Assessing vocal performances using analytical assessment: a case study

References

• Bloxham, S., P. Boyd, and S. Orr. 2011. “Mark My Words: The Role of Assessment Criteria in UK Higher Education Grading Practices.” Studies in Higher Education 36 (6): 655–670. doi:10.1080/03075071003777716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. W., and D. Coimbra. 2001. “Investigating Performance Evaluation by Assessors of Singers in a Music College Setting.” Musicae Scientiae 5 (1): 33–53.
   Google Scholar
• Delandshere, G. 2001. “Implicit Theories, Unexamined Assumptions and the Status Quo of Educational Assessment.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 8 (2): 113–133. doi:10.1080/09695940123828.
   Google Scholar
• Fautley, M. 2010. Assessment in Music Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, R. 2008. Generelle karakterbeskrivelser for UH-sektoren [General Grade Descriptors for the Higher Education Sector]. Oslo: The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, R. 2009. Tilleggsrapport for arbeidsgruppe for å se nærmere på UH-sektorens generelle karakterbeskrivelser [Supplementary Report from a Working Group Examining General Grade Descriptors for the Higher Education Sector]. Oslo: The Norwegian Association of Higher Education Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzáles Arnal, S., and S. Burwood. 2003. “Tacit Knowledge and Public Accounts.” Journal of Philosophy of Education 37 (3): 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, P., K. Purnell, and R. Zipf. 2008. “Judging Quality through Substantive Conversations between Markers.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 33 (2): 133–142. doi:10.1080/02602930601125681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maugars, C. 2006. “Attitudes of Music Teachers towards Final Examinations in the French Music Conservatoires.” International Journal of Music Education 24 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1177/0255761406063106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. E., and E. Schubert. 2004. “Measuring Performance Enhancement in Music.” In Measuring Performance Enhancement in Music. Strategies and Techniques to Enhance Performance, edited by A. Williamon, 61–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Orr, S. 2007. “Assessment Moderation: Constructing the Marks and Constructing the Students.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 32 (6): 645–656. doi:10.1080/02602930601117068.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1958. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Rust, C., B. O'Donovan, and M. Price. 2005. “A Social Constructivist Assessment Process Model: How the Research Literature Shows Us This Could Be Best Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (3): 231–240. doi:10.1080/02602930500063819.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1987. “Specifying and Promulgating Achievement Standards.” Oxford Review of Education 13 (2): 191–209. doi:10.1080/0305498870130207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 1989. “Formative Assessment and the Design of Instructional Systems.” Instructional Science 18 (2): 119–144. doi:10.1007/BF00117714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2005. “Interpretations of Criteria-based Assessment and Grading in Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30 (2): 175–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009a. “Indeterminacy in the Use of Preset Criteria for Assessment and Grading.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 34 (2): 159–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. 2009b. “Transforming Holistic Assessment and Grading into a Vehicle for Complex Learning.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgment in Higher Education, edited by G. Joughin, 45–63. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Shay, S. 2005. “The Assessment of Complex Tasks: A Double Reading.” Studies in Higher Education 30 (6): 663–679. doi:10.1080/03075070500339988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., R. Sadler, and L. Davies. n.d. “Assessment Rubrics.” Accessed April 16, 2014. http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/245634/Issues-Paper-on-rubrics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stanley, M., R. Brooker, and R. Gilbert. 2002. “Examiner Perceptions of Using Criteria in Music Performance Assessment.” Research Studies in Music Education 18 (1): 46–56. doi:10.1177/1321103X020180010601.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, K. H. K., and M. Prosser. 2004. “Qualitatively Different Ways of Differentiating Student Achievement: A Phenomenographic Study of Academics’ Conceptions of Grade Descriptors.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (3): 267–282. doi:10.1080/0260293042000188230.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, S. A. M., and A. Williamon. 2003. “Evaluating Evaluation: Musical Performance Assessment as a Research Tool.” Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal 21 (1): 21–41. doi:10.1525/mp.2003.21.1.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wapnick, J., and E. Ekholm. 1997. “Expert Consensus in Solo Voice Performance Evaluation.” Journal of Voice 11 (4): 429–436. doi:10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80039-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 2000. “Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems.” Organization 7 (2): 225–246. doi:10.1177/135050840072002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolf, H. 2004. “Assessment Criteria: Reflections on Current Practices.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 29 (4): 479–493.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, W. J. 2005. “Improving Music Performance Assessment.” Doctor of Philosophy. Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber-Skerritt, O. 2002. “Action Learning, Action Research and Process Management (ALARPM): A Personal History.” The Learning Organization 9 (3): 102–113.
   Google Scholar