Theory-Driven or Theory-Informed? A Review of Behavioural Economics in Design

References

• Adams, Alexander T, Jean Costa, Malte F. Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2015. “Mindless Computing: Designing Technologies to Subtly Influence Behavior.” Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 719–730. UbiComp ’15. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2750858.2805843.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, Icek. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology, edited by Julius Kuhl and Jürgen Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Andor, Mark A., and Katja M. Fels. 2018. “Behavioral Economics and Energy Conservation – A Systematic Review of Non-Price Interventions and Their Causal Effects.” Ecological Economics 148: 178–210. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ariely, Dan. 2010. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York, NY: Harper Perennial.
   Google Scholar
• Arno, Anneliese, and Steve Thomas. 2016. “The Efficacy of Nudge Theory Strategies in Influencing Adult Dietary Behaviour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” BMC Public Health 16 (1): 676. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3272-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artefact Group. n.d. “Behavior Change Strategy Cards.” Artefact. https://www.artefactgroup.com/case-studies/behavior-change-strategy-cards/.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, Michelle. 2017. Behavioural Economics: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. Oxford: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broers, Valérie J. V., Céline De Breucker, Stephan Van den Broucke, and Olivier Luminet. 2017. “A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Nudging to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Choice.” European Journal of Public Health 27 (5): 912–920. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckx085.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, Philip J., Charlotte Gram Hartlev, and Christine Boysen Durazo. 2017. “Behavioural Design: A Process for Integrating Behaviour Change and Design.” Design Studies 48: 96–128. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2016.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuah, Swee-Hoon, and James Devlin. 2011. “Behavioural Economics and Financial Services Marketing: A Review.” International Journal of Bank Marketing 29 (6): 456–469. doi:10.1108/02652321111165257.
   Google Scholar
• Cialdini, Robert B. 2009. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, Mette Trier, and Helena Skyt Nielsen. 2018. “Nudging in Education.” Economics of Education Review 64: 313–342. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta, Saugato, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2014. “Behavioral Design: A New Approach to Development Policy.” Review of Income and Wealth 60 (1): 7–35. doi:10.1111/roiw.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan, Paul, Michael Hallsworth, David Halpern, Dominic King, and Ivo Vlaev. 2010. “Mindspace: Influencing Behaviour through Public Policy - Putting People First - Experientia.” Institute for Government and the Cabinet Office. www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, Kees. 2015. “Frame Creation and Design in the Expanded Field.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1 (1): 22–33. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2015.07.003.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Matthew A. 2006. “The Law, Marketing and Behavioral Economics of Consumers Rebates.” Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance 12: 362–424.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J. 2002. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (Interactive Technologies). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Fogg, B. J., and Jason Hreha. 2010. “Behavior Wizard: A Method for Matching Target Behaviors with Solutions.” In Persuasive Technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 117–131. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_13.
   Google Scholar
• Gino, Francesca. 2017. “Uber Shows How Not to Apply Behavioral Economics.” Harvard Business Review, April 13. https://hbr.org/2017/04/uber-shows-how-not-to-apply-behavioral-economics.
   Google Scholar
• Goffart, Klaus, Michael Schermann, Christopher Kohl, Jörg Preißinger, and Helmut Krcmar. 2016. “Using the Default Option Bias to Influence Decision Making While Driving.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 32 (1): 39–50. doi:10.1080/10447318.2015.1085747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaratne, Junius, and Oded Nov. 2015. “Informing and Improving Retirement Saving Performance Using Behavioral Economics Theory-Driven User Interfaces.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 917–920. CHI ’15. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2702123.2702408.
   Google Scholar
• Hermsen, Sander, Sander Mulder, Reint Renes, and Remko Van der Lugt. 2015. “Using the Persuasive by Design-Model to Inform the Design of Complex Behavior Change Concepts: Two Case Studies.” 11th International Conference of the European Academy of Design (EAD 11), 1–10. Paris, France. https://research.tue.nl/en/publications/using-the-persuasive-by-design-model-to-inform-the-design-of-comp.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, Teck H., Noah Lim, and Colin F. Camerer. 2006. “Modeling the Psychology of Consumer and Firm Behavior with Behavioral Economics.” Journal of Marketing Research 43 (3): 307–331. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.3.307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, Daniel. 2003. “Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics.” American Economic Review 93 (5): 1449–1475. doi:10.1257/000282803322655392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2007. “Design Research, an Oxymoron?.” In Design Research Now. Essays and Selected Projects, edited by Ralf Michel, 67–80. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Lambe, Fiona, Ylva Ran, Marie Jürisoo, Stefan Holmlid, Cassilde Muhoza, Oliver Johnson, and Matthew Osborne. 2020. “Embracing Complexity: A Transdisciplinary Conceptual Framework for Understanding Behavior Change in the Context of Development-Focused Interventions.” World Development 126: 104703. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, MinKyung, Sara Kiesler, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. “Mining Behavioral Economics to Design Persuasive Technology for Healthy Choices.” Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 325–334. CHI ’11. New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/1978942.1978989.
   Google Scholar
• Lilley, Debra. 2009. “Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Strategies and Perceptions.” Design Studies 30 (6): 704–720. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2009.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockton, Dan, David Harrison, and Neville A. Stanton. 2010. “The Design with Intent Method: A Design Tool for Influencing User Behaviour.” Applied Ergonomics 41 (3): 382–392. . doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2009.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejía, G. Mauricio. 2021. “Using Nudges as Design Principles: Mindful Guidance for Behavior Change.” Journal of Design Strategies10 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald. 1988. The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Donald, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2015. “DesignX: Complex Sociotechnical Systems.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1 (2): 83–106. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2016.01.002.
   Google Scholar
• Prochaska, James O., and Wayne F. Velicer. 1997. “The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change.” American Journal of Health Promotion 12 (1): 38–48. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Sarah, and Ruth Schmidt. 2018. “A New Model for Integrating Behavioral Science and Design.” Behavioral Scientist, September 18. http://behavioralscientist.org/a-new-model-for-integrating-behavioral-science-and-design/.
   Google Scholar
• Richburg-Hayes, Lashawn, Caitlin Anzelone, Nadine Dechausay, Saugato Datta, Alexandra Fiorillo, Louis Potok, Matthew Darling, and John Balz. 2014. “Behavioral Economics and Social Policy: Designing Innovative Solutions for Programs Supported by the Administration for Children and Families.” 2014–16a. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2466597.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/15710880701875068.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Elizabeth, and PieterJan Stappers. 2012. Convivial Design Toolbox: Generative Research for the Front End of Design. Amsterdam, Netherlands: BIS Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scheiber, Noam. 2017. “How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Drivers’ Buttons.” The New York Times, April 2, sec. Technology. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Selinger, Evan, and Kyle Whyte. 2011. “Is There a Right Way to Nudge? The Practice and Ethics of Choice Architecture.” Sociology Compass 5 (10): 923–935. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00413.x.
   Google Scholar
• Service, Owain, Michael Hallsworth, David Halpern, Felicity Algate, Rory Gallagher, Sam Nguyen, Simon Ruda, and Michael Sanders. 2014. “EAST: Four Simple Ways to Apply Behavioural Insights.” The Behavioural Insights Team. https://www.bi.team/publications/east-four-simple-ways-to-apply-behavioural-insights/.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Herbert Alexander. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, Cass R. 2016. “People Prefer System 2 Nudges (Kind of).” Duke Law Journal 66 (1): 121–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tantia, Piyush. 2017. “The New Science of Designing for Humans.” Stanford Social Innovation Review (blog). https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_new_science_of_designing_for_humans.
   Google Scholar
• Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Design Council. 2014. “The Design Process: What Is the Double Diamond?” Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/news-opinion/design-process-what-double-diamond.
   Google Scholar
• Tromp, Nynke, Paul Hekkert, and Peter-Paul Verbeek. 2011. “Design for Socially Responsible Behavior: A Classification of Influence Based on Intended User Experience.” Design Issues 27 (3): 3–19. doi:10.1162/DESI_a_00087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lieren, Anne, Calabretta Giulia, and Jan Schoormans. 2018. “Rational Overrides: Influence Behaviour beyond Nudging.” Design Research Society Conference - DRS 2018, 2163–2176. Limerick, Ireland: DRS.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, Ned. 2010. “A Marketer’s Guide to Behavioral Economics.” McKinsey Quarterly.
   Google Scholar