Exploring different approaches for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in Manipur: a comparative study of AHP, FR, machine learning, and deep learning models

References

• Achour, Y. and Pourghasemi, H.R., 2020. How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geoscience Frontiers, 11 (3), 871–883. doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2019.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabameri, A., et al. 2020. Landslide susceptibility evaluation and management using different machine learning methods in the Gallicash River Watershed, Iran. Remote Sensing, 12 (3), 475. doi:10.3390/rs12030475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balamurugan, G., Ramesh, V., and Touthang, M., 2016. Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using frequency ratio and fuzzy gamma operator models in part of NH-39, Manipur, India. National Hazards, 84 (1), 465–488. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2434-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabb, E.E., 1995. The san mateo county California gis project for predicting the consequences of hazardous geologic processes. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-8404-3_15.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman, L., 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning, 45 (1), 5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bröcker, J. and Smith, L.A., 2007. Scoring probabilistic forecasts: the importance of being proper. Weather Forecast, 22 (2), 382–388. doi:10.1175/WAF966.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bui, D.T., et al. 2020. Comparing the prediction performance of a deep learning neural network model with conventional machine learning models in landslide susceptibility assessment. Catena, 188, 104426. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2019.104426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara, A., 1983. Multivariate models for landslide hazard evaluation. Journal of the International Association for Mathematical Geology, 15 (3), 403–426. doi:10.1007/BF01031290.
   Google Scholar
• Catani, F., et al. 2013. Landslide susceptibility estimation by random forests technique: sensitivity and scaling issues. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 13 (11), 2815–2831. doi:10.5194/nhess-13-2815-2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chacón, J., et al. 2006. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 65 (4), 341–411. doi:10.1007/s10064-006-0064-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al. 2018a. Landslide susceptibility modelling using GIS-based machine learning techniques for Chongren County, Jiangxi Province, China. Science of the Total Environment, 626, 1121–1135. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., et al. 2018b. Performance evaluation of the GIS-based data mining techniques of best-first decision tree, random forest, and naïve Bayes tree for landslide susceptibility modeling. Science of the Total Environment, 644, 1006–1018. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J.S., Huang, H.Y., and Hsu, C.Y., 2020. A kNN based position prediction method for SNS places. In: Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-42058-1_22.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, C.J.F. and Fabbri, A.G., 2003. Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. National Hazards, 30 (3), 451–472. doi:10.1023/B:NHAZ.0000007172.62651.2b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes, C., Vapnik, V., and Saitta, L., 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine Learning, 20 (3), 273–297. doi:10.1007/BF00994018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristianini, N. and Shawe-Taylor, J., 2000. An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based learning methods. An Introduction to Support Vector Machine Other Kernel-Based Learning Methods, Mar. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511801389.
   Google Scholar
• Cruden, D.M., 1996. Cruden, dm, varnes, dj, 1996, landslide types and processes, transportation research board, us national academy of sciences, special report, 247: 36–75.Transp Res Board, 247, 36–57.
   Google Scholar
• Damaševičius, R., 2010. Optimization of SVM parameters for recognition of regulatory DNA sequences. TOP, 18 (2), 339–353. doi:10.1007/s11750-010-0152-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietrich, W.E., et al. 1995. A process-based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data. Hydrological Process, 9 (3–4), 383–400. doi:10.1002/HYP.3360090311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, A., Zhang, Q., Zhou, X., and Dai, B., 2017. Automatic recognition of landslide based on CNN and texture change detection. In: Proceedings - 2016 31st Youth Academic Annual Conference of Chinese Association of Automation, YAC 2016. doi: 10.1109/YAC.2016.7804935.
   Google Scholar
• Felicísimo, Á.M., et al. 2013. Mapping landslide susceptibility with logistic regression, multiple adaptive regression splines, classification and regression trees, and maximum entropy methods: a comparative study. Landslides, 10 (2), 175–189. doi:10.1007/s10346-012-0320-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlani, S. and Ninfo, A., 2015. Is the present the key to the future? Earth-Science Review, 142, 38–46. doi:10.1016/J.EARSCIREV.2014.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghorbanzadeh, O., et al. 2019. Evaluation of different machine learning methods and deep-learning convolutional neural networks for landslide detection. Remote Sensing, 11 (2), 196. doi:10.3390/rs11020196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, J.N., et al. 2015. Evaluating machine learning and statistical prediction techniques for landslide susceptibility modeling. Computers & Geosciences, 81, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grizonnet, M., et al. 2017. Orfeo ToolBox: open source processing of remote sensing images. Open Geospatial Data, Software Stand, 2 (1). doi:10.1186/s40965-017-0031-6.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, F., et al. 1999. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology, 31 (1–4), 181–216. doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00078-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, F., et al. 2005. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology, 72 (1–4), 272–299. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzetti, F., et al. 2012. Landslide inventory maps: new tools for an old problem. Earth-Science Reviews, 112 (1–2), 42–66. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D., et al. 2023a. Cross-city matters: a multimodal remote sensing benchmark dataset for cross-city semantic segmentation using high-resolution domain adaptation networks. Remote Sensing of Environment, 299, 113856. doi:10.1016/J.RSE.2023.113856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, D., et al. 2023b. SpectralGPT: spectral remote sensing foundation model. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 1–18. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2024.3362475.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, H., Pourghasemi, H.R., and Pourtaghi, Z.S., 2016. Landslide susceptibility assessment in Lianhua County (China): a comparison between a random forest data mining technique and bivariate and multivariate statistical models. Geomorphology, 259, 105–118. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanevski, M., Pozdnoukhov, A., and Timonin, V., 2009. Machine learning for spatial environmental data: theory, applications and software. Machine Learning for Spatial Environmental Data: Theory, Applications, and Software, 1–371. doi:10.1201/9781439808085/MACHINE-LEARNING-SPATIAL-ENVIRONMENTAL-DATA-MIKHAIL-KANEVSKI-VADIM-TIMONIN-ALEXI-POZDNUKHOV.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Hong, S.M., and Jung, H.S., 2017. A support vector machine for landslide susceptibility mapping in Gangwon Province, Korea. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9 (1), 48. doi:10.3390/su9010048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-P., Chu, H.J., and Wu, C.F., 2010. Spatial pattern analysis of landslide using landscape metrics and logistic regression: a case study in Central Taiwan. Hydrology Earth System Science Discuss, 7 (3), 3423–3451.
   Google Scholar
• Marjanović, M., Bajat, B., and Kovačević, M., 2009. Landslide susceptibility assessment with machine learning algorithms. In: International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems IncoS 2009, 273–278. doi:10.1109/INCOS.2009.25.
   Google Scholar
• Muraina, I.O., 2022. Ideal dataset splitting ratios in machine learning algorithms: general concerns for data scientists and data analysts. In: 7th International Mardin Artuklu Science Research Conference (February), 496–504. Available. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358284895_IDEAL_DATASET_SPLITTING_RATIOS_IN_MACHINE_LEARNING_ALGORITHMS_GENERAL_CONCERNS_FOR_DATA_SCIENTISTS_AND_DATA_ANALYSTS Accessed: May 1, 2024. [Online].
   Google Scholar
• Okendro, M., Kushwaha, R.A.S., and Goel, O.P., 2023. A study of landslides along part of a national highway in Manipur, India short communication, 2021. [Online]. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349126046_A_Study_of_Landslides_along_part_of_a_National_Highway_in_Manipur_India_Short_Communication [Accessed 21 September, 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Park, N.W., 2015. Using maximum entropy modeling for landslide susceptibility mapping with multiple geoenvironmental data sets. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73 (3), 937–949. doi:10.1007/s12665-014-3442-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa, F., et al., 2011. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pourghasemi, H.R. and Rahmati, O., 2018. Prediction of the landslide susceptibility: which algorithm, which precision? Catena, 162, 177–192. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2017.11.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1 (1), 83. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590
   Google Scholar
• Shirzadi, A., et al. 2018. Novel GIS based machine learning algorithms for shallow landslide susceptibility mapping. Sensors (Switzerland), 18 (11), 3777. doi:10.3390/s18113777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, C.D., Behera, K.K., and Rocky, W.S., 2011. Landslide susceptibility along NH-39 between Karong and Mao, Senapati district, Manipur. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 78 (6), 559–570. doi:10.1007/s12594-011-0120-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tien Bui, D., et al. 2016. Spatial prediction models for shallow landslide hazards: a comparative assessment of the efficacy of support vector machines, artificial neural networks, kernel logistic regression, and logistic model tree. Landslides, 13 (2), 361–378. doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0557-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakhshoori, V., et al. 2019. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based data mining algorithms. Water (Switzerland), 11 (11), 2292. doi:10.3390/w11112292.
   Google Scholar
• Vojteková, J. and Vojtek, M., 2020. Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomatics, Natural Hazards Risk, 11 (1), 131–148. doi:10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Fang, Z., and Hong, H., 2019. Comparison of convolutional neural networks for landslide susceptibility mapping in Yanshan County, China. Science of the Total Environment, 666, 975–993. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C., et al. 2012. GIS-based support vector machine modeling of earthquake-triggered landslide susceptibility in the Jianjiang River watershed, China. Geomorphology, 145–146, 70–80. doi:10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2011.12.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yalcin, A., 2008. GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. CATENA, 72 (1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/J.CATENA.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, X., Tham, L.G., and Dai, F.C., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on support vector machine: a case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology, 101 (4), 572–582. doi:10.1016/J.GEOMORPH.2008.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz, I., 2010. The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60 (3), 505–519. doi:10.1007/s12665-009-0191-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef, A.M., et al. 2016. Landslide susceptibility mapping using random forest, boosted regression tree, classification and regression tree, and general linear models and comparison of their performance at Wadi Tayyah Basin, Asir Region, Saudi Arabia. Landslides, 13 (5), 839–856. doi:10.1007/s10346-015-0614-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, W. and Du, S., 2016. Spectral–spatial feature extraction for hyperspectral image classification: a dimension reduction and deep learning approach. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing: A Publication of the IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Society, 54 (8), 4544–4554. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2016.2543748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, C., et al. 2018. Landslide susceptibility modeling applying machine learning methods: a case study from longju in the Three Gorges reservoir area, China. Computers & Geosciences, 112, 23–37. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar