Co-design for active aging: An approach to stimulating creativity of the young elderly in urban China

References

• Action 2012. "5% Design Action - The Four Stages of the Social Design Process [5% Design Action-社会设计四大步骤执行流程]." 5% Design Action Social Design Platform. Accessed October 31, 2023. https://5percent-design-action.com/about.php
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., L. Coenen, and J. Vang. 2007. “Face-to-Face, Buzz, and Knowledge Bases: Sociospatial Implications for Learning.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25 (5): 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchley, R. C. 1985. Social Forces and Aging. California, USA: Wadsworth Pub. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., and A. Ståhlbrost. 2008. “Participatory Design: One Step Back or Two Steps Forward?.” In Proceedings of the Tenth Anniversary Conference on Participatory Design, 102–111. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University. https://doi.org/10.1145/179523
   Google Scholar
• Bertelsen, O. W., and S. Bødker. 2003. “Activity Theory.” In HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward a Multidisciplinary Science, edited by John M. Carroll, 291–324. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, M. 2002. “The Role of the Artefact in Art and Design Research.” International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology 10 (2): 19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Botero, A., and S. Hyysalo. 2013. “Ageing Together: Steps towards Evolutionary Co-Design in Everyday Practices.” CoDesign 9 (1): 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2012.760608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., and J. Wyatt. 2010. “Design Thinking for Social Innovation.” Stanford Social Innovation Review 8: 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29
   Google Scholar
• Chavalkul, Y., A. Saxon, and R. N. Jerrard. 2011. “Combining 2D and 3D Design for Novel Packaging for Older People.” International Journal of Design 5: 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottam, H., and C. Leadbeater. 2004. RED Paper 01: Health: Co-Creating Services. London: Design Council.
   Google Scholar
• Cozza, M., L. Tonolli, and V. D'Andrea. 2016. “Subversive Participatory Design: Reflections on a Case Study.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Interactive Exhibitions, Workshops-Volume 2, 53–56. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2948076.2948085
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 1982. “Designerly Ways of Knowing.” Design Studies 3 (4): 221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0
   Google Scholar
• Cross, N. 2001. “Designerly Ways of Knowing: Design Discipline versus Design Science.” Design Issues 17 (3): 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793601750357196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Alencar, E. M. L. S., and M. F. De Bruno-Faria. 1997. “Characteristics of on Organizational Environment Which Stimulate and Inhibit Creativity.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 31 (4): 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00799.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Y., H. Weng, H. Dong, and L. Liu. 2020. “Design as Mediation for Social Connection against Loneliness of Older People.” In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 41–52. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Drain, A., and E. B. N. Sanders. 2019. “A Collaboration System Model for Planning and Evaluating Participatory Design Projects.” International Journal of Design 13 (3): 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, C. 2019. "The Double Diamond: 15 Years on." Design Council. Accessed September 3 2022. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/newsopinion/doublediam-ond-15-years.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. 2010. “Researcher Practice: Embedding Creative Practice within Doctoral Research in Industrial Design.” Journal of Research Practice 6 (2): M16.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, D. 2012. “Research on the Innovative Design of Handicrafts in Qiaoniang Studio [巧娘工作室背景下的手工艺品创新设计研究.”., ]M.A. thesis., Tsinghua University.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2008. “Don Tapscott & Anthony D. Williams: Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything.” International Journal of Communication 2: 11.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-de-Heredia, A., D. Justel, I. Iriarte, A. Beitia, and J. Hernandez-Galan. 2019. “Analysis of the Pilot Survey INKLUGI about Aging and Disabilities to Promote Inclusive Design in Industry.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, Z. 2018. “Research on Aging Issues [老龄化问题应对研究].”.,." PhD diss., Central Party School of the Communist Party of China[中共中央党校].
   Google Scholar
• Herstatt, C., and B. Verworn. 2004. The ‘Fuzzy Front End’of Innovation. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., K. Dreessen, and B. Hagenaars. 2018. “Building Capabilities through Democratic Dialogues.” Design Issues 34 (4): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., N. Hendriks, S. L. Yndigegn, and L. Malmborg. 2018. “Scripting: An Exploration of Designing for Participation over Time with Communities.” CoDesign 14 (1): 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1424205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S. G., and T. Bratteteig. 2016. “Designing for Prolonged Mastery. On Involving Old People in Participatory Design.” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems 28 (1): 1.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsen, J. T., K. Græe, and M. J. Massaoud. 2008. “Building Trust in Project‐Stakeholder Relationships.” Baltic Journal of Management 3 (1): 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465260810844239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, T. W., and T. Robertson. 2016. “Voicing Values: Laying Foundations for Ageing People to Participate in Design.” In Proceedings of the 14th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers-Volume 1, 31–40. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2940299.2940301
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. 2015. “The ‘Rise’ of ‘Chinese Aunts’: An Inevitable Historical Phenomenon——Based on the Data Analysis of the Three Surveys of Women’s Social Status in Shanghai [“中国大妈”的“崛起”:一个必然的历史现象——基于三期上海妇女社会地位调查的数据分析].” New Normal and Grand Strategy——Collected Papers of the 13th Annual Academic Conference of Shanghai Social Sciences 2015: 16.
   Google Scholar
• Luck, R. 2018. “What is It That Makes Participation in Design Participatory Design?” Design Studies 59: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkelä, M. 2007. “Knowing through Making: The Role of the Artefact in Practice-Led Research.” Knowledge, Technology & Policy 20 (3): 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12130-007-9028-2
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2011. “The New Way of the Future: Small, Local, Open and Connected.” Social Space, 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs. Cambridge, USA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy, J. M., and G. W. Evans. 2002. “The Potential Role of the Physical Environment in Fostering Creativity.” Creativity Research Journal 14 (3-4): 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326934CRJ1434_11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, H. R., and J. R. Sasser. 2020. Aging: Concepts and Controversies. California, USA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mui, A. C. 1996. “Depression among Elderly Chinese Immigrants: An Exploratory Study.” Social Work 41 (6): 633–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G. 2006. “The Process of Social Innovation.” Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 1 (2): 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.2.145
   Google Scholar
• Mulgan, G., S. Tucker, R. Ali, and B. Sanders. 2007. Social Innovation: What it is, Why it Matters and How it can be Accelerated.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, R., J. Caulier-Grice, and G. Mulgan. 2010. The Open Book of Social Innovation. Vol. 24. London: Nesta.
   Google Scholar
• National Bureau of Statistics of Database 2010. Summary Data of the Sixth National Census. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/pcsj/rkpc/6rp/indexch.htm
   Google Scholar
• Nesta and IDEO. 2017. “Designing for Public Services: A Practical Guide.” Design for Europe. Accessed 18: 2019. http://designforeurop-e.eu/newsopinion/designing-public-services-practical-guide-nesta-ideo
   Google Scholar
• Pirinen, A. 2016. “The Barriers and Enablers of Co-Design for Services.” International Journal of Design 10 (3): 27–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, S. D., and F. B. De Waal. 2002. “Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases.” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly 2010. Participatory Case Study.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M., and A. Carmichael. 2013. “Factors Facilitating or Impeding Older Adults’ Creative Contributions in the Collaborative Design of a Novel DTV-Based Application.” Universal Access in the Information Society 12 (1): 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-011-0262-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righi, V., S. Sayago, A. Rosales, S. M. Ferreira, and J. Blat. 2018. “Co-Designing with a Community of Older Learners for over 10 Years by Moving User-Driven Participation from the Margin to the Centre.” CoDesign 14 (1): 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1424206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2008. “Co-Creation and the New Landscapes of Design.” CoDesign 4 (1): 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875068
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., and P. J. Stappers. 2014. “Probes, Toolkits and Prototypes: Three Approaches to Making in Codesigning.” CoDesign 10 (1): 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.888183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, E. B. N., E. Brandt, and T. Binder. 2010. “A Framework for Organizing the Tools and Techniques of Participatory Design.” In Proceedings of the 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference: 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1900441.1900476
   Google Scholar
• Schepers, P., and P. T. Van Den Berg. 2007. “Social Factors of Work-Environment Creativity.” Journal of Business and Psychology 21 (3): 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-006-9035-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Setiawan, A., N. Dunn, and L. Cruickshank. 2019. “Geographical Context Influence on Co-Design Practice between Indonesia and the UK Context.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 763–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H. D., and B. L. Grabowski. 2006. “Stimulating Intrinsic Motivation for Problem Solving Using Goal-Oriented Contexts and Peer Group Composition.” Educational Technology Research and Development 54 (5): 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-0128-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabó, K., and Á. Négyesi. 2005. “The Spread of Contingent Work in the Knowledge-Based Economy.” Human Resource Development Review 4 (1): 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484304274073
   Google Scholar
• Uzor, S., L. Baillie, and D. Skelton. 2012. “Senior Designers: Empowering Seniors to Design Enjoyable Falls Rehabilitation Tools.” In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 1179–88. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208568
   Google Scholar
• Veselova, E., and А. İ. Gaziulusoy. 2019. “Implications of the Bioinclusive Ethic on Collaborative and Participatory Design.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 1571–1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1594992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, D., H. Wei-An, C. Shu-Yi, and H. H. Tang. 2022. “The Complexities of Transport Service Design for Visually Impaired People: Lessons from a Bus Commuting Service.” International Journal of Design 16 (1): 55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, T., D. Xiao, Y. Dong, and R. H. Goossens. 2021. “Development of a Design Strategy for Playful Products of Older Adults.” The Design Journal 24 (4): 525–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2021.1912903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., N. Bryan-Kinns, and T. Ji. 2016. “Using Community Engagement to Drive Co-Creation in Rural China.” International Journal of Design 10: 37–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C. F., and T. J. Sung. 2016. “Service Design for Social Innovation through Participatory Action Research.” International Journal of Design 10 (1): 21–36.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. 2014. “Innovative Application of Handicraft Art of Rural Qiaoniang Studios in Furniture Industry [农村巧娘工作室手编工艺在家具产业中的创新应用].” M.A. thesis., Tsinghua University.
   Google Scholar
• Yūsuke, K. 2013. The Essence of Social Design. Tokyo, Japan: Eiji Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zitkus, E., and C. Libanio. 2019. “User Experience of Brazilian Public Healthcare System. A Case Study on the Accessibility of the Information Provided.” The Design Journal 22 (sup1): 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar