Limited Use Only: Exploring the Design of Everyday Objects for Upper Limb Stroke Rehabilitation

References

• Andrews, Keith, and Jean Steward. 1979. “Stroke Recovery: He Can but Does He?” Rheumatology 18 (1): 43–48.10.1093/rheumatology/18.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berzina, Guna, Markuu Paanalahti, Åsa Lundgren-Nilsson, and Katharina S. Sunnerhagen. 2013. “Exploration of Some Personal Factors with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core sets for stroke.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 45 (7): 609–615.10.2340/16501977-1171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, Gunnel, Anders Möller, and Christian Blomstrand. 2004. “A Qualitative Study of the Consequences of ‘Hidden Dysfunctions’ One Year after a Mild Stroke in Persons < 75 Years.” Disability and Rehabilitation 26 (23): 1373–1380.10.1080/09638280400000211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cirstea, M. C., and M. F. Levin. 2007. “Improvement of Arm Movement Patterns and Endpoint Control Depends on Type of Feedback During Practice in Stroke Survivors.” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21 (5): 398–411.10.1177/1545968306298414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colman, Andrew M. 2009. A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordreference.com/views/BOOK_SEARCH.html?book=t87.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, Michael. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. London; Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dancause, Numa, Sylvie Nadeau, and Serge Rossignol, eds. 2015. Sensorimotor Rehabilitation: At the Crossroads of Basic and Clinical Sciences. Progress in Brain Research 218. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Ehn, Pelle, and Peter Ullmark. 2017. “Educating the Reflective Design Researcher.” In Practice Based Design Research, edited by Laurene Vaughan, 77–86. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, William. 2012. “What Should We Expect from Research through Design?” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 937–946. Austin, Texas: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Gresham, G. E. 1986. “Stroke Outcome Research.” Stroke; a Journal of Cerebral Circulation 17 (3): 358–360.10.1161/01.STR.17.3.358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, Steven R., and John M. Carroll. 2007. “Theoretical Design Science in Human–Computer Interaction: A Practical Concern?” Artifact 1 (3): 159–171.10.1080/17493460701872016
   Google Scholar
• ICF Research Branch. 2013. “Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Stroke”. Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Stroke. http://www.icf-research-branch.org/download/send/12-cardiovascularandrespiratoryconditions/199-comprehensive-icf-core-set-stroke.
   Google Scholar
• Krogh, Peter Gall, Thomas Markussen, and Anne Louise Bang. 2015. “Ways of Drifting – Five Methods of Experimentation in Research Through Design”. In ICoRD’15 – Research into Design Across Boundaries Volume 1, edited by Amaresh Chakrabarti, 34, 39–50. New Delhi: Springer India. doi:10.1007/978-81-322-2232-3_4.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, Gert, Boudewijn Kollen, and Eline Lindeman. 2004. “Understanding the Pattern of Functional Recovery after Stroke: Facts and Theories.” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience 22 (3–5): 281–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel, G., B. Kollen, and J. Twisk. 2006. “Impact of Time on Improvement of Outcome After Stroke.” Stroke 37 (9): 2348–2353.10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Heather M., and Ricardo Viana. 2016. “Constraint-Induced Therapies.” In Ischemic Stroke Therapeutics, edited by Bruce Ovbiagele, 217–223. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-17750-2_21.10.1007/978-3-319-17750-2
   Google Scholar
• McKay, Judith, and George A. Mensah. 2004. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Sterr, Annette, Susanna Freivogel, and Dieter Schmalohr. 2002. “Neurobehavioral Aspects of Recovery: Assessment of the Learned Nonuse Phenomenon in Hemiparetic Adolescents.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83 (12): 1726–31. doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. C., and S. C. Cramer. 2013. “Patient-Reported Measures Provide Unique Insights Into Motor Function After Stroke.” Stroke 44 (4): 1111–1116.10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub, E., G. Uswatte, V. W. Mark, and D. M. M. Morris. 2006. “The Learned Nonuse Phenomenon: Implications for Rehabilitation.” Europa Medicophysica 42 (3): 241–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teasell, Robert, Swati Mehta, Shelialah Pereira, Amanda McIntyre, Shannon Janzen, Laura Allen, Liane Lobo, and Ricardo Viana. 2012. “Time to Rethink Long-Term Rehabilitation Management of Stroke Patients.” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 19 (6): 457–462.10.1310/tsr1906-457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarahn, E., L. Alon, S. L. Ryan, R. M. Lazar, M.-S. Vry, C. Weiller, R. S. Marshall, and J. W. Krakauer. 2011. “Prediction of Motor Recovery Using Initial Impairment and fMRI 48 h Poststroke.” Cerebral Cortex 21 (12): 2712–2721.10.1093/cercor/bhr047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar