Binary by Design: Unfolding Corporeal Segregation at the Intersection of Gender, Identity and Materiality

References

• Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. “Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others.” American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783–790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzaldúa, Gloria. 1987. Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, David. 2006. “Europe, Technology and Colonialism in the 20th Century.” History and Technology: An International Journal 21 (1): 85–106.
   Google Scholar
• Attfield, Judith. 1989. “FORM/female FOLLOWS FUNCTION/male: Feminist Critiques of Design.” In Design History and the History of Design, edited by John A. Walker, 199–221. London: Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3): 801–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Zeev, Avi, and Tara C. Dennehy. 2014. “When Boys Wear Pink: A Gendered Color Cue Violation Evokes Risk Taking.” Psychology of Men and Masculinity 15 (4): 486–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brulé, Emeline, and Tiphaine Kazi-Tani. 2015. “Disputing Ergonomics. Deconstructing Users. A Queer Perspective on Design.” Design History Society, San Francisco. Accessed August 4, 2016. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01246059/document.
   Google Scholar
• Buckley, Cheryl. 1986. “Made in Patriarchy: Toward a Feminist Analysis of Women and Design.” Design Issues 3 (2): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castrodale, Mark Anthony, and Laura Lane. 2015. “Finding One’s Place to Be and Pee: Examining Intersections of Gender-Dis/ability in Washroom Signage.” Atlantis: Critical Studies in Gender, Culture & Social Justice 37 (1): 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavanagh, Sheila L. 2010. Queering Bathrooms: Gender, Sexuality and Hygienic Imagination. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clerke, Teena. 2010. “Gender and Discipline: Publication Practices in Design.” Journal of Writing in Creative Practice 3 (1): 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Cockburn, Cynthia, and Susan Ormrod. 1993. Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, Kimberlé. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum (PhilPapers) 140: 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Doloughan, Fiona J. 2002. “The Language of Reflective Practice in Art and Design.” Design Issues 18 (2): 57–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss, Henry. 1955. Designing for People. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, Richard. 2005. “The Matter of Whiteness.” In White Privilege: Essential Readings on the Other Side of Racism, edited by Paula S. Rothenberg, 9–14. New York: Worth Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrnberger, Karin, Minna Räsänen, and Sara Ilsted. 2012. “Visualising Gender Norms in Design: Meet the Mega Hurricane Mixer and the Drill Dolphia.” International Journal of Design 6 (3): 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 1993. “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough.” The Sciences 33 (2): 20–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fanon, Frantz. [1959]1965. “Algeria Unveiled.” In A Dying Colonialism, translated by Haakon Chevalier, 35–67. New York: Grove Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, Tony. 1995. “A Geography of Power: Design History and Marginality.” In The Idea of Design, edited by Victor Margolin and Richard Buchanan, 204–218. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geczy, Adam, and Vicki Karaminas. 2013. Queer Style. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Julie A. 2002. “Deconstructing Binary Race and Sex Categories: A Comparison of the Multiracial and Transgendered Experience.” San Diego Law Review 39: 917–942.
   Google Scholar
• Havenhand, Lucinda K. 2004. “A View from the Margin: Interior Design.” Design Issues 20 (4): 32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinchman, Mark. 2013. “Interior Design History: Some Reflections.” Journal of Interior Design 38 (1): 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaygan, Pınar. 2016. “Gender, Technology, and the Designer’s Work: A Feminist Review.” Design and Culture 8 (2): 235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koller, Veronika. 2008. “‘Not just a Colour’: Pink as a Gender and Sexuality Marker in Visual Communication.” Visual Communication 7 (4): 395–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, Léopold. 2017. “Introduction: Architecture and the Norm: The Violence of a Continuous Reciprocity.” The Funambulist 13: 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lorber, Judith. 1996. “Beyond the Binaries: Depolarizing the Categories of Sex, Sexuality, and Gender.” Sociological Inquiry 66 (2): 143–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lugones, María. 2007. “Heterosexualism and the Colonial/Modern Gender System.” Hypatia 22 (1): 186–209.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, María. 2010. “Toward a Decolonial Feminism.” Hypatia 25 (4): 742–759.
   Google Scholar
• Maher, Gabriel Ann. 2015. “De__Sign, Revealing the Condition of the Mediated Body.” In Proceedings of the Cumulus Conference, The Virtuous Circle—Design Culture and Experimentation, 3–7 June 2015, edited by Luisa Collina, Laura Galluzzo and Anna Meroni, 1051–1065. Milano: McGraw-Hill Education Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Mignolo, Walter D. 2011. The Darker Side of Western Modernity: Global Futures, De-colonial Options. Durham, NC: Duke Univeristy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Najmabadi, Afsaneh. 2006. “Beyond the Americas: Are Gender and Sexuality Useful Categories of Analysis?” Journal of Women’s History 18 (1): 11–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Mimi Thi. 2011. “The Biopower of Beauty: Humanitarian Imperialisms and Global Feminisms in an Age of Terror.” Signs 36 (2): 359–383.
   Google Scholar
• Oyewùmí, Oyéronké. 1997. The Invention of Women: Making an African Sense of Western Gender Discourses. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pater, Ruben. 2016. The Politics of Design: A (Not So) Global Manual for Visual Communication. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, Barbara. 2013. Bathroom. London: Reaktion Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Petzen, Jennifer. 2012. “Contesting Europe: A Call for an Anti-modern Sexual Politics.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 19 (1): 97–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, Minh-Ha T. 2011. “The Right to Fashion in the Age of Terrorism.” Signs 36 (2): 385–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin, John. 2016. “The Pink Elephant in the Room: What Ever Happened to Queer Theory in the Study of Interior Design 25 Years On?” Journal of Interior Design 41 (1): 5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preciado, Beatriz. 2013. Testo Junkie: Sex, Drugs, and Biopolitics in the Pharmacopornographic Era. New York: Feminist Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preciado, Beatriz. 2014. Pornotopia: An Essay on Playboy’s Architecture & Biopolitics. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, Anibal. 2000. “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America.” Nepantla: Views from South 1 (3): 533–580.
   Google Scholar
• Rommes, Els. 2006. “Gender Sensitive Design Practices.” In Encyclopedia of Gender and Information Technology, edited by Eileen M. Trauth, 675–681. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgwick, Eve K. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparke, Penny. 1995. As Long as It’s Pink: The Sexual Politics of Taste. London: Pandora Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Oost, Ellen. 2003. “Materialized Gender: How Shavers Configure the Users’ Femininity and Masculinity.” In How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technologies, edited by Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch, 193–208. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar