Different narratives, one area without internal frontiers: why EU institutions cannot agree on the refugee crisis

References

• Acosta, D. (2009). The good, the bad and the ugly in EU migration law: Is the European Parliament becoming bad and ugly? (The adoption of directive 2008/15: The returns directive). European Journal of Migration and Law, 11(1), 19–39. doi: 10.1163/157181609X410575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ad Hoc Group Immigration. (1992a). EURODAC: Progress report to ministers by the ad hoc group on immigration, 16 November 1992 (No. SN 4683/92 WGI 1271).
   Google Scholar
• Ad Hoc Group Immigration. (1992b). Recommendation regarding practices followed by Member States on expulsion, 16 November 1992 (No. SN 4678/92 WGI 1266).
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., Boer, M. D., Cullen, P., Gilmore, W., Raab, C., & Walker, N. (1995). Policing the European Union: Theory, law and practice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Argomaniz, J. (2009). Post-9/11 institutionalization of European Union counter-terrorism: Emergence, acceleration and inertia. European Security, 18(2), 151–172. doi: 10.1080/09662830903460103
   Google Scholar
• Bache, I., George, S., & Bulmer, S. (2011). Politics in the European Union (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bocquillon, P., & Dobbels, M. (2014). An elephant on the 13th floor of the Berlaymont? European Council and commission relations in legislative agenda setting. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 20–38. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C., Geddes, A., & Scholten, P. (2011). The role of narratives in migration policy-making: A research framework. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 13(1), 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, S., Hernanz, N., & Parkin, J. (2013). The ‘Lisbonization’ of the European Parliament: Assessing progress, shortcomings and challenges for democratic accountability in the area of freedom, security and justice. CEPS Paper on Liberty and Security in Europe, (58). Retrieved from: https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/LSE%20No%2058%20Lisbonisation%20of%20EP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, R. (1998). The European Parliament’s role in closer EU integration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• De Capitani, E. (2010). The evolving role of the European Parliament in the AFSJ. In J. Monar (Ed.), The institutional dimension of the European Union’s area of freedom, security, and justice (pp. 113–144). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• De Lobkowicz, W. (2002). L’Europe et la sécurité intérieure. Une élaboration par étapes [Europe and internal security. An elaboration in stages]. Paris: La Documentation Française.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esders, E. (1995). The European Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties and Internal Affairs – the committee responsible for justice and home affairs. In R. Bieber & J. Monar (Eds.), Justice and home affairs in the European Union: The development of the third pillar (pp. 259–275). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ette, A., Parkes, R., & Bendel, P. (2011). The diversity of European justice and home affairs cooperation: A model-testing exercise on its development and outcomes. In P. Bendel, A. Ette, R. Parkes, & M. Haase (Eds.), The Europeanization of control: Venues and outcomes of EU justice and home affairs cooperation (pp. 9–38). Münster: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1985, June 14). Completing the internal market. White Paper from the Commission to the European Council. COM (85) 310 final. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/1113/1/internal_market_wp_COM_85_310.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1988a, July 7). A people’s Europe. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament. COM (88) 331 final. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/3831/1/3831.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1988b, December 7). Communication of the Commission to the Council on the abolition of controls of persons at intra-Community borders. COM (88) 640 final. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/3807/1/3807.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2014, January 15). Press release – European Commission upholds free movement of people (MEMO/14/9). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-9_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016a, January 4). Full list of member states’ notifications of the temporary reintroduction of border control at internal borders pursuant to article 23 et seq. of the schengen borders code. Retrieved January 6, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/reintroduction-border-control/docs/ms_notifications_-_reintroduction_of_border_control_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016b, September 28). Press release – Delivering on migration and border management: Commission reports on progress made under the European Agenda on Migration (IP/16/3183). Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-3183_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (n.d.). Directorate-general migration and home affairs: Schengen, borders & visas – Schengen Area. Retrieved September 21, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/borders-and-visas/schengen/index_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1984). Conclusions of the European Council. Fontainebleau, 25–26 June 1984. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/1448/1/Fountainebleau__june_1994.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (1985). Conclusions of the European Council. Milan, 28–29 June 1985. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/1421/1/Milan_June_1995.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (1990, December 14). Oral question (0-0388/90) by Mrs Roth, Mrs Tazdait, Mr Taradash, Mrs Aglietta and Mr Melandri, on behalf of the Green Group to the Council. European Parliament Session Documents, 83-1852/90/rev. Retrieved from http://aei.pitt.edu/48230/1/A9487.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (1991a, October 14). Resolution on the free movement of persons and security in the European Community (OJ C 267/197). Luxembourg: European Parliament Historical Archives.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (1991b, December 11). Minutes of the committee in legal affairs and citizens’ rights (PE/VII/PV/20). Luxembourg: European Parliament Historical Archives.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (1992, January 16). Decision on the number and membership of parliamentary committees (B3-0036/92). Luxembourg: European Parliament Historical Archives.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2008). The European Parliament as a champion of European values. Brussels: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2015, September 10). European Parliament resolution of 10 September 2015 on migration and refugees in Europe. 2015/2833(RSP). Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+MOTION+B8-2015-0837+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (n.d.). Civil liberties, justice and home affairs – welcome words. Retrieved March 10, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/libe/home.html
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). Editors’ introduction. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 1–17). London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A. (2007). The politics of EU domestic order. In K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), Handbook of European Union politics (pp. 449–462). London, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ghimis, A. (2015, September 22). The refugee crisis: Schengen’s slippery slope. European Policy Centre. Retrieved from http://www.epc.eu/pub_details?cat_id=4&pub_id=5963
   Google Scholar
• Group of Coordinators ‘Free Movement of People’. (1993). Work program of the Belgian presidency (No. CIRC 3653/93). Retrieved from http://www.statewatch.org/semdoc/assets/files/keytexts/ktch1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guiraudon, V. (2003). The constitution of a European immigration policy domain: A political sociology approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(2), 263–282. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000059035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1999). The European nation-state and the pressures of globalization. New Left Review, I(235), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2006). The politics of insecurity: Fear, migration, and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010). A narrative policy framework: Clear enough to be wrong? Policy Studies Journal, 38(2), 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., & Radaelli, C. M. (2015). The narrative policy framework: Child or monster? Critical Policy Studies, 9(3), 339–355. doi:10.1080/19460171.2015.1053959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2015, September 9). State of the Union by Jean-Claude Juncker, President of the European Commission. European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/priorities/soteu/docs/state_of_the_union_2015_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Justice and Home Affairs Council. (2016). Highlights of the Justice and Home Affairs (Home Affairs) on 13 October 2016 in Luxembourg. Retrieved June 2, 2015, from http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/jha/2016/10/13-14/
   Google Scholar
• Karnitschnig, M. (2015, August 31). Merkel warns Schengen could be at risk. POLITICO. Retrieved from http://www.politico.eu/article/merkel-warns-schengen-at-risk-germany-refugees-migration-quotas-travel/
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. (2009). Liberty versus security? EU asylum policy and the European Commission. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 5(2), 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsley, P. (2016, September 2). The death of Alan Kurdi: One year on, compassion towards refugees fades. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/01/alan-kurdi-death-one-year-on-compassion-towards-refugees-fades
   Google Scholar
• Kirby, E. J. (2016, October 7). Compassion fatigue and the optician of Lampedusa. BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37485824
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. (2004). The European Union and its institutions as ‘identity builders’. In R. K. Herrmann, T. Risse-Kappen, & M. B. Brewer (Eds.), Transnational identities: Becoming European in the EU (pp. 75–96). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lahav, G. (2003). Immigration and politics in the new Europe: Reinventing borders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2001). The Europeanization of refugee policies: Normative challenges and institutional legacies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(5), 851–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehne, S. (2016, February 4). How the refugee crisis will reshape the EU. Carnegie Europe. Retrieved from http://carnegieeurope.eu/2016/02/04/how-refugee-crisis-will-reshape-eu/itj7
   Google Scholar
• Léonard, S. (2007). The ‘securitization’ of asylum and migration in the European Union: Beyond the Copenhagen school’s framework. In Paper presented at the SGIR Sixth Pan-European International Relations Conference, 12–15 September 2007, Turin. Retrieved from http://www.jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/239
   Google Scholar
• Maricut, A. (2016). With and without supranationalisation: The post-Lisbon roles of the European Council and the Council in justice and home affairs governance. Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 541–555. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1178253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, R. E. (1978). The origin and meaning of miles’ law. Public Administration Review, 38(5), 399–403. doi:10.2307/975497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitterrand, F. (1984). Speech by François Mitterrand to the European Parliament (24 May 1984). Retrieved from http://www.cvce.eu/content/publication/2001/10/19/cdd42d22-fe8e-41bb-bfb7-9b655113ebcf/publishable_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (1994). The evolving role of the Union institutions in the framework of the third pillar. In J. Monar & R. Morgan (Eds.), The third pillar of the European Union: Co-operation in the fields of justice and home affairs (pp. 69–83). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemann, A. (2012). The dynamics of EU migration Policy: From Maastricht to Lisbon. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Constructing a policy-making state? Policy dynamics in the EU (pp. 209–232). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeier, M. (1995). The K.4 committee and its position in the decision-making process. In R. Bieber & J. Monar (Eds.), Justice and home affairs in the European Union: The development of the third pillar (pp. 321–331). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, H. G., & Siegl, J. (2010). The Council in the area of freedom, security and justice. In J. Monar (Ed.), The institutional dimension of the European Union’s area of freedom, security, and justice (pp. 53–82). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Palmeri, T. (2015, August 24). Europe stands by Schengen. Politico Europe. Retrieved from http://www.politico.eu/article/europe-stands-by-schengen-free-movement-thalys-attack-border-control/
   Google Scholar
• Papagianni, G. (2006). Institutional and policy dynamics of EU migration law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Peers, S. (2011). EU justice and home affairs law (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163. doi:10.1177/0010414096029002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riessman, C. K. (2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• van de Rijt, W. (1997). Schengen et les pays nordiques: Aperçu de la situation actuelle [Schengen and the Nordic countries: Overview of current situation]. In M. den Boer (Ed.), Schengen, judicial cooperation and policy coordination (pp. 29–37). Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., & Trauner, F. (2014). Do supranational EU institutions make a difference? EU asylum law before and after ‘communitarization’. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(8), 1142–1162. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.906905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, E. (1994). Narrative policy analysis: Theory and practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (2004). Neo-neofunctionalism. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (1st ed., pp. 46–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrag Sternberg, C. (2013). The struggle for EU legitimacy: Public contestation, 1950–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, M. (2015, September 11). Don’t blame Europe for the refugee crisis. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/dont-blame-europe-for-the-refugee-crisis/2015/09/11/e253c15a-573d-11e5-b8c9-944725fcd3b9_story.html
   Google Scholar
• Schutte, J. J. (1991). Schengen: Its meaning for the free movement of persons in Europe. Common Market Law Review, 28(3), 549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Selm-Thorburn, J. (1998). Refugee protection in Europe: lessons of the Yugoslav crisis. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton, M. (2012). The European Parliament. In J. Peterson & M. Shackleton (Eds.), The institutions of the European Union (3rd ed., pp. 124–246). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shooting Schengen. (2015, September 19). The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21665021-only-eu-wide-agreement-asylum-can-save-passport-free-travel-europe-shooting-schengen
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C. (1993). Inventing the ‘people’s Europe’: Critical approaches to European community ‘cultural policy’. Man, 28(4), 779–800. doi: 10.2307/2803997
   Google Scholar
• Shore, C., & Black, A. (1994). Citizens’ Europe and the construction of European identity. In V. A. Goddard, J. R. Llobera, & C. Shore (Eds.), The anthropology of Europe: Identity and boundaries in conflict (pp. 275–298). Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Smale, A. (2016, February 24). With E.U. paralyzed, 10 nations try to stem migrant flow. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/25/world/europe/refugees-migrants-austria-greece.html
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel Online. (2016, August 24). Two weeks in September: The makings of Merkel’s decision to accept refugees. Spiegel Online International. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/a-look-back-at-the-refugee-crisis-one-year-later-a-1107986.html
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (2011). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making (3rd ed.). New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, A. (1992, January 21). Letter to Martin Bangemann, Vice-President of the Commission of the European Commission on the occasion of the establishment of the LIBE Committee. Luxembourg: European Parliament Historical Archives.
   Google Scholar
• Ucarer, E. M. (2001). From the sidelines to center stage: Sidekick no more? The European Commission in justice and home affairs. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 5(5). Retrieved from http://eiop.or.at/eiop/pdf/2001-005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ucarer, E. M. (2013). The area of freedom, security, and justice. In M. Cini & N. Perez-Solorzano Borragan (Eds.), European Union politics (4th ed., pp. 281–295). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandystadt, N. (2012, May 14). Home affairs council: Schengen – ministers uncomfortable with Franco-German letter. Europolitics.
   Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. (1999). Whom to represent? Role orientations of legislators in Europe. In H. Schmitt, & J. Thomassen (Eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union (pp. 209–234). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, E. (1992). The Schengen agreement and its portent for the freedom of personal movement in Europe. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 6, 191–222.
   Google Scholar
• Zaiotti, R. (2011). Cultures of border control: Schengen and the evolution of European frontiers. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar