The Social Framework for Projects: a conceptual but practical model to assist in assessing, planning and managing the social impacts of projects

References

• Alkire S. 2002a. Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199245797.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Alkire S. 2002b. Dimensions of human development. World Dev. 30:181–205.10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00109-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkire S. 2010. Human development: definitions, critiques, and related concepts. Human development research paper 2010/01. UNDP. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdrp_2010_01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Anaya SJ. 2004. Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya SJ. 2005. Indigenous peoples’ participatory rights in relation to decisions about natural resource extraction: the more fundamental issue of what rights Indigenous peoples have in lands and resources. Ariz J Int Comp Law. 22:7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Attanasio O, Szekely M, editors. 2001. Portrait of the poor: an assets based approach. Washington (DC): Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Arce A. 2003. Value contestations in development interventions: community development and sustainable livelihoods approaches. Community Dev J. 38:199–212.10.1093/cdj/38.3.199
   Google Scholar
• Ashley C, Carney D. 1999. Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. London: Department of International Development. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0902/DOC7388.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington A. 1999. Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev. 27:2021–2044.10.1016/S0305-750X(99)00104-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckley TM, Martz D, Nadeau S, Wall E, Reimer B. 2008. Multiple capacities, multiple outcomes: delving deeper into the meaning of community capacity. J Rural Community Dev. 3:56–75.
   Google Scholar
• Benson C, Twigg J. 2007. Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: guidance notes for development organisations, ProVention Consortium Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.preventionweb.net/files/1066_toolsformainstreamingDRR.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brocklesby MA, Fisher E. 2003. Community development in sustainable livelihoods approaches: an introduction. Community Dev J. 38:185–198.10.1093/cdj/38.3.185
   Google Scholar
• Buxton A, Wilson E. 2013. FPIC and the extractive industries: a guide to applying the spirit of free, prior and informed consent in industrial projects. London: International Institute for Environment and Development. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16530IIED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carney D. 2002. Sustainable livelihoods approaches: progress and possibilities for change. London: Department for International Development. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0812/SLA_Progress.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carney D, Drinkwater M, Feefjes K, Rusinow T, Wanmali S, Singh N. 1999. Livelihoods approaches compared: a brief comparison of the livelihoods approaches of the UK Department for International Development (DFID), CARE, Oxfam and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). London: Department for International Development. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.start.org/Program/advanced_institute3_web/p3_documents_folder/Carney_etal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cernea M. 1997. The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations. World Dev. 25:1569–1587.10.1016/S0305-750X(97)00054-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cernea M. 2000. Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: a model for population displacement and resettlement. In: Cernea M, McDowell C, editors. Risks and reconstruction: experiences of resettlers and refugees. Washington (DC): World Bank; p. 11–55.10.1596/0-8213-4444-7
   Google Scholar
• Cernea M. 2003. For a new economics of resettlement: a sociological critique of the compensation principle. Int Social Sci J. 55:37–45.10.1111/issj.2003.55.issue-175
   Google Scholar
• Cernea M, Schmidt-Soltau K. 2006. Poverty risks and national parks: policy issues in conservation and resettlement. World Dev. 34:1808–1830.10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers R. 1983. Rural development: putting the last first. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers R, Conway R. 1991. Sustainable rural livelihoods: practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS discussion paper 296. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: https://www.ids.ac.uk/files/Dp296.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chirisa I. 2009. Prospects for the asset-based community development approach in Epworth and Ruwa, Zimbabwe: a housing and environmental perspective. Afr J Hist Cult. 1:28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Clark J, Carney D. 2008. Sustainable livelihoods approaches: what have we learnt? A review of DFID’s experience with sustainable livelihoods. Paper presented to ESRC research seminar October 2008. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0901/ESRC_SL_intro_paper_-_DFID[1].doc
   Google Scholar
• Coakes S, Sadler A. 2011. Utilising a sustainable livelihoods approach to inform social impact assessment practice. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 323–340.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz M, Foster J, Quillin B, Schellekens P. 2015. Ending extreme poverty and sharing prosperity: progress and policies. World Bank policy research note PRN/15/03. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/pubdocs/publicdoc/2015/10/109701443800596288/PRN03-Oct2015-TwinGoals.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Davies J, White J, Wright A, Maru Y, LaFlamme M. 2008. Applying the sustainable livelihoods approach in Australian desert Aboriginal development. Rangeland J. 30:55–65.10.1071/RJ07038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haan L. 2012. The livelihood approach: a critical exploration. Erdkunde. 66:345–357.10.3112/erdkunde.2012.04.05
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DFID. 1999–2001. Sustainable livelihood guidance sheets. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ennonline.net/dfidsustainableliving
   Google Scholar
• DIHR & IPIECA. 2013. Integrating human rights into environmental, social and health impact assessments: a practical guide for the oil and gas industry. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ipieca.org/sites/default/files/publications/Integrating_HR_into_environmental_social_and_HIS_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Emery M, Flora CB. 2006. Spiraling-up: mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Community Development: Journal of the Community Development Society. 37:19–35.10.1080/15575330609490152
   Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Franks D, Vanclay F. 2012. Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 30:35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves AM, Vanclay F. 2009. Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: applications in the minerals industry. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29:137–145.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankovits A. 2006. The human rights based approach and the United Nations system. Paris: UNESCO. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001469/146999e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Götzmann N, Vanclay F, Seier F. 2016. Social and human rights impact assessments: what can they learn from each other? Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34:14–23.10.1080/14615517.2015.1096036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Montes I, Emery M, Fernandez-Baca E. 2009. The sustainable livelihoods approach and the community capitals framework: the importance of system-level approaches to community change efforts. Community Dev. 40:106–113.10.1080/15575330903011785
   Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Langdon EJ, Vanclay F. 2016. Indigenous rights, performativity and protest. Land Use Policy. 50:490–506.10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F. 2013. Human rights, indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31:146–157.10.1080/14615517.2013.780373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2014. Improving the effectiveness of impact assessment pertaining to Indigenous peoples in the Brazilian environmental licensing procedure. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 46:58–67.10.1016/j.eiar.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna P, Vanclay F, Langdon EJ, Arts J. 2016. Conceptualizing social protest and the significance of protest actions to large projects. Extr Ind Soc. 3:217–239.10.1016/j.exis.2015.10.006
   Google Scholar
• Hussein K. 2002. Livelihood approaches compared: a multi-agency review of current practice. London: Department for International Development. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0812/LAC.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICMM. 2012. Integrating human rights due diligence into corporate risk management processes. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.icmm.com/document/3308
   Google Scholar
• ICMM. 2015. Land acquisition & resettlement: lessons learned. London: International Council on Mining and Metals. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: https://www.icmm.com/document/9714
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2002. Handbook for preparing a resettlement action plan. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/22ad720048855b25880cda6a6515bb18/ResettlementHandbook.PDF?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2007. Stakeholder engagement: a good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/938f1a0048855805beacfe6a6515bb18/IFC_StakeholderEngagement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2009a. Projects and people: a handbook for addressing project-induced in-migration. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 September 30]. Available from: http://commdev.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/In-Migration-Handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2009b. Good practice note: addressing grievances from project-affected communities. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/cbe7b18048855348ae6cfe6a6515bb18/IFC%2BGrievance%2BMechanisms.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=cbe7b18048855348ae6cfe6a6515bb18
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2010a. International lessons of experience and best practice in participatory monitoring in extractive industry projects. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://commdev.org/international-lessons-experience-and-best-practice-participatory-monitoring-extractive-industry
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2010b. Strategic community investment: a good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/f1c0538048865842b50ef76a6515bb18/12014complete-web.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2011. A guide to getting started in local procurement. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/03e40880488553ccb09cf26a6515bb18/IFC_LPPGuide_PDF20110708.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2012a. Performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/c8f524004a73daeca09afdf998895a12/IFC_Performance_Standards.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2012b. International finance corporation’s guidance notes: performance standards on environmental and social sustainability. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/e280ef804a0256609709ffd1a5d13d27/GN_English_2012_Full-Document.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2013. Good practice handbook on cumulative impact assessment and management: guidance for the private sector in emerging markets. Washington (DC): International Finance Corporation. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/ifc+sustainability/learning+and+adapting/knowledge+products/publications/publications_handbook_cumulativeimpactassessment
   Google Scholar
• IFC. 2014. A strategic approach to early stakeholder engagement: a good practice handbook for junior companies in the extractive industries. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: https://commdev.org/userfiles/FINAL_IFC_131208_ESSE%20Handbook_web%201013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jijelava D, Vanclay F. 2014a. Social licence to operate through a gender lens: the challenges of including women’s interests in development assistance projects. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 32:283–293.10.1080/14615517.2014.933505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jijelava D, Vanclay F. 2014b. Assessing the social licence to operate of the work of humanitarian and development cooperation organizations: a case study of Mercy Corps in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia. Social Epistemology. 28:297–317.10.1080/02691728.2014.922638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabra A. 2016. Assessing economic impacts of forced land acquisition and displacement: a qualitative rapid research framework. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 34:24–32.10.1080/14615517.2015.1096037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp D, Vanclay F. 2013. Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31:86–96.10.1080/14615517.2013.782978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr J, Charles K. 2016. The social impacts of dams: a new framework for scholarly analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 60:99–114.10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korf B, Oughton E. 2006. Rethinking the European countryside: can we learn from the South? J Rural Stud. 22:278–289.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2005.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 1993a. Assets-based community development. Nat Civic Rev. 85:23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 1993b. Building communities from the inside out: a path toward finding and mobilizing a community’s assets. Evanston (IL): Institute for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kretzmann J, McKnight J. 2005. Discovering community power: a guide to mobilizing local assets and your organization’s capacity. Evanston (IL): ABCD Institute. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.abcdinstitute.org/docs/kelloggabcd.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mathie A, Cunningham G. 2003. From clients to citizens: asset-based community development as a strategy for community-driven development. Dev Pract. 13:474–486.10.1080/0961452032000125857
   Google Scholar
• Mathur HM, editor. 2011. Resettling displaced people: policy and practice in India. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur HM. 2013. Displacement and resettlement in India: the human cost of development. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mathur HM, editor. 2016. Assessing the social impact of development projects: experience in India and other Asian countries. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McLean J. 2015. Beyond the pentagon prison of sustainable livelihood approaches and towards livelihood trajectories approaches. Asia Pac Viewpoint. 56:380–391.10.1111/apv.2015.56.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse S, McNamara N. 2013. Sustainable livelihood approach: a critique of theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-6268-8
   Google Scholar
• Morse S, McNamara N, Acholo M. 2009. Sustainable livelihood approach: a critical analysis of theory and practice. Geographical paper No. 189. University of Reading. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.reading.ac.uk/web/FILES/geographyandenvironmentalscience/GP189.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moser C. 1998. The asset vulnerability framework: reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Dev. 26(1):1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser C, Dani A, editors. 2008. Assets, livelihoods, and social policy. Washington (DC): World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Nel H. 2015. An integration of the livelihoods and asset-based community development approaches: a South African case study. Dev South Afr. 32:511–525.10.1080/0376835X.2015.1039706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M. 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Econ. 9:33–59.10.1080/1354570022000077926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. How’s life?: measuring well-being. OECD Publishing. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264121164-en
   Google Scholar
• Owen JR, Kemp D. 2012. Assets, capitals, and resources: frameworks for corporate community development in mining. Bus Soc. 51:382–408.10.1177/0007650312446803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxfam Cymru. 2013. The sustainable livelihoods approach: toolkit for wales. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://policy-practice.oxfam.org.uk/publications/the-sustainable-livelihoods-approach-toolkit-for-wales-297233
   Google Scholar
• Phillips R, Pittman R, editors. 2009. An introduction to community development. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Price S. 2015. Is there a global safeguard for development displacement? In: Satiroglu I, Choi N, editors. Development-induced displacement and resettlement: new perspectives on persisting problems. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt J. 2005. Capitalism as if the world matters. Sterling (VA): Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy G, Smyth E, Steyn M. 2015. Land access and resettlement: a guide to best practice. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar
• Rio Tinto. 2013. Why human rights matter. Melbourne: Rio Tinto. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.riotinto.com/documents/ReportsPublications/Rio_Tinto_human_rights_guide_-_English_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Robeyns I. 2003. Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Econ. 9:61–92.10.1080/1354570022000078024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodhouse T, Vanclay F. 2016. Is free, prior and informed consent a form of corporate social responsibility? J Cleaner Prod. 131:785–794.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones I. 1998. Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis, IDS working paper 72. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://mobile.opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/123456789/3390/Wp72.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scoones I. 2009. Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud. 36:171–196.10.1080/03066150902820503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scudder T. 2011. Development-induced community resettlement. In: Vanclay F, Esteves AM, editors. New directions in social impact assessment: conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; p. 186–201.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1981. Poverty and famines: an essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1985. Commodities and capabilities. New York (NY): Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1987. On ethics and economics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1992. Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1993. Capability and well-being. In: Nussbaum M, Sen AK, editors. The quality of life. Oxford: Oxford University Press; p. 30–53.10.1093/0198287976.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 2004. Capabilities, lists, and public reason: continuing the conversation. Feminist Econ. 10:77–80.10.1080/1354570042000315163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen AK. 2005. Human rights and capabilities. J Human Dev. 6:151–166.10.1080/14649880500120491
   Google Scholar
• Siegel A, Etzkorn I. 2013. Simple: conquering the crisis of complexity. New York (NY): Hachette.
   Google Scholar
• Small LA. 2007. The sustainable rural livelihoods approach: a critical review. Revue Canadienne d’études du développement [Can J Dev Stud]. 28:27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth E, Steyn M, Esteves AM, Franks D, Vaz K. 2015. Five ‘big’ issues for land access, resettlement and livelihood restoration practice: findings of an international symposium. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 33:220–225.10.1080/14615517.2015.1037665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solesbury W. 2003. Sustainable livelihoods: a case study of the evolution of DFID policy. Working paper 217. London: Overseas Development Institute. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/172.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tao T, Wall G. 2009. Tourism as a sustainable livelihood strategy. Tourism Manage. 30:90–98.10.1016/j.tourman.2008.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Secretary of State for International Development. 1997. Eliminating world poverty: a challenge for the 21st century, white paper on international development, Cm 3789. London: Stationery Office. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/poverty/downloads/keyofficialdocuments/Eliminating%20world%20poverty%20challenge.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2011. Guiding principles on business and human rights, HR/PUB/11/04. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2015. Sustainable development goals. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/
   Google Scholar
• [UN DESA] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2015. World population projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/2015-report.html
   Google Scholar
• [UN OHCHR] United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2016. What are human rights? [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Pages/WhatareHumanRights.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Valdés-Rodríguez O, Pérez-Vázquez A. 2011. Sustainable livelihoods: an analysis of the methodology. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 14:91–99.
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg L, Vanclay F. 2017. A human rights based approach to project-induced displacement and resettlement. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 35:34–52
   Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg L, Vanclay F, Lourenço I. 2017. The responsibility of business enterprises to restore access to essential public services at resettlement sites. In: Hesselman M, Hallo de Wolf A, Toebes B, editors. Socio-economic human rights in essential public services provision. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 180–202.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 22:183–211.10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 21:5–12.10.3152/147154603781766491
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2012. The potential application of social impact assessment in integrated coastal zone management. Ocean Coastal Manage. 68:149–156.10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Baines J, Taylor CN. 2013. Principles for ethical research involving humans: ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 31:243–253.10.1080/14615517.2013.850307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay F, Esteves AM, Aucamp I, Franks D. 2015. Social impact assessment: guidance for assessing and managing the social impacts of projects. Fargo (ND): International Association for Impact Assessment. [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/SIA_Guidance_Document_IAIA.pdf
   Google Scholar
• WCED. 1987. Our common future. The report of the world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2015. World Bank acknowledges shortcomings in resettlement projects, announces action plan to fix problems (Press Release). [cited 2016 April 12]. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2015/03/04/world-bank-shortcomings-resettlement-projects-plan-fix-problems
   Google Scholar
• Wörsdörfer M. 2014. ‘Free, prior, and informed consent’ and inclusion: nussbaum, ostrom, sen and the equator principles framework. Transnational Legal Theory. 5:464–488.10.5235/20414005.5.3.464
   Google Scholar
• Yeneabat M, Butterfield A. 2012. “We can’t eat a road:” asset based community development and the Gedam Sefer community partnership in Ethiopia. J Community Pract. 20:134–153.10.1080/10705422.2012.650121
   Google Scholar