A Framework for Transitioning Designerly Ways: Interrogating 50 Years of Inclusive Design for Paediatric Mobility

References

• Aguirre, M., N. Agudelo, and J. Romm. 2017. “Design Facilitation as Emerging Practice: Analyzing How Designers Support Multi-Stakeholder Co-Creation.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (3): 198–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.11.003.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., and A. Gash. 2007. “Collaborative Governance in Theory.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–571. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björklund, T., A., T. Keipi, and H. Maula. 2020. “Crafters, Explorers, Innovators, and co-Creators: Narratives in Designers’ Identity Work.” Design Studies 68: 82–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbe, T., J. Krzywinski, and C. Woelfel. 2016. “A Comparison of Design Process Models from Academic Theory and Professional Practice.” International Design Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, Nathan, Niina Kolehmainen, Jennifer McAnuff, Louise Tanner, Lorna Tuersley, Fiona Beyer, Aimee Grayston, et al. 2020. “Powered Mobility Interventions for Very Young Children with Mobility Limitations to Aid Participation and Positive Development: The EMPoWER Evidence Synthesis.” Health Technology Assessment, 24 (50): 1–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.3310/hta24500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bruner, J. 1991. “The Narrative Construction of Reality.” Critical Inquiry 18 (1): 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/448619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, C. 2009. Effective Mobility for Children with Motor Disabilities, 1–36. Seattle, Washington: GHO Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Carlgren, L., I. Rauth, and M. Elmquist. 2016. “Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment.” Creativity and Innovation Management 25 (1): 38–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey, J., G. Paleg, and R. Livingstone. 2013. “Facilitating Child Participation through Power Mobility.” British Journal of Occupational Therapy 76 (3): 158–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.4276/030802213X13627524435306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarkson, J., and R. Coleman. 2015. “History of Inclusive Design in the UK.” Applied Ergonomics 46 (B): 235–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costanza-Chock, S. 2020. Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies 3 (4): 221–227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Desmet, P., and E. Dijkhuis. 2003. “A Wheelchair Can Be Fun: A Case of Emotion-Driven Design.” In Proceedings of the International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. 2003, 22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, J. 1982. “Problem Finding and Solving.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 16 (2): 97–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1982.tb00326.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everard, L. 1983. “The Wheelchair Toddler”. Contact Magazine (Radar), November 1983. Accessed 01 May 2020. http://www.daneverard.co.uk/mobility/article02.php.
   Google Scholar
• Feldner, H., S. Logan, and J. Galloway. 2016. “Why the Time is Right for a Radical Paradigm Shift in Early Powered Mobility: The Role of Powered Mobility Technology Devices, Policy and Stakeholders.” Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 11 (2): 89–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1079651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flodin, E. 2008. “The Desire for Autonomous Upright Mobility: A Longitudinal Case Study.” Technology and Disability 19 (4): 213–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2007-19407.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, K., A. Hamraie, M. Mills, and D. Serlin. 2019. “Introduction to Special Section.” Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5 (1): 1–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.31998.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, M., C. Cardoso, and P. Badke-Schaub. 2014. “What Inspires Designers? Preferences on Inspirational Approaches during Idea Generation.” Design Studies 35 (1): 29–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, M., and A. Booth. 2009. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information and Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, C., M. 2013. “Factors That Shape Design Thinking.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 18 (3): 8–20.
   Google Scholar
• Grimaldi, S., S. Fokkinga, and I. Ocnarescu. 2013. “Narratives in Design: A Study of the Types, Applications and Functions of Narratives in Design Practice.” In Sixth International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 2013, 201–210.
   Google Scholar
• Grocott, L. 2012. “Designerly Ways of Researching: Design Knowing and the Practice of Researching.” Studies in Material Thinking 6: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, P., J. Furumasu, and D. Tefft. 2013. “The Positive Effects of Early Powered Mobility on Children's Psychosocial and Play Skills.” Assistive Technology : The Official Journal of RESNA 25 (1): 39–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.685824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, T., C. Tonkinwise, and G. Kossoff. 2020. “Transition Design: An Educational Framework for Advancing the Study and Design of Sustainable Transitions.” Notebooks of the Center for Design and Communication Studies 105: 31–65.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsone, L. 2017. “Critical Design as Approach to Next Thinking.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S4253–S4262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S. Kim. 2013. “Sociotechnical Imaginaries and National Energy Policies.” Science as Culture 22 (2): 189–196. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2013.786990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensenius, A. R. 2012. “Disciplinarities: Intra, Cross, Multi, Inter, Trans”. Accessed 05 May 2020. http://www.arj.no/2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2/
   Google Scholar
• Johansson-Sköldberg, U., J. Woodilla, and M. Çetinkaya. 2013. “Design Thinking: Past, Present and Possible Futures.” Creativity and Innovation Management 22 (2): 121–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. 2019. “Designerly Ways of Futuring: Virtual Reality as a Foresight Tool for Long Term Sustainability.” Third International Anticipation Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Keast, R., K. Brown, and M. Mandell. 2007. “Getting the Right Mix: Unpacking Integration Meanings and Strategies.” International Public Management Journal 10 (1): 9–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490601185716.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, W. C., J. C. Diehl, and J. M. L. van Engelen. 2018. “Facing Complexity through Varying the Clarification of the Design Task”. Accessed 05 May 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.2621.
   Google Scholar
• Konstantoni, K., and A. Emejulu. 2017. “When Intersectionality Met Childhood Studies: The Dilemmas of a Travelling Concept.” Children's Geographies 15 (1): 6–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1249824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, L., and L. Møller Haase. 2019. “The Shortcomings of Design Thinking When Compared to Designerly Thinking.” The Design Journal 22 (6): 813–832. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1652531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, J., and H. M. La. 2017. “A Comprehensive Review of Smart Wheelchairs: Past, Present and Future.” In IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 47 (4): 486–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2017.2706727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwen, J., D. Rijken, L. Bloothoofd, and E. Cobussen. 2020. “Finding New Perspectives through Theme Investigation.” The Design Journal 23 (3): 441–461. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1744258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, Y., J. Giacomin, and F. Nickpour. 2021. “What is Psychosocially Inclusive Design? A Definition with Constructs.” The Design Journal 24 (1): 5–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2020.1849964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, R., and G. Paleg. 2014. “Practice Considerations for the Introduction and Use of Power Mobility for Children.” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 56 (3): 210–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, A., J. Ryu, S. Agrawal, and J., C. Galloway. 2009. “Power Mobility Training for a 7-Month-Old Infant with Spina Bifida.” Pediatric Physical Therapy: The Official Publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association 21 (4): 362–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181bfae4c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. 1997. Influence and Autonomy in Psychoanalysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nessler, D. 2016. “How to Apply a Design Thinking, HCD, UX or Any Creative Process from Scratch”. Accessed 11 May 2020. https://medium.com/digital-experience-design/how-to-apply-a-design-thinking-hcd-ux-or-any-creative-process-from-scratch-b8786efbf812
   Google Scholar
• Newell, A., and P. Gregor. 1997. “Human Computer Interfaces for People with Disabilities.” In Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, edited by M.G. Helander, T.K. Landauer and P.V. Prabhu, 2nd ed., 813–824. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Nickpour, F., and C. O'Sullivan. 2016. “Designing an Innovative Walking Aid Kit; a Case Study of Design in Inclusive Healthcare Products.” In Designing around People, edited by Langdon P., Lazar J., Heylighen A., and Dong H. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, L., M. Eklund, P. Nyberg, and H. Thulesius. 2011. “Driving to Learn in a Powered Wheelchair: The Process of Learning Joystick Use in People with Profound Cognitive Disabilities.” The American Journal of Occupational Therapy : Official Publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association 65 (6): 652–660. doi:https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2011.001750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2010. “Why Design Contests Are Bad” Accessed 03 May 2020. https://www.core77.com/posts/17024/Why-Design-Contests-Are-Bad
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, C., and F. Nickpour. 2020a. “Mapping 50 Years of Design for Childhood Mobility.” Mendeley Data, V1, Accessed 19 May 2020. doi:https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17632/sfwzw25tjn.1.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, C., and F. Nickpour. 2020b. “50 Years of Inclusive Design for Childhood Mobility; Insights from an Illustrative Mapping Review.” In Synergy - DRS International Conference, edited by S. Boess, M. Cheung, and R. Cain, 11-14 August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan, C., and F. Nickpour. 2020c. “Drivers for Change: Initial Insights from Mapping Half a Century of Inclusive Paediatric Mobility Design.” In Advances in Usability, User Experience, Wearable and Assistive Technology, edited by T. Ahram, C. Falcão, Vol 1217. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Oxman, R. 1999. “Educating the Designerly Thinker.” Design Studies 20 (2): 105–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00029-5.
   Google Scholar
• Özkil, A., G. 2017. “Collective Design in 3D Printing: A Large Scale Empirical Study of Designs, Designers and Evolution.” Design Studies 51: 66–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pituch, E., P. W. Rushton, M. Ngo, J. Heales, and A. Poulin Arguin. 2019. “Powerful or Powerless? Children's, Parents', and Occupational Therapists' Perceptions of Powered Mobility.” Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics 39 (3): 276–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2018.1496964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D.,A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Self, J., H. Dalke, and M. Evans. 2013. “Designerly Ways of Knowing and Doing: Design Embodiment and Experiential Design Knowledge”. DRS EKSIG 2013: Knowing Inside Out - Experiential Knowledge, Expertise and Connoisseurship.
   Google Scholar
• Shew, A. 2018. “Different Ways of Moving through the World: How Does Technology Fail Disabled Bodies?” Logic Magazine 5: 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, M., C. 2010. “Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics as the Original Locus for the Septem Circumstantiae.” Classical Philology 105 (3): 236–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/656196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2003. Modern Social Imaginaries.Durham, USA: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tenenberg, J., D. Socha, and W. Roth. 2014. “Designerly Ways of Being.” DTRS 10: Design Thinking Research Symposium 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tonkinwise, C. 2015. “Design for Transitions ‒ from and to What?” Design Philosophy Papers 13 (1): 85–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14487136.2015.1085686.
   Google Scholar
• Venditti, S., F. Piredda, and W. Mattana. 2017. “Micronarratives as the Form of Contemporary Communication.” The Design Journal 20 (sup1): S273–S282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart, L., and J. Darrah. 2002. “Changing Philosophical Perspectives on the Management of Children with Physical Disabilities-Their Effect on the Use of Powered Mobility.” Disability and Rehabilitation 24 (9): 492–498. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110105240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wobbrock, J., and J. Kientz. 2016. “Research Contribution Types in Human-Computer Interaction.” Interactions 23 (3): 38–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2907069.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, W., and D. Radcliffe. 2000. “The Tacit Nature of Design Knowledge.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 12 (4): 493–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/713698497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar