Towards a more effective approach to the development and maintenance of SEA guidance

References

• Baresi U, Vella KJ, Sipe NG. 2017. Bridging the divide between theory and guidance in Strategic Environmental Assessment: a path for Italian regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:14–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AL, Therivel R. 2000. Principles to guide the development of strategic environmental assessment methodology. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 18(3):183–189.
   Google Scholar
• Caratti P, Dalkmann H, Jiliberto R. 2004. Analysing strategic environmental assessment: towards better decision-making. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chaker A, El-Fadl K, Chamas L, Hatjian B. 2006. A review of strategic environmental assessment in 12 selected countries. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:15–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha C, Bond A. 2013. Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 43:65–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craigie F, Snijman P, Fourie M. 2009. Dissecting environmental compliance and enforcement. In: Paterson AR, Kotzé LJ, Sachs A, editors. Environmental compliance and enforcement in South Africa. Cape Town: Juta. 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• De Montis A, Ledda A, Caschili S. 2016. Overcoming implementation barriers: A method for designing Strategic Environmental Assessment guidelines. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler MJ. 2006. A comparison between concept maps, mind maps, conceptual diagrams, and visual metaphors as complementary tools for knowledge construction and sharing. Inf Vis. 5:202–210.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2003. Strategic Environmental Assessment in post-modern times. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 23:155–170.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2005. Having an impact? – context elements for effective SEA application in transport policy, plan and programme making. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 7(3):407–432.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2006. Strategic Environmental Assessment and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 24(3):183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment: towards a more systematic approach. UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2014. Impact assessment: there can be strength in diversity. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 32(1):9–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P. 2006. SEA effectiveness criteria-equally valid in all countries? The case of Italy. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 26:396–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Kidd S, Peel D. 2009. Learning through EC directive based SEA in spatial planning? Evidence from the Brunswick Region in Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(6):421–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Seaton K. 2002. Strategic environmental assessment – effective planning instrument or lost concept? Planning Practice and Research. 17(1):31–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Welsch M, Jalal AI, Szkudlarek Ł, Bonilla M, Mwaura F, Haladyj A, Tomšić Ž, Athar GR 2018. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for Nuclear Power Programmes – Guidelines, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna. [accessed 15 Nov 2018]. https://www-pub.iaea.org/books/IAEABooks/12251/Strategic-Environmental-Assessment-for-Nuclear-Power-Programmes-Guidelines.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Welsch M, Jalal I. 2019. Guidelines for Strategic Environmental Assessment of nuclear power programmes – preparation process, contents and consultation feedback. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 37(2).
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Yu X. 2018. Sustainability appraisal in neighbourhood planning in England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09640568.2018.1454304
   Google Scholar
• González JCT, de la Torre MCA, Milán PM. 2014. Present status of the implementation of Strategic Environmental Assessment in Mexico. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 16(2):1450021.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, Namey EE, Mitchell EL. 2013. Collecting qualitative data. A field manual for applied research. London: Sage Publications; p. 376.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn JH, Noble BF. 2009. A conceptual basis and methodological framework for regional Strategic Environmental Assessment (R-SEA). Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 27:258–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén M, Furman F, Kaljonen M. 2004. Views on planning and expectations of SEA: the case of transport planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24:519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill M, Hupe P. 2002. Implementing public policy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jones C, Baker M, Carter J, Jay S, Short M, Wood C, editors. 2005. Strategic environmental assessment and land use planning: an international evaluation. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Kawulich BB. 2005. Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 6(2):Art. 43. May [accessed 2017 Aug 10]. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/466/996#g51.
   Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L, Thissen WAH. 2000. Rationality in decision- and policy-making: implications for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 18:191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Malvestio AC, Fischer TB, Montaño M. 2018. The consideration of environmental and social issues in transport policy, plan and programme making in Brazil: a systems analysis. J Clean Prod. 179(1):674–689.
   Google Scholar
• Malvestio AC, Montaño M. 2013. Effectiveness of Strategic Environmental Assessment applied to renewable energy in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 15:1340007.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden S. 1998. Importance of context in measuring effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 16:255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Montaño M, Opperman PA, Malvestio AC, Souza MP. 2014. Current state of the SEA system in Brazil: a comparative study. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 16:1450022.
   Google Scholar
• Nadruz VN, Gallardo ALCF, Montaño M, Ramos HR, Ruiz MS. 2018. Identifying the missing link between climate change policies and sectoral/regional planning supported by Strategic Environmental Assessment in emergent economies: lessons from Brazil. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews. 88:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsson MN, Dalkmann H. 2001. Decision making and strategic environmental assessment. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 3(3):305–328.
   Google Scholar
• Noble B, Nwanekezie K. 2016. Conceptualizing strategic environmental assessment: principles, approaches and research directions. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 62:165–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble BF, Gunn JH, Martin J. 2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for Strategic Environmental Assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 30(3):139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partidario MR. 2000. Elements of an SEA framework - improving the added-value of SEA. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 20(6):647–663.
   Google Scholar
• Posas PJ. 2011. Exploring climate change criteria for strategic environmental assessments. Prog Plann. 75:109–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rega C, Baldizzone G. 2015. Public participation in Strategic Environmental Assessment: a practitioners’ perspective. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 50:105–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2007. Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) in South Africa. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 9(1):83–101.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson T. 2005. Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 25(4):341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schijf B. 2011. Developing SEA guidance. In: Sadler B, Aschemann R, Dusik J, Fischer TB, Partidario MR, Verheem R, editors. Handbook of Strategic Environmental Assessment. London: Earthscan; p. 487–500.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MC. 2018. Revisiting implementation theory: an interdisciplinary comparison between urban planning and healthcare implementation research. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. 36(5):877–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tague NR. 1995. Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle. The quality toolbox. 2nd ed. Milwaukee: ASQ Quality Press; p. 390–392.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 1993. Systems of strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 13:145–168.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2010. Strategic Environmental Assessment in action. 2nd ed. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Caratti P, Partidário MR, Theodórsdóttir AH, Tyldesley D. 2004. Writing Strategic Environmental Assessment guidance. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 22(4):259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Tshibangu GM, Montaño M. 2016. Energy related Strategic Environmental Assessment applied by Multilateral Development Agencies — an analysis based on good practice criteria. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee W-H, Tang S-Y, Lo CW-H. 2014. Regulatory compliance when the rule of law is weak: evidence from China’s environmental reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 26(1):95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar