The Ulm School of Design Discourse: A Foundation for Sustainable Design

References

• Aicher, Otl. 1975. “Die Hochschule Für Gestaltung. Neun Stufen Ihrer Entwicklung.” Archithese 15: 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• AIGA. n.d. “Design for Good.” https://www.aiga.org/design-for-good.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, Yorick. 2017. “A Journey of Two Designers.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 173–191. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhamra, Tracy, Ricardo Hernandez, and Richard Mawle. 2013. “Sustainability: Methods and Practices.” In The Handbook of Design for Sustainability, 106–120. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, Gui. 1965. “Education for Visual Design. Lectures ‘toward New Commitments and Disciplines in Design, Painting and Art Education’ American Institute of Graphic Arts, New York.” Ulm 12/13: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, Gui. 1999. Del Objeto a la Interfase: mutaciones Del Diseño. Buenos Aires: Infinito.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, Gui. 2003. “The Relevance of the Ulm School of Design Today.” In Ulmer Modelle, Modelle Nach Ulm: Hochschule Für Gestaltung Ulm 1953–1968, edited by HfG-Archiv Ulm, 124–133. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Bonsiepe, Gui. 2012. “DHUB Sessions: Disseny i Crisi. Reflexions Sobre l’HfG Ulm Des Del Context Actual.” Presented at the disseny de sistemes. escola d’ulm, Barcelona, España, January 26. https://vimeo.com/36023897.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Sarah. 2011. “Design for Social Innovation: An Interview With Ezio Manzini.” Shareable. July 26, 2011. https://www.shareable.net/blog/design-for-social-innovation-an-interview-with-ezio-manzini.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, Jonathan, ed. 2017. Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Tim. 2017. “Which Way to Turn? Product Longevity and Business Dilemmas in the Circular Economy.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 405–422. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Curdes, Gerhard. 2012. “The Social Relevance of the Ulm Model.” In HfG IUP IFG: Ulm 1968–2008, 64–69. Ulm: IFG.
   Google Scholar
• Dubberly, Hugh. 2008. “Design in The Age of Biology: Shifting From a Mechanical-Object Ethos to an Organic-Systems Ethos.” Dubberly Design Office. 2008. http://www.dubberly.com/articles/design-in-the-age-of-biology.html.
   Google Scholar
• Dubberly, Hugh, and Paul Pangaro. 2015. “Cybernetics and Design: Conversations for Action.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing 22 (2/3): 73–82.
   Google Scholar
• Frascara, Jorge. 2019. “The Science of Design: Tomás Maldonado, Buenos Aires 1922–Milano 2018.” Design Issues 35 (2): 93–96. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry, Tony. 2009. Design Futuring: Sustainability, Ethics, and New Practice. English ed. Oxford; New York: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, Ken. 1964. “Ken Garland:Published Writing: First Things First.” http://kengarland.co.uk/KG-published-writing/first-things-first/
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, Brigitte. 2003. “Experiment 53/68.” In Ulmer Modelle, Modelle Nach Ulm: Hochschule Für Gestaltung Ulm 1953–1968, 16–33. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Ifg Ulm, GmbH, René Spitz, and Regula Stämpfli. eds. 2012. HfG IUP IFG: Ulm 1968–2008. Ulm: Stiftung Hochschule für Gestaltung HfG Ulm.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2006. The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design. Boca Raton: CRC/Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2008. “Designing in Ulm and off Ulm.” In Hfg Ulm. Die Abteilung Produktgestaltung – 39 Rückblicke, 55–72. Dortmund: Verlag Dorothea Rohn.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2019. “Re: Re Ulm (Long Post),” March 19, 2019. https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/cgi-bin/webadmin?A2=ind1903&L=PHD-DESIGN&P=R11662.
