]. Available from: http://www.esri.com/library/bestpractices/spatial-data-infrastructure.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hausenblas, M. and Karnstedt, M., 2010. Understanding linked open data as a web-scale database. In: Second International Conference on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications  [online]. Galway, Ireland: National University of Ireland. Available from: https://aran.library.nuigalway.ie/handle/10379/1127
   Google Scholar
• Heath, T. and Bizer, C., 2011. Linked data: evolving the web into a global data space. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, P.H.J., Dessers, E., and van Hootegem, G., 2012. Reconsidering the definition of a spatial data infrastructure. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 26 (8), 1479–1494. doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.639301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivánová, I., 2019. Architecture for spatial knowledge infrastructure – presentation at locate 2019 conference  [online]. Available from: https://www.locateconference.com/2019/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Wed-P1-0910-Ivana-Ivanova.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ivánová, I., Armstrong, K., and McMeekin, D., December 2017. Provenance for the next- generation spatial knowledge infrastructure. In: 22nd International congress on modelling and simulation, (MODSIM 2017)  [online]. Hobart, Australia: Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand Inc. (MSSANZ), 410–416. Available from: http://mssanz.org.au/modsim2017/C2/ivanova.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jaconi, M., July 2014. The ‘on-demand economy’ is revolutionizing consumer behavior - here’s how. Available from: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-on-demand-economy-2014-7
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, W., March 2005. Introduction to spatial data infrastructures. Available from: http://slideplayer.com/slide/5046095/
   Google Scholar
• Manisa, M. and Nkwae, B., 2007. Developing botswana spatial data infrastructure. From concept to reality. In: Proceedings of the General assemble and working week, Hong Kong SAR, China, Federation Internationale De Geometres (FIG). Hong Kong SAR, China: INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF SURVEYORS.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, B., October 2005. Building spatial knowledge infrastructure. In: J. Jiang, ed. ISPRS workshop on service and application of spatial data infrastructure. Hangzhou: ISPRS, 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Masser, I., 2005. GIS worlds creating spatial data infrastructures. ESRI, Redlands.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council, 1993. Toward a coordinated spatial data infrastructure for the nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nebert, D.D., 2004. Developing spatial data infrastructures: the SDI cookbook. Global Spatial Data Infrastructure (GSDI) Association. Available from: http://gsdiassociation.org/images/publications/cookbooks/SDICookbookGSDI2004ver2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nedovic-Budic, Z., 2011. Spatial data infrastructure: north and south. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, 2017. Key issues for digital transformation in the G20. oecd.org.
   Google Scholar
• OGC, 2018. Best practices. Available from: http://www.opengeospatial.org/docs/bp [Accessed 16 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Poikola, A., et al., 2009. The open data handbook. Available from: http://opendatahandbook.org/guide/en/ [Accessed 16 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Rajabifard, A., 2007. SDI design to facilitate spatially enabled society. In: A. Rajabifard (Ed.), Towards a spatially enabled society. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Rajabifard, A. and Williamson, I.P., 2001. Spatial data infrastructures: concept, SDI hierarchy and future directions. In: Proceedings of the GEOMATICS’80 Conference  [online], Tehran, Iran. Available from: https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/handle/11343/33897
   Google Scholar
• Reed, T.W., et al., 2016. Geographic metadata searching with semantic and spatial filtering methods. In: GEOProcessing 2016:The Eighth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services, Venice, Italy. IARIA.
   Google Scholar
• Schatsky, D., Muraskin, C., and Gurumurthy, R., 2015. Cognitive technologies: The real opportunities for business. Deloitte. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/deloitte-review/issue-16/cognitive-technologies-business-applications.html [Accessed 24 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, A., Ramakrishnan, C., and Thomas, C., 2005. Semantics for the semantic web: the implicit, the formal and the powerful. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 1 (1), 1–18. doi:10.4018/IJSWIS
   Google Scholar
• Siao Him Fa, J., 2018. A brokering approach to federating spatial data in a semantic web environment. PhD diss. Curtin University.
   Google Scholar
• Siao Him Fa, J., et al., 2016. Brokered approach to federating data using semantic web techniques. In: GEOProcessing 2016: TheEighth International Conference on Advanced Geographic Information Systems, Applications, and Services, Venice.
   Google Scholar
• Steiniger, S. and Hunter, A.J.S., 2012. Free and open source GIS software for building a spatial data infrastructure. In: E. Bocher and M. Neteler, eds. Geospatial free and open source software in the 21st century. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 247–261.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, K., et al., 2012. To ontologise or not to ontologise: an information model for a geospatial knowledge infrastructure. Computers & Geosciences, 45, 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, D., 2016. Google now handles at least 2 trillion searches per year. Available from: https://searchengineland.com/google-now-handles-2-999-trillion-searches-peryear-250247 [Accessed 16 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C.B., et al., 2017. CIAO-WPS - utilizing semantic web (web 3.0) techniques to assist in the automatic orchestration of geospatial processes and datasets. In: C. Grueau, R. Laurini, and J.G. Rocha, eds. Geographical information systems theory, applications and management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 32–48.
   Google Scholar
• UN, 2017. Compendium on licensing of geospatial information. New York: United Nations, Technical Report June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• W3C, 2014a. Government linked data (GLD) working group. Available from: https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/MainPage [Accessed 16 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• W3C, 2014b. RDF - resource description framework, February. W3C.
   Google Scholar
• W3C, 2017. W3C DATA ACTIVITY building the web of data. Available from: https://www.w3.org/2013/data/ [Accessed 16 August 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Woodgate, P., et al., 2017. The Australian approach to geospatial capabilities; positioning, earth observation, infrastructure and analytics: issues, trends and perspectives. Geo-spatial Information Science, 20 (2), 109–125. doi:10.1080/10095020.2017.1325612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, F., et al., 2018. Semantic web technologies automate geospatial data conflation: conflating points of interest data for emergency response services. In: P. Kiefer, et al., eds. Progress in location based services 2018. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 111–131.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, L., 2014. A developer’s guide to the semantic web. 2nd ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C., Zhao, T., and Li, W., 2015. Geospatial semantic web. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar