Simulations of EIA screening across jurisdictions: exposing the case for harmonic criteria?

References

• [ABEMA] Associação Brasileira de Entidades Estaduais de Meio Ambiente. 2013. Novas propostas para o licenciamento ambiental no Brasil [New proposals for environmental licensing in Brazil]. Brasília: Associação Brasileira de Entidades Estaduais de Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, JHA-Thakur U, Laerhoven FV, Driessen PPJ, Onyango V. 2012. The Effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14:1250025-1-40.
   Google Scholar
• Brazilian Senate. 2016. Projeto de Lei do Senado nº 654, de 2015 Brasília: Senado Federal. Available from http://www25.senado.leg.br/web/atividade/materias/-/materia/123372
   Google Scholar
• Canter LW, Canty GA. 1993. Impact significance determination – basic considerations and a sequenced approach. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 13:275–297.10.1016/0195-9255(93)90020-C
   Google Scholar
• Chamber of Deputies. 2015. Projeto de Lei no 3729 de 2004 – Dispõe sobre o licenciamento ambiental, regulamenta o inciso IV do § 1º do art 225 da Constituição Federal, e dá outras providências. Brasília. Available from http://www.camara.gov.br/proposicoesWeb/fichadetramitacao?idProposicao=257161
   Google Scholar
• Christensen P, Kornov L. 2011. EIA screening and nature protection in Denmark. J Environ Manage. 92:1097–1103.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke B, Menadue T. 2016. Fit for purpose? Establishing the robustness of EIA screening systems for land-use planning using a case study from South Australia. J Environ Planning Manage. 59:538–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [CNI] Confederação Nacional da Indústria. 2013. Proposta da Indústria para o Aprimoramento do Licenciamento Ambiental [Industry sector proposal for the enhancement of environmental licensing]. Brasília: Confederação Nacional da Indústria.
   Google Scholar
• Duinker PN, Beanlands GE. 1986. The significance of environmental impacts: an exploration of the concept. Environ Manage. 10:1–10.10.1007/BF01866412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink B. 2000. A quick scan for infrastructure planning: screening alternatives through interactive stakeholder analysis. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 18:15–22.10.3152/147154600781767628
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Therivel R, Bond A, Fothergill J, Marshall R. 2016. The revised EIA directive – possible implications for practice in England. UVP Report. 30(2):106–112.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Noble B. 2015. Impact assessment research: achievements, gaps and future directions. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17:1501001.10.1142/S1464333215010012
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick P, Sinclair AJ. 2009. Multi-jurisdictional environmental impact assessment: Canadian experiences. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:252–260.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca A, Sánchez LE, Ribeiro JCJ. Forthcoming. Reforming EIA systems: a critical review of proposals in Brazil. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:90–97.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [FMASE] Fórum de Meio Ambiente do Setor Elétrico. 2013. Proposta de Diretrizes Institucionais para o Novo Marco Legal do licenciamento ambiental dos empreendimentos do setor elétrico [Proposlas of institutional principles for the new legal framework of the electricity sector's environmental licensing]. Brasília: Fórum de Meio Ambiente do Setor Elétrico.
   Google Scholar
• García-Montero LG, López E, Monzón A, Pastor IO. 2010. Environmental screening tools for assessment of infrastructure plans based on biodiversity preservation and global warming (PEIT, Spain). Environ Impact Asses Rev. 30:158–168.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Bellanger C. 2003. Divergent practice in a converging system? The case of EIA in France and the UK. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:605–624.10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00092-1
   Google Scholar
• Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A. 2005. Introduction to environmental impact assessment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hanna K, Noble BF. 2015. Using a Delphi study to identify effectiveness: criteria for environmental assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33:116–125.10.1080/14615517.2014.992672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann RM. 2015. Gargalos do Licenciamento Ambiental Federal no Brasil [Bottlenecks of environmental licensing in Brazil]. Brasília: Consultoria Legislativa da Câmara dos Deputados.
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Morrrison-Saunders A. 2016. Making sense of significance in environmental impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34:87–93.10.1080/14615517.2015.1125643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence DP. 2003. Environmental impact assessment: practical solutions to recurrent problems. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.10.1002/0471722022
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence DP. 2007. Impact significance determination – pushing the boundaries. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 27:770–788.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macintosh A, Waugh L. 2014. Compensatory mitigation and screening rules in environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 49:1–12.10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEA. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being – synthesis. Washington (DC): Millennium Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• MMA. 2005. Termo de referência para o estudo de Avaliação Ambiental Integrada dos aproveitamentos hidrelétricos na bacia do rio Uruguai [Term of reference for the integrated impact assessment of hydroeletric projects in the Uruguai watershed]. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Souza MPd. 2015. Impact assessment research in Brazil: achievements, gaps and future direcitons. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17:1550009-1–1550009-8.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 1998. Environmental impact assessment: a methodological approach. Norwell: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30:5–14.10.1080/14615517.2012.661557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MPU. 2004. Deficiências em Estudos de Impacto Ambiental – Síntese de uma Experiência [Shortcomings of environmental impact statements - synthesis of an experience]. Brasília: Ministério Público da União – 4a Câmara de Coordenação e Revisão.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen EH, Christensen P, Kornov L. 2005. EIA screening in Denmark: a new regulatory instrument? J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 7:35–49.10.1142/S146433320500192X
   Google Scholar
• Partidário M. 2012. Impact assessment fastips 1:1–2. Fargo (ND): IAIA.
   Google Scholar
• Pinho P, McCallum S, Cruz SS. 2010. A critical appraisal of EIA screeening practice in EU member states. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 28:91–107.10.3152/146155110X498799
   Google Scholar
• Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2013. Advancing the theory and practice of impact assessment: Setting the research agenda. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:1–9.10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaram T, Das S. 2011. Screening for EIA in India: enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach. J Environ Manage. 92:140–148.10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.08.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAE. 2009. Licenciamento Ambiental – Documento para Discussão [Environmental licensing - Discussion document] (Versão preliminar). Brasília: Secretaria de Assuntos Estratégicos da Presidência da República.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez LE. 2008. Avaliação de Impacto Ambiental: conceitos e métodos [Environmental impact assessment: concepts and methods]. São Paulo: Oficina de Textos.
   Google Scholar
• Slootweg R, Kolhoff A. 2003. A generic approach to integrate biodiversity considerations in screening and scoping for EIA. Environ Impact Asses Rev. 23:657–681.
   Google Scholar
• [UNEP] United Nations Environment Programme. 2012. Global environment outlook 5 (GEO5). Paris: United Nations Environment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Wathern P. 1990. Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. London: Routledge; New York (NY): Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Weston J. 2004. EIA screening for changes and extensions to existing projects: applying an EU perspective. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 6:177–188.10.1142/S1464333204001651
   Google Scholar
• Weston J. 2011. Screening for enviornmental impact assessment projects in England: what screening? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 29:90–98.10.3152/146155111X12913679730593
   Google Scholar
• Wood G. 2008. Thresholds and criteria for evaluating and communicating impact significance in environmental statements: ‘see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil?’. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 28:22–38.10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood G, Becker J. 2005. Discretionary judgement in local planning authority decision making: screening development proposals for environmental impact assessment. J Environ Planning Manage. 48:349–371.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2008. Environmental licensing for hydroelectric projects in Brazil: a contribution to the debate. Washington (DC): World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• WWF. 2014. Living Planet Report 2014: species and spaces, people and places. Gland: WWF International.
   Google Scholar
• WWI. 2015. State of the World 2015: Confronting Hidden Threats to Sustainability. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar