The Emotive and Semantic Content of Pattern: An Introductory Analysis

References

• Arnheim, R. 1954. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. B. 1960. Emotion and Personality. Vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bar, M., and M. Neta. 2006. “Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects.” Psychological Science 17 (8): 645–648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertamini, M., L. Palumbo, T. N. Gheorghes, and M. Galatsidas. 2016. “Do Observers like Curvature or Do They Dislike Angularity?” British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953) 107 (1): 154–178. doi:10.1111/bjop.12132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bietoletti, S. 2005. Neoclassicism and Romanticism. New York: Sterling Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Broug, E. 2013. Islamic Geometric Design. London: Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Cassirer, E. 1962. An Essay on Man. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, F. D. K., and S. P. Juroszek. 1998. Design Drawing. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Christie, A. 1969. Pattern Design: An Introduction to the Study of Formal Ornament. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D. J. 2010. Water and Art: A Cross-Cultural Study of Water as Subject and Medium in Modern and Contemporary Artistic Practice. London: Reaktion Books.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D. 2003. Watches Tell More than Time: Product Design, Information, and the Quest for Elegance. New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, G. L. 1996. “Affective Synesthesia: Extracting Emotion Space from Simple Perceptual Stimuli.” Motivation and Emotion 20 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1007/BF02251005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruell, W., I. Mateiciucová, and O. Nieuwenhuyse. 2017. Painted Pots, Painting People: Late Neolithic Ceramics in Ancient Mesopatamia. Barnsley: Oxbow Books.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. 2003. “A Multilayered Model of Product Emotions.” The Design Journal 6 (2): 4–13. doi:10.2752/146069203789355480.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A. 2012. “Faces of Product Pleasure: 25 Positive Emotions in Human-Product Interactions.” International Journal of Design 6 (2): 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmet, P. M. A., and P. Hekkert. 2014. “Special Issue Editorial: Design & Emotion.” International Journal of Design 2 (3): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. New York: Perigee Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, Paul, Wallace V. Freisen, and Sonia Ancoli. 1980. “Facial Signs of Emotional Experience.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (6): 1125–1134. doi:10.1037/h0077722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, D. H. 1984. “Local and Global Computational Factors in Visual Pattern Recognition.” In Figural Synthesis, edited by P. C. Dodwell and T. Caelli, 83–115. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, O., and F. Schwappach. 1973. “Studies in Early Celtic Design.” World Archaeology 4 (3): 339–356. doi:10.1080/00438243.1973.9979544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. 1920. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Puerto, G., E. Munar, and M. Nadal. 2015. “Preference for Curvature: A Historical and Conceptual Framework.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9: 712. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann, M. 2012. Structure and Form in Design: Critical Ideas for Creative Practice. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, M. A. 2013. Symbol, Pattern & Symmetry: The Cultural Significance of Structure. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P. 2006. “Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design Design Aesthetics: Principles of Pleasure in Design.” Psychology Science 48 (2): 157–172.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, P., and M. Berghman. 2016. “The Beauty of Balance – an Empirical Integration of the Unified Model of Aesthetics for Product Design.” In 2016 Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Hiscock, N. 2007. The Symbol at Your Door: Number and Geometry in Religious Architecture of the Greek and Latin Middle Ages. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hogarth, W. [1753] 1997. The Analysis of Beauty. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, D. [1738] 1985. A Treatise of Human Nature. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2008. Lines: A Breif History. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2010. “The Textility of Making.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1): 91–102. doi:10.1093/cje/bep042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. 2015. The Life of Lines. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. 2009. “Emotion Theory and Research: Highlights, Unanswered Questions, and Emerging issues.” Annual Review of Psychology 60 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, W. 1884. “What is an Emotion?” Mind 9 (34): 188–205.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, O. [1856] 2008. The Grammar of Ornament. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, P. W. 2002. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, C. G. 1991. The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (Collected Works of C.G. Jung). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karana, E., P. Hekkert, and P. Kandachar. 2009. “Meanings of Materials through Sensorial Properties and Manufacturing Processes.” Materials & Design 30 (7): 2778–2784. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. 2005. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K., and R. Butter. 1984. “Product Semantics: Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form.” Innovations 3: 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leder, H., B. Belke, A. Oeberst, and D. Augustin. 2004. “A Model of Aesthetics Appreciation and Aesthetic Judgment.” British Journal of Psychology 95 (4): 489–508. doi:10.1348/0007126042369811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leder, H., and M. Nadal. 2014. “Ten Years of a Model of Aesthetic Appreciation and Aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode-Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics.” British Journal of Psychology (London, England: 1953) 105 (4): 443–446. doi:10.1111/bjop.12084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lévy, P. 2013. “Beyond Kansei Engineering: The Emancipation of Kansei Design.” International Journal of Design 7 (2): 83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitrovic, B. 1998. “Paduan Aristotelianism and Daniele Barbaro's Commentary on Vitruvius' De Architectura.” Sixteenth Century Journal 29 (3): 667–688. doi:10.2307/2543683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanda, U., D. Pati, H. Ghamari, and R. Bajema. 2013. “Lessons from Neuroscience: form Follows Function, Emotions Follow Form.” Intelligent Buildings International 5 (sup1): 61–78. doi:10.1080/17508975.2013.807767.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, D. A. 2004. Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Palumbo, L., and M. Bertamini. 2016. “The Curvature Effect.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 34 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1177/0276237415621185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panofsky, E. 1939. Studies in Iconology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pevsner, N. 1960. Pioneers of Modern Design: From William Morris to Walter Gropius. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pile, J. 2000. A History of Interior Design. London: Laurence King Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pinna, B. 2010. “New Gestalt Principles of Perceptual Organization: An Extension from Grouping to Shape and Meaning.” Gestalt Theory 23 (1): 11–78.
   Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. 1980. Emotion, a Psychoevolutionary Synthesis. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Poffenberger, A. T., and B. E. Barrows. 1924. “The Feeling Value of Lines.” Journal of Applied Psychology 8 (2): 187–205. doi:10.1037/h0073513.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. 2003. “Core Affect and the Psychological Construction of Emotion.” Psychological Review 110 (1): 145–172. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.110.1.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado-Montejo, A., C. J. Salgado, J. Alvarado, and C. Spence. 2017. “Simple Lines and Shapes Are Associated with, and Communicate, Distinct Emotions.” Cognition & Emotion 31 (3): 511–525. doi:10.1080/02699931.2015.1133401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. [1916] 2013. Course in General Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., A. Schorr, and T. Johnstone. 2001. Appraisal Processes in Emotion: Theory, Methods, Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, Phillip, Judith Schwartz, Donald Kirson, and Cary O'Connor. 1987. “Emotion Knowledge: Further Exploration of a Prototype Approach.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1061–1086. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., and C. M. Barona. 2009. “Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference.” Empirical Studies of the Arts 27 (1): 25–42. doi:10.2190/EM.27.1.b.
   Google Scholar
• Urquhart, L., and A. Wodehouse. 2018. “The Line Model of Form and Emotion: Perspectives on Western Design.” Human Technology 14 (1): 27–66. doi:10.17011/ht/urn.201805242751.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, D. 1982. Geometric Patterns and Borders. London: Wildwood House Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, D. K., and D. S. Crowe. 1988. Symmetries of Culture: Theory and Practice of Plane Pattern Analysis. Washington, DC: University of Washington Press
   Google Scholar