Reflecting on the preparation of guidelines for strategic environmental assessment (SEA) of nuclear power programmes

References

• Aschemann R, Baldizzone G, Rega C. 2016. Chapter 11: public and stakeholder engagement in strategic environmental assessment. In: Sadler B, Dusik J, editors. European and international experiences with strategic environmental assessment – recent progress and future prospects. London: Earthscan; p. 244–269.
   Google Scholar
• Belcakova I. 2008. Report preparation and impact assessment methods and techniques. In: Fischer TB, Gazzola P, Jha-Thakur U, Belcakova I, Aschemann R, editors. Environmental assessment lecturers’ handbook. Bratislava, Slovakia; ROAD Bratislava; p. 157–165.
   Google Scholar
• Canter LW. 1998. Methods for effective environmental impact assessment. In: Porter A, Fittipaldi J, editors. Environmental methods review: retooling impact assessment for the new century. Fargo (ND): IAIA; p. 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Costa A, Kallick B. 1993. Through the lens of a critical friend. Educ Leadersh. 51(2):49–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Montis A, Ledda A, Caschili S. 2016. Overcoming implementation barriers: a method for designing strategic environmental assessment guidelines. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:78–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 2013. Offshore energy strategic environmental assessment (SEA): an overview of the SEA process. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/offshore-energy-strategic-environmental-assessment-sea-an-overview-of-the-sea-process#offshore-energy-sea-research-programme.
   Google Scholar
• Dusik J, Fischer TB, Sadler B. 2003. Benefits of a Strategic Environmental Assessment, REC, UNDP, 5. www.ecissurf.org
   Google Scholar
• Ekovert Łukasz Szkudlarek. 2014. Strategic environmental assessment report for the Polish nuclear programme. Warsaw: Ministry of Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Department. 2005. Hong Kong strategic environmental assessment manual. http://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/SEA/eng/sea_manual.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. Implementation of Directive 2001/42 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/eia/pdf/030923_sea_guidance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2000. Lifting the Fog on SEA. Towards a categorisation and identification of some major SEA tasks. In: Bjarnadóttir H, editor. EA in the Nordic Countries. Stockholm: Nordregio; p. 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2006. SEA and transport planning: towards a generic framework for evaluating practice and developing guidance. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 24(3):183–197.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007a. Zur internationalen Bedeutung der Umweltprüfung (on the international importance of environmental assessment. UVP Rep. 21(4):248–255.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2007b. Theory and practice of strategic environmental assessment – towards a more systematic approach. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB. 2010. Reviewing the quality of strategic environmental assessment reports for English spatial plan core strategies. EIA Rev. 30(1):62–69.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer TB, Onyango V. 2012. SEA related research projects and journal articles: an overview of the past 20 years. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(4):253–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier M, Simard L, Waaub J-P. 2011. Public participation in strategic environmental assessment (SEA): critical review and the Quebec (Canada) approach. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 31:48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland. 2004. Assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment – guidelines for regional authorities and planning authorities. http://www.housing.gov.ie/sites/default/files/migrated-files/en/Publications/DevelopmentandHousing/Planning/FileDownLoad%2C1616%2Cen.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2000. Regulatory control of radioactive discharges to the environment, IAEA safety standard series no. WS-G-2.3.. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2002a. External human induced events in site evaluation for nuclear power plants, IAEA safety standards series no. NS-G-3.1.. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2002b. Dispersion of radioactive material in air and water and consideration of population distribution in site evaluation for nuclear power plants, IAEA safety standards series no. NS-G-3.2.. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2007. Considerations to launch a nuclear power programme. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2010. Seismic hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations, IAEA safety standards series no. SSG-9. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2011. Meteorological and hydrological hazards in site evaluation for nuclear installations, IAEA safety standards series no. SSG-18. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2012a. Regulations for the safe transport of radioactive material, IAEA safety standards series no. SSR-6. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2012b. Getting to the core of the nuclear fuel cycle – from the mining of uranium to the disposal of nuclear waste. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2013. Options for management of spent fuel and radioactive waste for countries developing new nuclear power programmes, IAEA nuclear energy series no. NW-T-1.24. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014. Managing environmental impact assessment for construction and operation in new nuclear power programmes, IAEA nuclear energy series no. NG-T-3.11. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2015. Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power, IAEA nuclear energy series no. NG-G-3.1. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA – International Atomic Energy Agency. 2018. Strategic environmental assessment for nuclear power programmes: guidelines. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Illsley B, Jackson T, Deasley N. 2014. Spheres of public conversation: experiences in strategic environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 44:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansson AHH. 2000. Strategic environmental assessment for transport in four Nordic countries. In: Bjarnadottir H, editor. Environmental assessment in the Nordic countries. Stockholm: Nordregio; p. 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA system: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiricka A, Formayer H, Schmidt A, Voller S, Leitner M, Fischer TB, Wachter TF. 2016. Consideration of climate change impacts and adaptation in EIA practice – perspectives of actors in Austria and Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 57:78–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiricka A, Wachter TF, Leitner M, Margelik E, Czachs C, Formayer H, Fischer TB. 2018. Entry points for climate change adaptation in EIA in Austria and Germany. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 71:26–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kørnøv L. 2009. Strategic environmental assessment as catalyst of healthier spatial planning: the Danish guidance and practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 29(1):60–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naturvardsverket. 2010. Practical guidelines on strategic environmental assessment of plans and programmes. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/Documents/publikationer/978-91-620-6383-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Noble BF, Gunn JH, Martin J. 2012. Survey of current methods and guidance for strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(3):139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novikau A. 2016. Nuclear power debate and public opinion in Belarus: from Chernobyl to Ostrovets. Public Underst Sci. 26(3):275–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD DAC. 2006. Applying strategic environmental assessment – good practice guidance for development co-operation. http://content-ext.undp.org/aplaws_publications/2083957/OECD%20DAC%20SEA%20Guidance%20eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2004. A practical guide to the strategic environmental assessment directive. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/7657/practicalguidesea.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Öko-Institut. 2015. Strategic environmental assessment of the national programme for the safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste. Cologne: Öko-Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Pampel FC. 2011. Support for nuclear energy in the context of climate change evidence from the European Union. Organ Environ. 24(3):249–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul C Rizzo Associates. 2010. Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) – Proposed Nuclear Power Plant Complex, Western Region, Abu Dhabi Emirate, UAE, Project No. 08-4075, Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Vol. 1, Abu Dhabi.
   Google Scholar
• Retief F. 2007. A performance evaluation of strategic environmental assessment (SEA) processes within the South African context. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(1):84–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scottish Environment Protection Agency. 2011. The Scottish strategic environmental assessment review – a summary. https://www.sepa.org.uk/media/27556/sea-review_summary.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stockholm Environmental Institute. 2001. Strategic environmental assessment: methodology and application in the energy sector. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish National Energy Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Tajima R, Fischer TB. 2013. Should different impact assessment instruments be integrated? Evidence from English spatial planning. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 41:29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therivel R. 2004. Strategic environmental assessment in action. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Caratti P, Partidário MR, Theodórsdóttir AH, Tyldesley D. 2004. Writing strategic environmental assessment guidance. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 22(4):259–270.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, Fischer TB. 2012. Sustainability appraisal in England. UVP Rep. 26(1):16–21.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. 2007. Kyiv protocol on strategic environmental assessment. [accessed 2018 Dec 27]. http://www.unece.org/env/eia/sea_protocol.html.
   Google Scholar