Social Design in Turkey through a Survey of Design Media: Projects, Objectives, Participation Approaches

References

• Altay, C., V. Kortun, and M. Elveren. 2017. PARK: Bir Ihtimal [Hatırlama]. Istanbul: SALT.
   Google Scholar
• Aquilino, M. 2011. Beyond Shelter: Architecture and Human Dignity. New York: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, L., J. Bailey, G. Julier, and L. Kimbell. 2014. Social Design Futures: HEI Research and the AHRC. Brighton: University of Brighton; London: Victoria and Albert Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Balcıoğlu, T., and B. Emgin. 2014. “Recent Turkish Design Innovations: A Quest for Identity.” Design Issues 30 (2): 97–111. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, B. 2004. Good Deeds, Good Design: Community Service Through Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., and K. Wakeford, eds. 2008. Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism. New York: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, T., G. De Michelis, P. Ehn, G. Jacucci, P. Linde, and I. Wagner. 2011. Design Things. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Ceschin, F., and I. Gaziulusoy. 2016. “Evolution of Design for Sustainability: From Product Design to Design for System Innovations and Transitions.” Design Studies 47: 118–163. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D.-S., L.-L. Cheng, C. Hummels, and I. Koskinen. 2015. “Social Design: An Introduction.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connelly, R., and P. Bal. 2016. “Local Networks of Resilience and Climate Adaption: The Case of Istanbul.” In Climate Change Adaptation, Resilience and Hazards, edited by Walter Leal Filho, Haruna Musa, Gina Cavan, Paul O’Hare, Julia Seixas, 109–123. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Davey, C. L., A. B. Wootton, A. Thomas, and R. Cooper, and M. Press 2005. “Design for Surreal World?: a New Model of Socially Responsible Design.” Paper presented at the 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, Bremen, Germany, March 29–31.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2012. Adversarial Design. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Er, Ö., and Ç. Kaya. 2008. “Problems or Opportunities? Overcoming the Mental Barrier for Socially Responsible Design in Turkey.” The Design Journal 11 (2): 159–181. doi: 10.2752/175630608X329235.
   Google Scholar
• Erözçelik, A., and B. Taşdizen. 2017. “Designing on the Spot: Learning from the Social Design Projects in Gökçeada/Imbros Island.” The Design Journal 20 (supp1):S1751–S1764. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352696.
   Google Scholar
• Fathy, H. 1973. Architecture for the Poor: An Experiment In Rural Egypt. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K. 2013. “Social Entrepreneurs and Social Designers: Change Makers with a New Mindset?” International Journal of Business and Social Science 4 (16): 9–17.
   Google Scholar
• Fuad-Luke, A. 2009. Design Activism: Beautiful Strangeness for a Sustainable World. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, B. 1969. Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Hillgren, P.-A., A. Seravalli, and A. Emilson. 2011. “Prototyping and Infrastructuring in Design for Social Innovation.” CoDesign 7 (3-4): 169–183. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.630474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julier, G. 2011. “Political Economies of Design Activism and the Public Sector.” Paper presented at Nordic Design Research Conference, Helsinki, May 29-31.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, Ç. 2015. “New Product Development through Design: The Case of Craftswomen in Mardin.” Millî Folklor 27 (106): 88–100.
   Google Scholar
• Kaygan, H., and G. Julier, eds. 2013. “Global Design Activism Survey.” Design and Culture 5 (2): 237–252. doi: 10.2752/175470813X13638640370850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, Ç., and K. Gelmez. 2013. “Intervening with Design: Building Platforms for Grassroots Empowerment in Communities of Practice in Turkey.” Paper presented at Crafting the Future, 10th European Academy of Design Conference, Göteborg University, Sweden, April 17-19.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. 2012. “Doing Template Analysis.” In Qualitative Organizational Research: Core Methods And Current Challenges, edited by Gillian Symon and Catherine Cassell, 426–451. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kıyak İngin, A. 2011. Made in Şişhane: Istanbul, Üretim ve Tasarım Üzerine. Edited by Pelin Derviş. Istanbul: Salt.
   Google Scholar
• Koskinen, I., and G. Hush. 2016. “Utopian, Molecular and Sociological Social Design.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepik, A. 2010. Small Scale, Big Change: New Architectures of Social Engagement. New York: MoMA.
   Google Scholar
• Madge, P. 1997. “Ecological Design: A New Critique.” Design Issues 13 (2): 44–54. doi: 10.2307/1511730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation, translated by Rachel Coad. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., and F. Rizzo. 2011. “Small Projects/Large Changes: Participatory Design as an Open Participated Process.” CoDesign 7 (3-4): 199–215. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.630472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, E., L. Collina, and S. Evans, eds. 2004. Solution Oriented Partnership: How to Design Industrialised Sustainable Solutions. Milton Keynes: Oscar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, V., and S. Margolin. 2002. “A ‘Social Model’ of Design: Issues of Practice and Research.” Design Issues 18 (4): 24–30. doi: 10.1162/074793602320827406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, T. 2013. “The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design between Art and Politics.” Design Issues 29 (1): 38–50. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markussen, T. 2017. “Disentangling ‘the Social’ in Social Design’s Engagement with the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 160–174. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2017.1355001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClintock, N. 2014. “Radical, Reformist, and Garden-Variety Neoliberal: Coming to Terms with Urban Agriculture’s Contradictions.” Local Environment 19 (2): 147–171. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.752797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKee, A. 2003. Textual Analysis: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Melles, G., I. de Vere, and V. Misic. 2011. “Socially Responsible Design: Thinking beyond the Triple Bottom Line to Socially Responsive and Sustainable Product Design.” CoDesign 7 (3-4): 143–154. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.630473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meroni, A., ed. 2007. Creative Communities: People Inventing Sustainable Ways of Living. Milan: Edizioni POLI.design.
   Google Scholar
• Morelli, N. 2007. “Social Innovation and New Industrial Contexts: Can Designers ‘Industrialize’ Socially Responsible Solutions?” Design Issues 23 (4): 3–21. doi: 10.1162/desi.2007.23.4.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortati, M., and B. Villari. 2014. “Design for Social Innovation. Building a Framework of Connection between Design and Social Innovation.” Paper presented at Fourth Service Design and Innovation conference, Lancaster, April 9-11.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. 1985. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. Illinois: Academy Chicago Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sanoff, H. 2000. Community Participation Methods in Design and Planning. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. E. 2007. Design for the Other 90%. New York: Cooper-Hewitt Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Social Impact Design Summit 2013. Design and Social Impact: A Cross-Sectoral Agenda for Design Education, Research and Practice. New York: Smithsonian Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Tauke, B., K. Smith, and C. Davis, eds. 2015. Diversity and Design: Understanding Hidden Consequences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A. 2008. “Design as Activism: A Conceptual Tool.” Paper presented at Changing the Change on Design Visions, Proposals and Tools, Torino, July 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, A., and L. Gamman. 2011. “Design with Society: Why Socially Responsive Design Is Good Enough.” CoDesign 7 (3-4): 217–230. doi: 10.1080/15710882.2011.630477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, C. 2015. “Is Social Design a Thing?” Accessed 4 February 2018. http://www.academia.edu/11623054/Is_Social_Design_a_Thing
   Google Scholar
• Töre Yargın, G., A. Karadoğaner, and D. Oğur, eds. 2018. UTAK 2018 Bildiri Kitabı: Tasarım ve Umut. Ankara: ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
   Google Scholar
• Unteidig, A., B. Domínguez Cobreros, E. Calderon-Lüning, and G. Joost. 2017. “Digital Commons, Urban Struggles and the Role of Design.” The Design Journal 20 (supp1): S3106–S3120. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2017.1352818.
   Google Scholar
• Veiga, I., and R. Almendra. 2014. “Social Design Principles and Practices.” Paper presented at Design Research Society Conference, Umea University, Sweden, June 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, S. 2010. “Temporal Objects—Design, Change and Sustainability.” Sustainability 2 (3): 812–832. doi: 10.3390/su2030812.
   Google Scholar
• Whiteley, N. 1993. Design for Society. London: Reaktion.
   Google Scholar