EIA and EMS integration: not wasting the opportunity

References

• Al-MaadedM, MadiNK, KahramanR, HodzicA, OzerkanNG. 2012. An overview of solid waste management and plastic recycling in Qatar. J Polym Environ. 20(1):186–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmmenbergJ, HjelmO. 2002. The connection between environmental management systems and continual environmental performance. Corp Environ Strat. 9(2):183–92.
   Google Scholar
• AnnGE, ZailaniS, WahidNA. 2006. A study on the impact of environmental management system (EMS) certification towards firms' performance in Malaysia. Manage Environ Qual Int J. 17(1):73–93.
   Google Scholar
• AnnandaleD, Morrison-SaundersA, BoumaG. 2004. The impact of voluntary environmental protection instruments on company environmental performance. Bus Strat Environ. 13(1):1–12.
   Google Scholar
• AronsonJ. 1994. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. Qual Rep [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sept 25]. 2(1). Available from: http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/BackIssues/QR2-1/aronson.html.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J. 1998. EIA follow-up. On the role of ex post evaluation in environmental impact assessment. University of Groningen. Available from: http://dissertations.ub.rug.nl/faculties/rw/1998/e.j.m.m.arts/?pLanguage=en&pFullItemRecord=ON.
   Google Scholar
• ArtsJ, CaldwellP, Morrison-SaundersA. 2001. Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions – findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 19(3):175–85.
   Google Scholar
• ArtsJ, NooteboomS. 1999. Environmental impact assessment monitoring and auditing. In: PettsJ, editor. Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Oxford: Blackwell Science; p. 229–51.
   Google Scholar
• BassiA, HowardR, GenelettiD, FerrariS. 2012. UK and Italian EIA systems: a comparitive study on management practice and performance in the construction industry. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 34(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• BeckerF. 2012. EIA–EMS link from the renewables sector. In: PerdicoulisA, DurningB, PalframanL, editors. Furthering environmental impact assessment: towards a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; p. 131–42.
   Google Scholar
• BournayE, HeberleinC, BovetP, RekacewiczP, RizzolioD, KluserS, MarinC, DaweN. 2006. Vital waste graphics 2. In: Secretariat of the Basel Convention, editor. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Program/GRID/Arendal, 8th Conference of Parties (Basel Convention).
   Google Scholar
• Briggs SLK. 2006. Do environmental management systems improve performance? [Internet]. Available from: http://www.asq.org/quality-progress/2006/09/standards-outlook/do-environmental-management-systems-improve-performance.html.
   Google Scholar
• BrouwerMAC, van KoppenCSA. 2008. The soul of the machine: continual improvement in ISO 14001. J Clean Prod. 16(4):450–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burström von MalmborgF. 2002. Environmental management systems, communicative action and organizational learning. Bus Strat Environ. 11(5):312–23.
   Google Scholar
• ChristensenP, KørnøvL, NielsenEH. 2005. EIA as regulation: does it work?J Environ Plan Manage. 48(3):393–412.
   Google Scholar
• COWI. 2009. European Commission, DG-Env. Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the EIA directive. Final report [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eia/pdf/eia_study_june_09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• DarnallN, HenriquesI, SadorskyP. 2008. Do environmental management systems improve business performance in an international setting?J Int Manage. 14(4):364–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DEAT] Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. 2004. Linking EIAs and Environmental Management Systems, Integrated Environmental Management Information Series 20, Pretoria: DEAT. p. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Defra. 2007. Incineration of municipal solid waste. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• [Defra] Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2011. Responsibility deal between government and the waste and resource management sector. In: Department for Environment FaRA, editor. London: Nobel House.
   Google Scholar
• de RidderW, TurnpennyJ, NilssonM, von RaggambyA. 2007. A framework for tool selection and use in integrated assessment for sustainable development. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 9(4):423–41.
   Google Scholar
• DipperB, JonesC, WoodC. 1998. Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review. J Environ Plan Manage. 41(6):731–47.
   Google Scholar
• EcclestonCH, SmytheRB. 2002. Integrating environmental impact assessment with environmental management systems. Environ Qual Manage. 11(4):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• EmilssonS, TyskengS, CarlssonA. 2004. Potential benefits of combining environmental management tools in a local authority context. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 6(2):131–51.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2013a. Environmental permitting regulations (EPR) assurance scheme [Internet]. Available from: http://www.environment-agency.gov.uk/business/regulation/145115.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2013b. How to complete an opra for waste facilities spreadsheet. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2013c. How to comply with your environmental permit. Bristol: Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Services Association. 2011a. Green growth: don't waste the opportunity. London: Environmental Services Association.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Services Association. 2011b. No time to waste – planning reform for sustainable waste infrastructure. London: Environmental Services Association.
   Google Scholar
• Eunomia Research and Consulting. 2013. Residual waste infrastructure review. High-level analysis – issue 4. Bristol: Eunomia Research and Consulting.
   Google Scholar
• FinkbeinerM, WiedemannM, SaurK. 1998. A comprehensive approach towards product and organisation related environmental management tools: life cycle assessment (ISO 14040) and environmental management systems (ISO 14001). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 3(3):169–78.
   Google Scholar
• FullerK, VetoriC, MunroB, HouseK. 2012. EIA–EMS link from the flood risk management sector. In: PerdicoulisA, DurningB, PalframanL, editors. Furthering environmental impact assessment: towards a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 157–73.
   Google Scholar
• GallardoALCF, SánchezLE. 2004. Follow-up of a road building scheme in a fragile environment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24(1):47–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GillhamB. 2000. Case study research methods (real world research). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• GlassonJ, TherivelR, ChadwickA. 2005. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Grant Thornton UK LLP. Waste and environmental sector update – Summer2012.
   Google Scholar
• GuestG, BunceA, JohnsonL. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods. 18(1):59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall D. 2007. Waste management companies in Europe [Internet]. Available from: http://gala.gre.ac.uk/2952/1/2007-06-G-EWCs.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hall D. 2010. Waste management companies in Europe 2009. Discussion Paper. Public services international research unit (PSIRU), Greenwich, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson C, Ranganathan J, Iceland C, Finisdore J. 2008. The corporate ecosystem services review: guidelines for identifying business risks & opportunities arising from ecosystem change. [Internet]. Available from: http://pdf.wri.org/corporate_ecosystem_services_review.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• HC Deb. 2012–2013. 555(col. 264 W).
   Google Scholar
• Heras-SaizarbitoriaI, LandínGA, Molina-AzorínJF. 2011. Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001?Int J Oper Prod Manage. 31(2):192–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HertinJ, BerkhoutF, WagnerM, TytecaD. 2008. Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies. J Environ Plan Manage. 51(2):259–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Treasury. 2013. National infrastructure plan 2013. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• [IEMA] Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment. 2011. Special report: the state of environmental impact assessment practice in the UK. Lincoln, NE: IEMA.
   Google Scholar
• IlomäkiM, MelanenM. 2001. Waste minimisation in small and medium-sized enterprises – do environmental management systems help?J Clean Prod. 9(3):209–17.
   Google Scholar
• JayS, JonesC, SlinnP, WoodC. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(4):287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-ThakurU, FischerTB, RajvanshiA. 2009. Reviewing design stage of environmental impact assessment follow-up: looking at the open cast coal mines in India. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 27(1):33–44.
   Google Scholar
• KeenM, SullivanM. 2005. Aiding the environment: the Australian development agency's experience of implementing an environmental management system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 25(6):628–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuismaM, LovioR, NiskanenS. 2001. Hypotheses on the impact of environmental management systems in industry. Helsinki: Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• LeeN. 2006. Bridging the gap between theory and practice in integrated assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26(1):57–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lien K, Colosimo KJ. 2008. Connecting the environmental management system and environmental impact assessment for pipeline projects. 2008 ASME International Pipeline Conference, IPC 2008. Calgary, AB: Canada.
   Google Scholar
• LundbergK. 2011. A systems thinking approach to environmental follow-up in a Swedish central public authority: hindrances and possibilities for learning from experience. Environ Manage. 48(1):123–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarshallR. 2002. Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow up. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 20(4):286–92.
   Google Scholar
• MarshallR. 2005. Environmental impact assessment follow-up and its benefits for industry. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(3):191–6.
   Google Scholar
• MarshallR, ArtsJ, Morrison-SaundersA. 2005. International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(3):175–81.
   Google Scholar
• MelnykS, SroufeB, CalantoneR. 2003. Assessing the impact of environmental management systems on corporate and environmental performance. J Oper Manage. 21(3):329–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, ArtsJ. 2004. Introduction. In: Morrison-SaundersA, ArtsJ, editors. Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. London: Earthscan; p. 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, ArtsJ. 2005. Learning from experience: emerging trends in environmental impact assessment follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(3):170–4.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, ArtsJ, BakerJ, CaldwellP. 2001. Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 19(4):289–96.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, BakerJ, ArtsJ. 2003. Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 21(1):43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-SaundersA, MarshallR, ArtsJ. 2007. EIA follow-up: international best practice principles. Fargo, ND: Fargo.
   Google Scholar
• NawrockaD, ParkerT. 2009. Finding the connection: environmental management systems and environmental performance. J Clean Prod. 17(6):601–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NitzT, HollandI. 2000. Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities?J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 2(1):1–17.
   Google Scholar
• NykvistB, NilssonM. 2006. Are impact assessment procedures actually promoting sustainable development? Institutional perspectives on barriers and opportunities found in the Swedish committee system. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(1):15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Obradovic V. 2011. Linking EIA with EMS: the way to environmental protection excellence. IPMA 25th World Congress. Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Palframan L. 2010. The integration of environmental impact assessment and environmental management systems: experiences from the UK. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• PalframanL. 2012. EIA–EMS link from the waste management sector. In: PerdicoúlisA, DurningB, PalframanL, editors. Furthering environmental impact assessment: towards a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 143–56.
   Google Scholar
• PerdicoulisA, DurningB. 2007. An alternating-sequence conceptual framework for EIA–EMS integration. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 9(4):385–97.
   Google Scholar
• PettsJ. 1999. Handbook of environmental impact assessment in practice: impact and limitations. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• PuvanasvaranAP, MuhamadMR, KerkRST. 2010. A review of purpose, benefits, impediments and structure of environmental management system (EMS). Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 4(10):4710–16.
   Google Scholar
• RadonjičG, TomincP. 2006. The impact and significance of ISO 14001 certification on the adoption of new technologies: the case of Slovenia. Manage Environ Qual Int J. 17(6):707–27.
   Google Scholar
• RaissiyanB, PopeJ. 2012. EIA–EMS link from the oil and gas industry. In: PerdicoulisA, DurningB, PalframanL, editors. Furthering environmental impact assessment: towards a seamless connection between EIA and EMS. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; p. 105–29.
   Google Scholar
• RamosTB, CaeiroS, Joanaz de MeloJ. 2004. Environmental indicator frameworks to design and assess environmental monitoring programs. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 22(1):47–62.
   Google Scholar
• RidgwayB. 1999. The project cycle and the role of EIA and EMS. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 1(4):393–405.
   Google Scholar
• RidgwayB. 2005. Practice report – environmental management system provides tools for delivering on environmental impact assessment commitments. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(4):325–31.
   Google Scholar
• RondinelliD, VastagG. 2000. Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems. Eur Manage J. 18(5):499–510.
   Google Scholar
• SánchezLE, HackingT. 2002. An approach to linking environmental impact assessment and environmental management systems. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 20(1):25–38.
   Google Scholar
• SheateWR. 2009. Tools, techniques and approaches for sustainability: collected writings in environmental assessment policy and management. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• SlingerJH, HuizingaP, TaljaardS, van NiekerkL, EnserinkB. 2005. From impact assessment to effective management plans: learning from the Great Brak Estuary in South Africa. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(3):197–204.
   Google Scholar
• SlinnP, HandleyJ, JayS. 2007. Connecting EIA to environmental management: lessons from recent industrial estate developments in England. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manage. 14(4):88–102.
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank Group. 2011. Urban solid waste management. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.go.worldbank.org/A5TFX56L50.
   Google Scholar
• TinkerL, CobbD, BondA, CashmoreM. 2005. Impact mitigation in environmental impact assessment: paper promises or the basis of consent conditions?Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 23(4):265–80.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2011. Opening remarks at press event on day of seven billion. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/apps/news/infocus/sgspeeches/statments_full.asp?statID = 1361.
   Google Scholar
• van der VorstR, Grafé-BuckensA, SheateWR. 1999. A systemic framework for environmental decision-making. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 1(1):1–26.
   Google Scholar
• VarnäsA, Faith-EllC, BalforsB. 2009. Linking environmental impact assessment, environmental management systems and green procurement in construction projects: lessons from the city tunnel project in Malmö, Sweden. Impact Assess Proj Appraisal. 27(1):69–76.
   Google Scholar
• WalkerD, PittM, ThakurUJ. 2007. Environmental management systems: information management and corporate responsibility. J Facil Manage. 5(1):49–61.
   Google Scholar
• [WRAP] Waste & Resources Action Programme. 2012. Environmental permitting. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wrap.org.uk/sites/files/wrap/4_O_And_EFW_Guidance_Permitting.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yin H, Schmeidler PJ. 2007. Does ISO 14001 certification enhance environmental performance? Conditions under which environmental performance improvement occurs. [Internet]. USA: risk management and decision processes center, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Available from: http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/WP2007-07_ISO-Cert.pdf.
   Google Scholar