Dalcroze meets technology: integrating music, movement and visuals with the Music Paint Machine

References

• Addessi, A. R., and F. Pachet. 1999. “Experiments with a Musical Machine: Musical Style Replication in 3 to 5 Year Old Children.” British Journal of Music Education 22 (01): 21–46. doi:10.1017/S0265051704005972.
   Google Scholar
• Addessi, A. R., F. Pachet, and R. Caterina. 2004. “Children Confronting an Interactive Musical System.” Paper presented at the 8th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (ICMPC8), Adelaide, Australia, August 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bachman, M.-L. 1991. Dalcroze Today: An Education Through and into Music. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bartel, L., and L. Cameron. 2004. “From Dilemmas to Experience: Shaping the Conditions of Learning.” In Questioning the Music Education Paradigm, edited by L. Bartel, 39–62. Toronto: Canadian Music Educator’s Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, W. I. 2014. Music Learning Today: Digital Pedagogy for Creating, Performing, and Responding to Music. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckstead, D. 2001. “Will Technology Transform Music Education?.” Music Educators Journal 87 (6): 44–49. doi:10.2307/3399692.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, D. 2008. “Do You Hear What I Hear? Musical Maps and Felt Pathways of Musical Understanding.” Visions of Research in Music Education 11: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. 2002. “Educating Musically.” In The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning, edited by R. Colwell and C. Richardson, 63–84. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowman, W. 2004. “Cognition and the Body: Perspectives from Music Education.” In Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Towards Embodied Teaching and Learning, edited by L. Bresler, 29–50. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Brandmeyer, A., D. Hoppe, M. Sadakata, R. Timmers, and P. Desain. 2006. “PracticeSpace: A Platform for Real-time Visual Feedback in Music Instruction.” Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Bologna, Italy, August 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bresler, L., ed. 2004. Knowing Bodies, Moving Minds: Towards Embodied Teaching and Learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brotz, T. 2015. “Dalcrozian Piano Pedagogy and Cognitive Motor Learning Theory.” American Dalcroze Journal 41 (3): 22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard, P. 2007. “Creativity and Technology: Critical Agents of Change in the Work and Lives of Music Teachers.” In Music Education with Digital Technology, edited by J. Finney and P. Burnard, 131–141. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., R. T. Wigand, and M. Nilan. 1999. “Optimal Experience of Web Activities.” Computers in Human Behavior 15 (5): 585–608. doi:10.1016/ S0747-5632(99)00038-2 doi: 10.1016/S0747-5632(99)00038-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H.-H., J. J. G. van Merriënboer, and F. Paas. 2014. “Effects of the Physical Environment on Cognitive Load and Learning: Towards a New Model of Cognitive Load.” Educational Psychology Review 26 (2): 225–244. doi:10.1007/s10648-014-9262-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1990. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Dalgleish, M., and S. Spencer. 2014. “Postrum: Developing Good Posture in Trumpet Players through Directional Haptic Feedback.” Paper presented at the 9th Conference on International Musicology (CIM14), Berlin, Germany, December 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J. W. 2012. “The Role of Bodily Movement in Learning and Performing Music.” In The Oxford Handbook of Music Education, edited by G. E. McPherson, and G. F. Welch, 1769–782. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Bruyckere, P., P. A. Kirschner, and C. D. Hulshof. 2016. “Technology in Education: What Teachers Should Know.” American Educator 40 (1): 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Deliège, I., and G. Wiggins. 2006. Musical Creativity: Multidisciplinary Research in Theory and Practice. New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doğantan-Dack, M. 2011. “In the Beginning Was Gesture: Piano Touch and the Phenomenology of the Performing Body.” In New Perspectives on Music and Gesture, edited by A. Gritten and E. King, 243–265. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Dorfman, J. 2013. Theory and Practice of Technology-Based Music Instruction. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dourish, P. 2004. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dubé, F., J. Kiss, and H. Bouldoire. 2015. “Gamification and Learner Engagement: A « Learning the Violin » Implementation Interface Example.” Paper presented at the LTM21 / AEM21 Conference, Montreal, Canada, November 5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, R. A., and D. L. Chapman. 2011. “Changing Learners: The Nature of Expertise in Music Teaching.” In Advances in Social-psychology and Music Education Research, edited by P. Madura Ward-Steinman, 29–38. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Sam. 2006. “Learning Musical Instrument Skills Through Interactive Sonification.” Paper presented at the 2006 conference on New interfaces for musical expression (NIME06), Paris, France, June 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fober, T., S. Letz, and Y. Orlarey. 2007. “VEMUS-Feedback and Groupware Technologies for Music Instrument Learning.” Paper presented at the 4th International Sound and Music Computing Conference, Lefkada, Greece, July 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Frego, R. J. D. 2009. “Plastique Animée: A Dance Genre and a Means to Artistry.” Le Rythme, 100th Anniversary Issue: 87–89.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2002. “Somatic Knowledge: The Body as Content and Methodology in Dance Education.” Journal of Dance Education 2 (4): 114–118. doi:10.1080/15290824.2002.10387219.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhead, K., and J. Habron. 2015. “The Touch of Sound: Dalcroze Eurhythmics as a Somatic Practice.” Journal of Dance & Somatic Practices 7 (1): 93–112. doi: 10.1386/jdsp.7.1.93_1
   Google Scholar
• Greenhead, K., J. Habron, and L. Mathieu. 2016. “Dalcroze Eurhythmics: Bridging the Gap Between the Academic and Practical Through Creative Teaching and Learning.” In Creative Teaching for Creative Learning in Higher Music Education, edited by E. Haddon and P. Burnard, 211–226. Oxford: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gruhn, W. 2002. “Phases and Stages in Early Music Learning. A Longitudinal Study on the Development of Young Children’s Musical Potential.” Music Education Research 4 (1): 51–71. doi:10.1080/14613800220119778.
   Google Scholar
• Habron, J., J. Jesuthasan, and C. Bourne. 2012. Moving into Composition – The Experiences of Student Composers During a Short Course of Dalcroze Eurhythmics. Coventry: Coventry University.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S. 2001. “Research and Development in Music Education.” In Issues in Music Teaching, edited by C. Philpott and C. Plummeridge, 238–251. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hennessy, S., K. Ruthven, and S. Brindley. 2005. “Teacher Perspectives on Integrating ICT into Subject Teaching: Commitment, Constraints, Caution, and Change.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 37 (2): 155–192. doi:10.1080/0022027032000276961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himonides, E., and R. Purves. 2010. “The Role of Technology.” In Music Education in the 21st Century in the United Kingdom: Achievements, Analysis and Aspirations, edited by S. Hallam and A. Creech, 29–50. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, D., M. Sadakata, and P. Desain. 2006. “Development of Real-time Visual Feedback Assistance in Singing Training: A Review.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 22 (4): 308–316. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00178.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., J. Brereton, G. Welch, E. Himonides, M. DeCosta, J. Williams, and A. Howard. 2007. “Are Real-time Displays of Benefit in the Singing Studio? An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Voice 21 (1): 20–34. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubrich, S. 2016. “The Performer’s Body in Creative Interpretations of Repertoire Music.” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 15 (3–4): 337–352. doi:10.1177/1474022216647711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwami, N., and M. Miura. 2007. “A Support System for Basic Practice of Playing the Drums.” Paper presented at the International Computer Music Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, August 27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jaques-Dalcroze, E. 2000. Rhythm, Music & Education. 5th ed. London: The Dalcroze Society.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, T. 2010. “Cognitive Load Theory, Educational Research, and Instructional Design: Some Food for Thought.” Instructional Science 38 (2): 105–134. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juntunen, M.-L. 2016. “The Dalcroze Approach: Experiencing and Knowing Music through Embodied Exploration.” In Approaches to Teaching General Music: Methods, Issues, and Viewpoints, edited by C. R. Abril and B. M. Gault, 141–167. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juntunen, M.-L., and H. Westerlund. 2001. “Digging Dalcroze, or, Dissolving the Mind-Body Dualism: Philosophical and Practical Remarks on the Musical Body in Action.” Music Education Research 3 (2): 203–214. doi:10.1177/1048371311428979 doi: 10.1080/14613800120089250
   Google Scholar
• Keller, P. 2014. “Ensemble Performance: Interpersonal Alignment of Musical Expression.” In Expressiveness in Music Performance: Empirical Approaches Across Styles and Cultures, edited by D. Fabian, R. Timmers, and E. Schubert, 260–282. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A. 2015. “Do We Need Teachers as Designers of Technology Enhanced Learning?.” Instructional Science 43 (2): 309–322. doi:10.1007/s11251-015-9346-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., J. Sweller, and R. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-based, Experiential and Inquiry-based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41: 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskela, T. 2015. “Choosing Juice: Enabling Fun in Games through Better Visual Design.” Unpublished Bachelor thesis, Tampere University of Applied Sciences, Tampere.
