Systematic literature review of legal design: Concepts, processes, and methods

References

• Andersen, C. B. 2021. “Musings on the Comic Book Contract Project and Legal Design Thinking.” Journal of Graphic Novels and Comics 12 (1): 39–45. doi:10.1080/21504857.2020.1731563
   Google Scholar
• Bason, C. 2014. Design for Policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger-Walliser, G., T. D. Barton, and H. Haapio. 2017. “From Visualization to Legal Design: A Collaborative and Creative Process.” American Business Law Journal 54 (2): 347–392. doi:10.1111/ablj.12101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borja de Mozota, B, and S. Valade-Amland. 2021. Design: A Business Case. New York: Business Expert Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borja de Mozota, B, and F. Wolff. 2019. “Forty Years of Research in Design Management: A Review of Literature and Directions for the Future.” Strategic Design Research Journal 12 (1): 4–26. doi:10.4013/sdrj.2019.121.02
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. 2008. “Design Thinking.” Harvard Business Review 86 (6): 84–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunschwig, C. R. 2002. “Legal Design and e-Government: Visualisations of Cost & Efficiency Accounting in the Wif! e-Learning Environment of the Canton of Zurich (Switzerland).” In 1st International Conference on Electronic Government, EGOV 2002, 2456: 430–437. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46138-8_70
   Google Scholar
• Brunschwig, C. R. 2001. Visualisierung Von Rechtsnormen: legal Design. Zürich: Schulthess.
   Google Scholar
• Brunschwig, C. R. 2021. “Visual Law and Legal Design: Questions and Tentative Answers.” Jusletter IT 27: 179–230. doi:10.38023/8b70bb88-de0c-4034-a54c-68409bb9549e
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 2015. “Worlds in the Making: Design, Management, and the Reform of Organizational Culture.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 1 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1016/j.sheji.2015.09.003
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, R., S. Junginger, and T. Lockwood. 2011. The Handbook of Design Management. Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Corrales, M., M. Fenwick, and H. Haapio. 2019. “Digital Technologies, Legal Design and the Future of the Legal Profession.” In Legal Tech, Smart Contracts and Blockchain. Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation. Springer: Singapore: 1–15. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6086-2_1
   Google Scholar
• Danish Design Centre 2003. The Economic Effects of Design. Copenhagen: Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council. 2007. Eleven Lessons: managing Design in Eleven Global Companies. London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, P. S., R. S. Atkin, and F. D. Schoorman. 1983. “On the Demise of Organizational Effectiveness Studies.” In Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of Multiple Models. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haapio, H., M. Hagan, M. Palmirani, and A. Rossi. 2018. “Legal Design Patterns for Privacy.” In Data Protection/LegalTech Proceedings of the 21st International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS: 445–450.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. 2019. “Participatory Design for Innovation in Access to Justice.” Daedalus 148 (1): 120–127. doi:10.1162/daed_a_00544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. 2020a. “Design Comes to the Law School.” In Modernising Legal Education. New York: Cambridge University Press: 109–125. doi:10.1017/9781108663311.008
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. 2020b. “Legal Design as a Thing: A Theory of Change and a Set of Methods to Craft a Human-Centered Legal System.” Design Issues 36 (3): 3–15. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, M. 2021. ““Prototyping for Policy.” Chap. 2.” In Legal Design: Integrating Business, Design and Legal Thinking with Technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Hagan, M, and F. K. Ozenc. 2020. “A Design Space for Legal and Systems Capability: Interfaces for Self-Help in Complex Systems.” Design Issues 36 (3): 61–81. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEO 2008. “Design thinking.” Accessed December 14, 2021. https://designthinking.ideo.com.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, D., M. Kim, and J. R. Sievert. 2020. “The Rapid Embrace of Legal Design and the Use of co-Design to Avoid Enshrining Systemic Bias.” Design Issues 36 (3): 16–30. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, L. N, and L. M. Haase. 2019. “The Shortcomings of Design Thinking When Compared to Designerly Thinking.” The Design Journal 22 (6): 813–832. doi:10.1080/14606925.2019.1652531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKim, R. H. 1972. Experiences in Visual Thinking. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, M. A. 2020. “The Escambia Project: An Experiment in Community-Led Legal Design.” Design Issues 36 (3): 45–60. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair, U. K, and A. Tandon. 2015. “Boundary Objects and End User Engagement: Illustrations from the Social Enterprise Domain.” In Boundary Spanning Elements and the Marketing Function in Organizations: Concepts and Empirical Studies. Springer: Cham: 137–159. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13440-6_9
   Google Scholar
• Palmirani, M., A. Rossi, M. Martoni, and M. Hagan. 2018. “A Methodological Framework to Design a Machine-Readable Privacy Icon Set.” In Data Protection/LegalTech Proceedings of the 21st International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS, Salzburg, Austria, February 14, edited by E. Schweighofer, 1–4. https://orbilu.uni.lu/handle/10993/37299
   Google Scholar
• Perry‐Kessaris, A. 2019. “Legal Design for Practice, Activism, Policy, and Research.” Journal of Law and Society 46 (2): 185–210. doi:10.1111/jols.12154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petticrew, M, and H. Roberts. 2006. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Plattner, H., C. Meinel, and L. Leifer. 2010. Design Thinking: understand–Improve–Apply. Springer: Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, G. 2020. “Airlines, Mayonnaise, and Justice: Reflections on the Theory and Practice of Legal Design and Technology.” Design Issues 36 (3): 31–44. doi:10.1162/desi_a_00602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, A., R. Ducato, H. Haapio, S. Passera, and M. Palmirani. 2019. “Legal Design Patterns: Towards a New Language for Legal Information Design” in Internet of Things.” Proceedings of the 22nd International Legal Infomatics Symposium IRIS: 517–526.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A, and H. Haapio. 2019. “Proactive Legal Design: Embedding Values in the Design of Legal Artefacts.” In Internet of Things. Proceedings of the 22nd International Legal Infomatics Symposium IRIS: 537–544.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, A, and M. Palmirani. 2015. “From Words to Images through Legal Visualization.” In AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems. Springer: Cham: 72–85. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00178-0_5
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón-Manzano, E. 2021. “Legaltech and Lawtech: Global Perspectives, Challenges, and Opportunities.” Laws 10 (2): 24–29. doi:10.3390/laws10020024
   Google Scholar
• Schoormann, T., R. Knackstedt, and H. Haapio. 2017. “Modeling and Visualization in Law: Past, Present and Future.” In Proceedings of the International Legal Informatics Symposium IRIS: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Solarte-Vasquez, M. C, and P. Hietanen-Kunwald. 2020. “Transaction Design Standards for the Operationalisation of Fairness and Empowerment in Proactive Contracting.” International and Comparative Law Review 20 (1): 180–200. doi:10.2478/iclr-2020-0008
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L, and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo, M. 2010. “Design Thinking in Legal Practice Management.” Design Management Review 21 (3): 44–46. doi:10.1111/j.1948-7169.2010.00078.x
   Google Scholar
• Toohey, L., M. Moore, K. Dart, and D. Toohey. 2019. “Meeting the Access to Civil Justice Challenge: Digital Inclusion, Algorithmic Justice, and Human-Centred Design.” Macquarie Law Journal 19: 133–156. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3438538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar