Embracing evolutionary change to advance impact assessment (IA)

References

• Arts J, Morrison-Saunders A. 2004. Chapter 12: Lessons for EIA follow-up. In: Assessing impact: handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. Edited by Angus Morrison-Saunders and Jos Arts. UK: Earthscan from Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arts J, Runhaar HAC, Fischer TB, Jha-Thakur U, Van Laerhoven F, Driessen P, Onyango V. 2012. The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 14(04):1250025. doi:10.1142/s1464333212500251.
   Google Scholar
• Aung TS. 2017. Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system and implementation in Myanmar: its significance in oil and gas industry. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 66:24–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banhalmi-Zakar Z, Gronow C, Wilkinson L, Jenkins B, Pope J, Squires G, Witt K, Williams G, Womersley J. 2018. Evolution or revolution: where next for impact assessment? Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 36(6):506–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber F. 2018. Is nationalism on the rise? Assessing global trends. Ethnopolitics. 17(5):519–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F. 2016. A game theory perspective on environmental assessment: what games are played and what does this tell us about decision making rationality and legitimacy? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 57:187–194. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, Retief F, Gunn JA. 2014. Impact assessment: eroding benefits through streamlining? Environ Impact Assess Rev. 45:46–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore M, Kørnøv L. 2013. Chapter 2 The changing theory of impact assessment. p.18-33. In: Sustainability Assessment:Pluralism, Practice and Progress. Edited by Alan Bond, Angus Morrison-Saunders and Richard Howitt. London: Taylor & Francis Group
   Google Scholar
• Coccia M. 2018. What are the characteristics of revolution and evolution? J Econ Social Thought. 5(4):288–294.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson B, Hassan S, Tansey J, Tansey J, Whitelaw G. 2005. Sustainability assessment: criteria and processes. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson RB. 2001. Specification of sustainability-based environmental assessment decision criteria and implications for determining ”significance” in environmental assessment.Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency. [accessed 2019 May 24]. https://static.twoday.net/NE1BOKU0607/files/Gibson_Sustainability-EA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson RB. 2013. Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 31(1):2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson RB. 2017. Sustainability assessment: applications and opportunities. Earthscan from London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking T. 2019. The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private-sector projects: theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian Development Bank. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37(1):2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2018. Special report: global warming of 1.5° C. [accessed 2019 May 24]. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/Access.
   Google Scholar
• International Association for Impact Assessment, & Institute for Environmental Assessment. 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. [accessed 2019 May 24]. Retrieved from: http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jay S, Jones C, Slinn P, Wood C. 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 27(4):287–300. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2016. 25 years of the UK EIA system: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:19–26. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi F, Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB. 2019. Evaluation of the environmental impact assessment system in Iran. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 74:63–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan RK. 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 30(1):5–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A. 2018. Advanced introduction to environmental impact assessment. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Bond A, Pope J, Retief F. 2015. Demonstrating the benefits of impact assessment for proponents. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 33(2):108–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Fischer TB. 2006. What is wrong with EIA and SEA anyway? - A sceptic’s perspective on sustainability assessment. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 8(1):19–39.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Gunn JAE, Bond A, Retief F. 2014. Strengthening impact assessment: a call for integration and focus. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 32(1):2–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxfam. 2019. Reward work, not wealth. [accessed 2019 May 24]. https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/bp-reward-work-not-wealth-220118-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Partidario M. 2012. Impact assessment. Fargo: International Association for Impact Assessment. Fastips No.1.. [accessed 2019 May 31]. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/Fastips_1%20Impact%20Assessment.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pediaditi K, Banias G, Sartzetakis E, Lampridi M. 2018. Greece’s reformed EIA system: evaluating its implementation and potential. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 73:90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathi A. 2017. Evaluation of project-level environmental impact assessment and SWOT analysis of EIA process in India. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 67:31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Retief F, Bond A, Pope J, Morrison-Saunders A, King N. 2016. Global megatrends and their implications for environmental assessment practice. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 61:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheate WR. 2009. The evolving nature of environmental assessment and management: linking tools to help deliver sustainability. In: Tools, techniques & approaches for sustainability collected writings in environmental assessment policy and management. London: World Scientific; p. 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Suwanteep K, Murayama T, Nishikizawa S. 2016. Environmental impact assessment system in Thailand and its comparison with those in China and Japan. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 58(April):12–24. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swangjang K. 2018. Comparative review of EIA in the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 72:33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The National Environmental Policy Act. 1969. (NEPA). [accessed 2019 May 24]. www.epw.senate.gov/nepa69.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Therivel R, González A. 2019. Introducing SEA effectiveness. Impact Assess Proj Apprais. 37:3–4, 181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. Agenda 2030 21 October 2015. A/RES/70/1. [accessed 2019 May 29]. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 1972. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment; Dec 15. [accessed 2019 May 29]. https://www.ipcc.ch/apps/njlite/srex/njlite_download.php?id=6471.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 1992. United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Vol. I; August 12. A/CONF.151/26. [accessed 2019 May 29]. https://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm.
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. 2012. United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development; Sep 11. A/RES/66/288. [accessed 2019 May 29]. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/66/288&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay F. 2015. Changes in the impact assessment family 2003–2014: implications for considering achievements, gaps and future directions. J Environ Assess Policy Manage. 17:01.
   Google Scholar