   Google Scholar
• Kratus, J. 1991. “Growing with Improvisation.” Music Educators Journal 78 (4): 35–40. doi:10.2307/3398335.
   Google Scholar
• Larkin, O., T. Koerselman, B. Ong, and K. Ng. 2008. “Sonification of Bowing Features for String Instrument Training.” Paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Auditory Display, Paris, France, June 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, A. C., J. A. Sloboda, and R. H. Woody. 2007. Psychology for Musicians: Understanding and Acquiring the Skills. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M. 2007. Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. London: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M., and L. Nijs. 2016. “Cognition and Technology for Instrumental Music Learning.” In The Routledge Companion to Music, Technology & Education, edited by A. King, E. Himonides, and A. Ruthman, 23–36. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ling Lo, M. 2012. Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Manifold, L. H. 2008. Applying Jaques-Dalcroze’s Method to Teaching Musical Instruments and Its Effect on the Learning Process. Accessed 31 July 2015. http://manifoldmelodies.com/docs/Manifold_Dalcroze_voice.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manzo, V. J. 2011. Max/MSP/Jitter for Music: A Practical Guide to Developing Interactive Music Systems for Education and More. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., and R. Moreno. 2003. “Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning.” Educational Psychologist 38 (1): 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., R. Moreno, M. Boire, and S. Vagge. 1999. “Maximizing Constructivist Learning from Multimedia Communications by Minimizing Cognitive Load.” Journal of Educational Psychology 91 (4): 638. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.4.638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. E., and A. Gabrielsson. 2002. “From Sound to Sign.” In The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning, edited by R. Parncutt and G. McPherson, 99–116. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, G. E., and J. M. Renwick. 2001. “A Longitudinal Study of Self-regulation in Children's Musical Practice.” Music Education Research 3 (2): 169–186. doi:10.1080/14613800120089232.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, V. H. 1994. Dalcroze Eurhythmics in Today’s Music Classroom. New York, NY: Schott Company.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, H. 2016. “Instrumental Teachers’ Instructional Strategies for Facilitating Children’s Learning of Expressive Music Performance: An Exploratory Study.” International Journal of Music Education. doi:10.1177/0255761415619390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nehaniv, C. L., and K. Dautenhahn, eds. 2007. Imitation and Social Learning in Robots, Humans and Animals: Behavioural, Social and Communicative Dimensions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, L. 2017. “The Merging of Musician and Musical Instrument: Incorporation, Presence and the Levels of Embodiment.” In The Routledge Companion to Embodied Music Interaction, edited by M. Lesaffre, P.-J. Maes, and M. Leman, 49–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, Luc, Pieter Coussement, Bart Moens, Denis Amelinck, Micheline Lesaffre, and Marc Leman. 2012. “Interacting with the Music Paint Machine: Relating the Constructs of Flow Experience and Presence.” Interacting with Computers 24: 237–250. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs, L., P. Coussement, C. Muller, M. Lesaffre, and M. Leman. 2010. “The Music Paint Machine. A Multimodal Interactive Platform to Stimulate Musical Creativity in Instrumental Practice.” Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Valencia, Spain, April 7–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, Luc, and Marc Leman. 2014. “Interactive Technologies in the Instrumental Music Classroom: A Longitudinal Study with the Music Paint Machine.” Computers & Education 73: 40–59. doi:10.1016/j.intcom.2012.05.002 doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijs, Luc, and Marc Leman. 2016. “Performing with the Music Paint Machine: Provoking an Embodied Approach to Educational Technology.” In Music, Technology & Education: Critical Perspectives, edited by Andrew King, and Evangelos Himonides, 225–242. London: Ashgate Psychology of Music Series.
   Google Scholar
• Nijs, L., M. Lesaffre, and M. Leman. 2013. “The Musical Instrument as a Natural Extension of the Musician.” In Music and Its Instruments, edited by M. Castellengo and H. Genevois, 467–484. Sampzon: Editions Delatour France.
   Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. 2001. “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6. doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, A., and J. Woollard. 2010. Psychology for the Classroom: Constructivism and Social Learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Repp, B. H., and Y.-H. Su. 2013. “Sensorimotor Synchronization: A Review of Recent Research (2006–2012).” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20 (3): 403–452. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronsse, R., V. Puttemans, J. P. Coxon, D. J. Goble, J. Wagemans, N. Wenderoth, and S. Swinnen. 2011. “Motor Learning with Augmented Feedback: Modality-Dependent Behavioral and Neural Consequences.” Cerebral Cortex 21 (6): 1283–1294. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runesson, U. 2006. “What Is It Possible to Learn? On Variation as a Necessary Condition for Learning.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 50 (4): 397–410. doi:10.1080/00313830600823753.
   Google Scholar
• Sadakata, M., D. Hoppe, A. Brandmeyer, R. Timmers, and P. Desain. 2008. “Real-time Visual Feedback for Learning to Perform Short Rhythms with Expressive Variations in Timing and Loudness.” Journal of New Music Research 37 (3): 207–220. doi:10.1080/09298210802322401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, J. 2009. “Pedagogical Strategies for Change.” In Music Education with Digital Technology, edited by J. Finney and P. Burnard, 142–155. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Schippers, H. 2006. “‘As If a Little Bird Is Sitting on Your Finger … ’: Metaphor as a Key Instrument in Training Professional Musicians.” International Journal of Music Education 24 (3): 209–217. doi:10.1177/0255761406069640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. 2008. “Principles of Practice for the Development of Skilled Actions: Implications for Training and Instruction in Music.” In Art in Motion. Musical and Athletic Motor Learning and Performance, edited by A. Mornell, 41–67. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Langer.
   Google Scholar
• Schnebly-Black, J., and S. Moore. 2003. The Rhythm Inside: Connecting Body, Mind, and Spirit through Music. Van Nuys, CA: Alfred Music.
   Google Scholar
• Schnebly-Black, J., and S. Moore. 2004. Rhythm: One on One: Dalcroze Activities in the Private Music Lesson. Van Nuys, CA: Alfred Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Schoonderwaldt, E., K. Falkenberg Hansen, and A. Askenfeld. 2004. “IMUTUS–An Interactive System for Learning to Play a Musical Instrument.” Paper presented at the International Conference of Interactive Computer Aided Learning, Villach, Austria, September 23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, F., and I. Newland. 2013. “The Musical Body - Devising a Choreo-musical Interpretation for the Work Tierkreis (1974–75) by Karlheinz Stockhausen.” In Nine Ways of Seeing a Body, edited by S. Reeve, 99–109. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shernoff, D. J., M. Csikszentmihalyi, B. Shneider, and E. S. Shernoff. 2003. “Student Engagement in High School Classrooms from the Perspective of Flow Theory.” School Psychology Quarterly 18 (2): 158–176. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.158.21860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., J. J. G. Van Merrienboer, and F. G. W. C. Paas. 1998. “Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design.” Educational Psychology Review 10 (3): 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, D. 1989. “Physical Movement and Memory for Music.” British Journal of Music Education 6 (3): 251–260. doi:10.1017/S026505170000721X.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, W. 2002. “Visual Feedback of Acoustic Voice Features in Singing Training.” Paper presented at the 9th Australian Speech Science & Technology Conference, Melbourne, Australia, December 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tsukerman, V. D. 2016. “The Neurodynamic Bases of Imitating Learning and Episodic Memory.” Biophysics 61 (2): 316–325. doi:10.1134/S0006350916020226.
   Google Scholar
• Upitis, R., J. Brook, and P. C. Abrami. 2014. “Enhancing Music Learning with Digital Tools: A Case Study of a Student Using iSCORE.” Journal of Literature and Art Studies 4 (6): 489–497. doi:10.17265/2159-5836/2014.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Urista, D. 2016. The Moving Body in the Aural Skills Classroom: A Eurhythmics Based Approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Beemt, A., S. Akkerman, and P. R. J. Simons. 2011. “Patterns of Interactive Media Use among Contemporary Youth.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27 (2): 103–118. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00384.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Linden, J., E. Schoonderwaldt, J. Bird, and R. Johnson. 2011. “Musicjacket: Combining Motion Capture and Vibrotactile Feedback to Teach Violin Bowing.” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60 (1): 104–113. doi:10.1109/TIM.2010.2065770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, L. 2015. “The First Experiences of Music Students with Dalcroze-inspired Activities: A Phenomenological Study.” Psychology of Music, 43 (3): 390–406. doi:10.1177/0305735613513485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and P. A. Kirschner. 2012. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D. P.-C. 2008. “The Quantifying Analysis of Effectiveness of Music Learning Through the Dalcroze Musical Method.” US-China Education Review 5: 32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Washburn, K. D. 2010. The Architecture of Learning. Designing Instruction for the Learning Brain. Pelham, AL: Clerestory Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wedin, E. 2015. Playing Music with the Whole Body. Eurhythmics and Motor Development. Stockholm, SE: Gehrmans Musikförlag.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, G. F., D. M. Howard, E. Himonides, and J. Brereton. 2005. “Real-Time Feedback in the Singing Studio: An Innovatory Action-Research Project Using New Voice Technology.” Music Education Research 7 (2): 225–249. doi:10.1080/14613800500169779.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, P. H., K. Lee, J. Callaghan, and W. Thorpe. 2008. “Learning to Sing in Tune: Does Real-time Visual Feedback Help?” Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies 2 (1–2): 157–152. doi:10.1007/s00426-010-0291-6.
   Google Scholar
• Wise, S., J. Greenwood, and N. Davis. 2011. “Teachers’ Use of Digital Technology in Secondary Music Education: Illustrations of Changing Classrooms.” British Journal of Music Education 28 (2): 117–134. doi:10.1017/S0265051711000039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, R. 2007. “Popular Music in School: Remixing the Issues.” Music Educators Journal 93 (4): 32–37. doi:10.1177/002743210709300415.
   Google Scholar
• Woszczynski, A., P. Roth, and A. Segars. 2002. “Exploring the Theoretical Foundations of Playfulness in Computer Interactions.” Computers in Human Behavior 18 (4): 369–388. doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(01)00058-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., and R. Lewthwaite. 2009. “Attentional and Motivational Influences on Motor Performance and Learning.” In Art in Motion: Musical and Athletic Motor Learning and Performance, edited by A. Mornell, 95–117. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, X., P. Puentes, E. Ackermann, and H. Ishii. 2016. “Andantino: Teaching Children Piano with Projected Animated Characters.” In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, edited by Janet Read and Phil Stenton, 37–45. New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Young, V., K. Burwell, and D. Pickup. 2003. “Areas of Study and Teaching Strategies Instrumental Teaching: A Case Study Research Project.” Music Education Research 5 (2): 139–155. doi:10.1080/1461380032000085522.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, P.-T., Y.-S. Lai, H.-H. Tsai, and Y.-H. Chang. 2010. “Using a Multimodal Learning System to Support Music Instruction.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 13 (3): 151–162. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.13.3.151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar