From Guests and Guides to Collaborators: Negotiating Roles in Design and Biology Collaborations

References

• Agapakis, Christina M. 2014. “Designing Synthetic Biology.” ACS Synthetic Biology 3 (3): 121–128. doi:10.1021/sb4001068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonelli, Paola, and Hugh Aldersey-Williams. 2008. Design and the Elastic Mind. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
   Google Scholar
• Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian MacKenzie, and Paul Martin. 2015. Taking Roles in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: Reflections on Working in Post-ELSI Spaces in the UK Synthetic Biology Community. Science & Technology Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, Andrew, Georgina Born, and Gisa Weszkalnys. 2008. “Logics of Interdisciplinarity.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 20–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude Vincent, Bernadette. 2015. “Life by Design: Philosophical Perspectives on Synthetic Biology.” In BIO Web of Conferences, Vol. 4, 00015. Les Ulis: EDP Sciences. doi:10.1051/bioconf/20150400015.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, Gui. 2007. “The Uneasy Relationship between Design and Design Research.” In Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects, edited by Ralf Michel, 25–39. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel. doi:10.1007/978-3-7643-8472-2_2.
   Google Scholar
• Breakwell, Glynis M. 2006. “Interviewing Methods.” In Research Methods in Psychology, edited by John Smith, 232–253. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camere, Serena, and Elvin Karana. 2017. “Growing Materials for Product Design.” Paper presented at the EKSIG 2017: Alive. Active. Adaptive Conference, Delft, June.
   Google Scholar
• Catts, Oron, and Ionat Zurr. 2014. “Growing for Different Ends.” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 56 (November): 20–29. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2014.09.025.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chieza, Natsai, and Alexandra Daisy Ginsberg. 2018. “Editorial: Other Biological Futures.” Journal of Design and Science 4 (September). doi:10.21428/566868b5.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, Victoria, and Virginia Braun. 2014. “Thematic Analysis.” In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research, edited by Alex C. Michalos, 6626–6628. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3470.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, James. 2012. “Synthetic Biology: bits and Pieces Come to Life.” Nature 483 (7387): S8–S10. doi:10.1038/483S8a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2008. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design. (4th ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Emily. 2009. “On Constructing Collaborations between Engineers, Designers and Publics.” In Material Beliefs, edited by Kerridge, Tobie, 132–136. London: Goldsmiths University.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, Norman K., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1994. Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Driver, Alex, Carlos Peralta, and James Moultrie. 2011. “Exploring How Industrial Designers Can Contribute to Scientific Research.” International Journal of Design 5 (1): 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, Antony, and Fiona Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything. Design, Fiction and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elowitz, Michael, and Wendell A. Lim. 2010. “Build Life to Understand It.” Nature 468 (7326): 889–890. doi:10.1038/468889a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freemont, Paul, and Richard Kitney. 2012. Synthetic Biology: A Primer. London: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Pengcheng. 2006. “A Perspective of Synthetic Biology: Assembling Building Blocks for Novel Functions.” Biotechnology Journal 1 (6): 690–699. doi:10.1002/biot.200600019.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ginsberg, Alexandra Daisy, Jane Calvert, Pablo Schyfter, Alistair Elfick, and Drew Endy. 2014. Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology’s Designs on Nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hara, Noriko, Paul Solomon, Seung-Lye Kim, and Diane H. Sonnenwald. 2003. “An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists’ Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors That Impact Collaboration.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (10): 952–965. doi:10.1002/asi.10291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John-Steiner, Vera. 1998. “Creativity and Collaboration, a Sociocultural Approach.” Paper presented at the Annual Research Lecture, Office of Research Services. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2007. “Design Research, an Oxymoron?” In Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects, edited by R. Michel, 67–80. Basel: Now Publisher Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Leahey, Erin. 2016. “From Sole Investigator to Team Scientist: Trends in the Practice and Study of Research Collaboration.” Annual Review of Sociology 42 (1): 81–100. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-081715-074219.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Suzanne, and Christina Agapakis. 2018. “Design with Science.” Journal of Design and Science 4 (1), September. https://jods.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/issue4-agapakis-lee.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Arthur I. 2014. Colliding Worlds: How Cutting–Edge Science is Redefining Contemporary Art. London: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, James. 2015. “Understanding and Classifying the Role of Design Demonstrators in Scientific Exploration.” Technovation 43–44: 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myer, William. 2012. Biodesign, Nature, Science, Creativity. High Holborn: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, Neri. 2016. “Age of Entanglement.” Journal of Design and Science 1.
   Google Scholar
• Peralta, C., and James Moultrie. 2010. “Collaboration between Designers and Scientists in the Context of Scientific Research: A Literature Review.” In DS 60: Proceedings of DESIGN 2010, the 11th International Design Conference, 1643–1652. Dubrovnik.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Stephanie M., and Jennifer Reich. 2006. “Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships.” American Journal of Community Psychology 38 (1–2): 1–7. 38: 1-7. doi:10.1007/s10464-006-9064-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, Chris. 2004. “Unstated Contributions: how Artistic Inquiry Can Inform in\Ter-Disciplinary Research.” Design Issues 20 (4): 76–85. doi:10.1162/0747936042311959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldana, Johnny. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert A. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald, Diane H. 1996. “Communication Roles That Support Collaboration during the Design Process.” Design Studies 17 (3): 277–301. doi:10.1016/0142-694X(96)00002-6.
   Google Scholar
• Sonnenwald, Diane H. 2007. “Scientific Collaboration.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 643–681. doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121.
   Google Scholar