   Google Scholar
• Lindinger, Herbert, ed. 1991. “Ulm Design: The Morality of Objects = Hochschule Für Gestaltung Ulm 1953–1968.” Translated by David Britt. 1st MIT Press ed. Cambridge, MaA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, Dan. 2017. “Design with Intent and the Field of Design for Sustainable Behaviour.” In Living Labs, edited by David V. Keyson, Olivia Guerra-Santin, and Dan Lockton, 75–88. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lockton, Dan, and Veronica Ranner. 2017. “Plans and Speculated Actions: Design, Behaviour and Complexity in Sustainable Futures.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 487–501. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lunar. 2008. “LUNAR: The Designer’s Field Guide to Sustainability.” 2008. http://www.lunar.com/fieldguide.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, Tomás. 1958. “ “New Developments in Industry and the Training of the Designer.” Ulm 2: 26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, Tomás. 1965. “Opinions ‘the Emergent World: A Challenge to Architectural and Industrial Design Training.” Ulm 12/13: 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, Tomás. 1966. “How to Fight Complacency in Design Education.” Ulm 17/18: 14–20.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado, Tomás. 2004. “Proyectar Hoy.” In 2 Textos Recientes. La Plata: Nodal.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2009. “New Design Knowledge.” Design Studies 30 (1): 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2013. “Small, Local, Open and Connected. Resilient Systems and Sustainable Qualities: Design Observer.” Design Observer. February 6, 2013. http://designobserver.com/feature/small-local-open-and-connected-resilient-systems-and-sustainable-qualities/37670.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, Ezio. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen, Thomas. 2013. “The Disruptive Aesthetics of Design Activism: Enacting Design between Art and Politics.” Design Issues 29 (1): 38–50. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonough, William, and Michael Braungart. 2002. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. 1st ed. New York: North Point Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows, DonellaH, L. Dennis, Jørgen Meadows, WilliamW. Randers, and I. I. I. Behrens. 1972. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moles, Abraham A. 1965. “Opinion ‘Theory of Complexity and Technical Civilization.’” Ulm 12/13: 11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Moles, Abraham A. 1967. “Theory ‘Functionalism in Crisis.” Ulm 19/20: 24–25.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Sehun. 2017. “From an Ecodesign Guide to a Sustainable Design Guide: Complementing Social Aspects of Sustainable Product Design Guidelines.” Archives of Design Research 30 (2): 47–65. doi:10.15187/adr.2017.05.30.2.47.
   Google Scholar
• Ohl, Herbert. 1965. “Industrialized Building with Steel.” Ulm 14/15/16: 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Ohl, Herbert. 1968. “Planning the Pattern of Living.” Ulm 21: 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, VictorJ. 1971. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. 1st American ed. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Miles. 2017. “Print to Repair: 3D Printing and Product Repair.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 236–249. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polak, Paul. 2009. Out of Poverty: What Works When Traditional Approaches Fail. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, Marcela. 2003. “Is the Means the End?” In Ulmer Modelle, Modelle Nach Ulm: Hochschule Für Gestaltung Ulm 1953–1968, 56–71. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Rachel, Carson. 1962. Silent Spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rinker, Dagmar. 2003. “Industrial Design is Not an Art’ – Tomás Maldonado’s Contribution to the Creation of a New Professional Identity.” In Ulmer Modelle, Modelle Nach Ulm: Hochschule Für Gestaltung Ulm 1953–1968, 38–49. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz.
   Google Scholar
• Roericht, Hans. n.d. “TC 100.” Roericht.Net. https://roericht.net/tc-100/tc100
   Google Scholar
• Schnaidt, Claude. 1964. “Prefabricated Hope.” Ulm 10/11: 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaidt, Claude. 1965. “A School of Architecture.” Ulm 14/15/16: 69–70.
   Google Scholar
• Schnaidt, Claude. 1967. “Theory ‘Architecture and Political Commitment.” Ulm 19: 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Shedroff, Nathan, and L. Hunter Lovins. 2009. Design is the Problem the Future of Design Must Be Sustainable. Brooklyn, N.Y.: Rosenfeld Media.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, HerbertA. 1996. The Sciences of the Artificial. 3rd ed. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Damon. 2017. “A Brief History of (Un)Sustainable Design.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 11–24. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thackara, John. 2012. “Blood Minerals and Cellphones.” Design Observer. April 2, 2012. http://designobserver.com/feature/blood-minerals-and-cellphones/33218.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, Cameron. 2011. “I [Heart] Sustainability (Because Necessity No Longer Has Agency).” Design Philosophy Papers 9 (2): 69–80. doi:10.2752/144871311X13968752924554.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, Cameron. 2017. “Transitions in Sociotechnical Conditions That Afford Usership: Sustainable Who?.” In Routledge Handbook of Sustainable Product Design, 349–358. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• White, Phillip, Louise St. Pierre, and Steve Belletire. 2013. Okala Practitioner:Integrating Ecological Design. Phoenix, AZ: IDSA.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Brigitte. 2008. “Diseño Sustentable.” In Historia Del Diseño En América Latina Y El Caribe: Industrialización Y Comunicación Visual Para La Autonomía, 324–333. São Paulo: Editora Blücher.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Brigitte. 2013. “5th Sustainable Summer School. The Culture(s) of Sustainability.” Sustainable Summer School. 2013. http://www.sustainable-summer-school.org.
   Google Scholar